Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T10:22:05.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of environment and climate on occurrence of the cixiid planthopper Hyalesthes obsoletus, the vector of the grapevine disease ‘bois noir’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2013

Bernd Panassiti
Affiliation:
State Institute of Viticulture and Oenology, Freiburg, Germany
Michael Breuer*
Affiliation:
State Institute of Viticulture and Oenology, Freiburg, Germany
Stacey Marquardt
Affiliation:
State Institute of Viticulture and Oenology, Freiburg, Germany
Robert Biedermann
Affiliation:
Institute for Environmental Modelling, Straubing, Germany
*
*Author for correspondence Phone: +49 - 761 - 4016579 Fax: +49 - 761 - 4016570 E-mail: Michael.Breuer@wbi.bwl.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Species distribution models (SDMs), which are well established in many fields of biological research, are still uncommon in the agricultural risk analysis of pest insects. To exemplify the use of SDMs, we investigated the influence of environmental factors on the occurrence of Hyalesthes obsoletus Signoret (Hemiptera: Cixiidae). The planthopper is the only known vector of the grapevine yellows disease ‘bois noir’. The study was conducted in 145 locations in the Baden region of southwest Germany. The planthopper was surveyed on host plant patches, consisting of stinging nettle and/or bindweeds. We used a stratified modelling framework where (1) species presence–absence data were related to an extensive environmental dataset using logistic regressions; and (2) different types of average models were developed based on an information theoretic method. The results show that the incidence of H. obsoletus is associated to above- as well as below-ground environmental factors, particularly to the amount of fine soil and average annual precipitation. This result was consistent across all average models. The relative importance of other environmental variables was dependent upon the average model under consideration and thus may vary according to their intended use, either the explanation of habitat requirements or the prediction and mapping of occurrence risks. The study showed that SDMs offer a quantification of species’ habitat requirements and thus, could represent a valuable tool for pest management purposes. By providing examples of current issues of grapevine pests in viticulture, we discuss the use of SDMs in agricultural risk analysis and highlight their advantages and caveats.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. 145 locations where H. obsoletus presence/ absence was surveyed as dots on a chart showing the total annual precipitation in the Baden region. Interpolated average annual precipitation was derived from the WordClim database (original spatial resolution 30 arc seconds).

Figure 1

Table 1. Environmental parameter recorded for all sampling locations.

Figure 2

Table 2. Model performances and Global Moran's I statistics of multiple models which were used to construct average models. All performance measures represent arithmetic means as corrected by bootstrapping. ’.sq’ indicates a second order term was included to model a unimodal relationship. Model type refers to models that include besides other environmental parameters: (1) climate (MC), (2) climate and weather (MCW) and (3) climate and stinging nettle patch height (MCU). Abbr.: N = number of observations; R2N = coefficient of model calibration; AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) = threshold independent measure for model discrimination; Pfair = threshold where sensitivity equals specificity; κ = Cohen's kappa; sensitivity = proportion of correctly predicted presences; specificity = proportion of correctly predicted absences; CCR = correct classification rate; Moran's I = global test to examine spatial structures in model residuals.

Figure 3

Table 3. Comparison of a four parameter model with all corresponding nested correspondents. All performance measures represent arithmetic means as corrected by bootstrapping. ’.sq’ indicates a second order term was included to model a unimodal relationship. Abbr. see table 2.

Figure 4

Fig. 2. Average model MC (environmental and climate data) for H. obsoletus. The probability of occurrence of H. obsoletus is plotted against the amount of fine soil and average annual precipitation; diagrams represent different levels of shade and two categories of subsoil (other subsoil categories showed a similar trend as ‘unconsolidated material’ and are, therefore, not shown).

Figure 5

Table 4. Model averaging using four multiple models from the MC model type of table 2. Models were ranked in descending order according to their AICc. For each model weights (wi) were calculated based on AICc differences (Δ) and were used to derive individual coefficients weights (β×wi) in the next step. Finally, averaged coefficients (averaged β) and variable weights (relative and percentile) were determined.

Figure 6

Table 5 Model averaging using multiple models from the “worldclim” model type (MC) combined with models from the “worldclim + weather” model type (MCW) of table 2. Variables with a percental weight lower than one are not shown.

Figure 7

Table 6. Model averaging using multiple models from the “worldclim” model type (MC) combined with models from the “worldclim + stinging nettle patch height” – model type (MCU) of table 2. Variables with a percental weight lower than one are not shown.