Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T23:12:23.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Supplementation with non-fibrous carbohydrates reduced fiber digestibility and did not improve microbial protein synthesis in sheep fed fresh forage of two nutritive values

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2011

I. Tebot
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiología, Instituto de Biociencias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay
C. Cajarville
Affiliation:
Departamento de Nutrición Animal, Instituto de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay
J. L. Repetto
Affiliation:
Departamento de Bovinos, Instituto de Producción Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay
A. Cirio*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Fisiología, Instituto de Biociencias, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de la República, 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay

Abstract

To determine whether non-fibrous carbohydrate (NFC) supplementation improves fiber digestibility and microbial protein synthesis, 18 Corriedale ewes with a fixed intake level (40 g dry matter (DM)/kg BW0.75) were assigned to three (n = 6) diets: F = 100% fresh temperate forage, FG = 70% forage + 30% barley grain and FGM = 70% forage + 15% barley grain + 15% molasses-based product (MBP, Kalori 3000). Two experimental periods were carried out, with late (P1) and early (P2) vegetative stage forage. For P2, ewes were fitted with ruminal catheters. Forage was distributed at 0900 h, 1300 h, 1800 h and 2300 h, and supplement added at 0900 h and 1800 h meals. Digestibility of the different components of the diets, retained N and rumen microbial protein synthesis were determined. At the end of P2, ruminal pH and N-NH3 concentration were determined hourly for 24 h. Supplementation increased digestibility of DM (P < 0.001) and organic matter (OM; P < 0.001) and reduced NDF digestibility (P = 0.043) in both periods, with greater values in P2 (P = 0.008) for the three diets. Daily mean ruminal pH differed (P < 0.05) among treatments: 6.33 (F), 6.15 (FG) and 6.51 (FGM). The high pH in FGM was attributed to Ca(OH)2 in MBP. Therefore, the decreased fiber digestibility in supplemented diets could not be attributed to pH changes. The mean ruminal concentration of N-NH3 was 18.0 mg/dl, without differences among treatments or sampling hours. Microbial protein synthesis was greater in P2 (8.0 g/day) than in P1 (6.1 g/day; P = 0.006), but treatments did not enhance this parameter. The efficiency of protein synthesis tended to be lower in supplemented groups (16.4, 13.9 and 13.4 in P1, and 20.8, 16.7 and 16.2 g N/kg digestible OM ingested in P2, for F, FG and FGM, respectively; P = 0.07) without differences between supplements. The same tendency was observed for retained N: 2.55, 1.38 and 1.98 in P1, and 2.28, 1.23 and 1.10 g/day in P2, for F, FG and FGM, respectively; P = 0.05). The efficiency of microbial protein synthesis was greater in P2 (P = 0.007). In conclusion, addition of feeds containing NFCs to fresh temperate forage reduced the digestibility of cell walls and did not improve microbial protein synthesis or its efficiency. An increase in these parameters was associated to the early phenological stage of the forage.

Information

Type
Full Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2011
Figure 0

Table 1 Chemical composition (% of DM) of feedstuffs (s.d. in parentheses) and of ingested diets for late (period 1) and early (period 2) forage periods

Figure 1

Table 2 Coefficient of digestibility of DM, OM, CP, NDF and ADF, in the three experimental groups for late (period 1) and early (period 2) forage periods

Figure 2

Table 3 Urinary elimination of allantoin (Uall), estimated production of MP, DOMI, EMPS and retained N in the three experimental groups for late (period 1) and early (period 2) forage periods

Figure 3

Figure 1 Mean ruminal pH (a) and N-NH3 concentration (b) for the three experimental treatments (F = forage, FG = forage + barley grain, FGM = forage + barley grain + molasses-based product) during the daytime in period 2 (n = 6 sheep per group). Vertical dashed lines indicate forage distribution; arrows indicate supplement distribution for FG and FGM groups; *P < 0.05 between supplemented groups; aP < 0.05 between F and FG.