Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:52:57.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Controlled studies further the development of practical guidelines to manage dodder (Cuscuta gronovii) in cranberry production with short-term flooding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2011

James M. O'Connell
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst Cranberry Station, East Wareham, MA 02538, USA.
Hilary A. Sandler*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst Cranberry Station, East Wareham, MA 02538, USA.
Lynn S. Adler
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Insect Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
Frank L. Caruso
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts Amherst Cranberry Station, East Wareham, MA 02538, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: hsandler@umext.umass.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Flooding is an inexpensive cultural practice used for pest management in Massachusetts cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) production. This project examined the use of short-term floods (<72 h) for dodder (Cuscuta gronovii Willd.) management under controlled conditions. Using incubators, seed was submerged in water for 0, 24 and 48 h at 10, 15 and 20°C (simulating spring water temperatures) and 0, 12, 24, 36 and 48 h at 15, 20 and 25°C (simulating summer water temperatures). Two 1-year controlled studies (field and greenhouse) evaluated three flood durations (0, 24 and 48 h) and four flood initiations (1, 2, 3 and 4 weeks after early seedling emergence (AEE)). Treated seeds were planted to cranberry vines and to Petri dishes; percent germination, degree of dodder attachment and dodder biomass data were collected. Treatments had limited effect on seed germination. Flooding 4 weeks AEE resulted in the lowest mean attachment ratings and dodder stem biomass on cranberry. This preliminary work provides evidence that flooding may retard dodder stem growth rather than reducing seed germination and that floods initiated after some time has elapsed after early emergence may be more effective than those initiated closer to the time of seedling emergence. More information is needed to thoroughly understand the processes involved; however, small projects such as this can provide interim guidelines that growers can immediately consider when deciding on a dodder management program.

Information

Type
Preliminary Report
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011
Figure 0

Figure 1. Model of the life cycle of dodder. Calendar dates are related to typical conditions for Massachusetts. *May occur in some dodder species.

Figure 1

Table 1. Percent germination of dodder seed plated to Petri dishes after being subjected to various flooding durations at various temperatures under controlled conditions in an incubator. Values are mean (n=8)±standard error.

Figure 2

Figure 2. 2006 mean attachment rating of dodder on cranberry vines following submersion in water for a certain number of weeks AEE for June 20 and June 27, 2006. A rating of 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 indicated 0, 1–3, 4–6, 6–10 and >10 attached stems, respectively. Bars are standard error of the mean.

Figure 3

Figure 3. 2007 mean attachment rating of dodder on cranberry vines following submersion in water for 1–4 weeks AEE for several dates in July and August 2007. A rating of 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 indicated 0, 1–3, 4–6, 6–10 and >10 attached stems, respectively. Dates of July 19, 2007, August 1, 2007 and August 28, 2007 were also significant, but are not included since dates in the figure are representative. Bars represent standard error of the mean.

Figure 4

Figure 4. In 2007, mean dry weight of dodder on cranberry subjected to floods initiated 1–4 weeks AEE. Mean separation with Tukey's HSD; means with the same letter are not significantly different. Bars represent standard error of the mean.