Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-jswmv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T18:16:30.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Honeycomb’ tegmen: multiple tegmen defects associated with superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

R Suryanarayanan and
T H Lesser
R Suryanarayanan*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Aintree University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
T H Lesser
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Aintree University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr R Suryanarayanan, 56 California Close, Warrington WA5 8WU, UK. E-mail: drsury@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To report the coexistence of multiple tegmen defects, forming a ‘honeycomb’ pattern, together with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Case reports:

We describe three cases in which the above findings were noted, and we review the relevant literature.

Conclusion:

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence is defined as the absence of portions of bone over the canal along the floor of the middle fossa. Most published articles describe the defect as an isolated finding which is either unilateral or bilateral. Studies on temporal bones show either a defect over the superior semicircular canal or isolated defects over the tegmen. We describe three cases in which we found multiple tegmen defects, giving a characteristic honeycomb appearance, coexisting with dehiscence over the superior semicircular canal. This finding, which supports the theory of a developmental defect as the origin of the condition, has not previously been reported. A literature review is presented, with discussion of the aetiology and management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Keywords

Semicircular CanalsVertigoDehiscence

Information

Type
Clinical Records
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 124 , Issue 5 , May 2010, pp. 560 - 563
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009

Introduction

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence is characterised by the absence of part or all of the bone overlying the canal, exposing the membranous labyrinth to the middle cranial fossa. This condition was first described by Minor in 1998.Reference Minor, Solomon, Zinreich and Zee1 It presents clinically with the classical symptom of noise- or pressure-induced vertigo or disequilibrium. The diagnosis is confirmed by demonstration of the dehiscence in the coronal images of high resolution computed tomography (CT) scans of the temporal bones. Most of the published literature describes such dehiscence as an isolated finding confined to the canal.

We present three cases in which the superior semicircular canal dehiscence was accompanied by multiple tegmen defects, forming a characteristic ‘honeycomb’ pattern.

Case reports

Patient one

A 34-year-old woman presented with a history of the sudden onset of a feeling of imbalance while shouting as a spectator at a rugby match. Following this, she had become unsteady, with short-lived episodes of vertigo, whenever carrying heavy objects, climbing up a ladder, straining on the toilet or even getting out of a car. She had sustained a whiplash injury three years before presentation. Hearing was muffled in her left ear. There was no tinnitus or ear discharge, and she was otherwise fit and well.

Otoneurological examination did not reveal any abnormality.

Pure tone audiometry showed a mild, low frequency, conductive hearing loss on the left side, with a normal tympanogram. The Weber test localised to the opposite ear. Caloric testing did not reveal any significant canal paresis. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and internal auditory canal was normal. Computed tomography scanning of the temporal bones showed bilateral superior semicircular canal dehiscence (Figures 1 and 2).

Fig. 1

Coronal CT image of patient 1 showing multiple tegmen defects.

Fig. 2

Coronal CT image of patient 1 showing multiple tegmen defects.

The patient underwent obliteration of her left superior semicircular canal dehiscence via a middle fossa craniotomy, during which the honeycomb tegmen was noted. The dehiscence was covered with bone dust and bone cement.

Patient two

This 64-year-old man was referred with a history of hearing vibrations in the ears when singing or speaking. This was worse in the right ear but also occurred a little in the left ear, and had been happening for the previous five years. The symptom was so disturbing that the patient had had to cease singing, and had reduced the volume of his conversations to a minimum. He also reported feeling dizzy when shouting.

Otoscopy was normal. The patient was able to hear a tuning fork placed on his ankle. Neurotological examination did not reveal any abnormality.

Audiography showed moderate to severe, bilateral, high frequency, sensorineural hearing loss. Computed tomography scanning of the temporal bones showed bilateral dehiscence of the superior semicircular canals, more marked on the right than the left (Figures 3 and 4).

Fig. 3

Coronal CT image of patient 2 showing the superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Fig. 4

Coronal CT image of patient 2 showing multiple tegmen defects.

The patient underwent repair of his right-sided dehiscence via a middle fossa approach. Again, a honeycomb tegmen was noted. Repair was performed using temporalis fascia and bone pâté.

Patient three

A 53-year-old woman presented with a 20-year history of right-sided, pulsatile tinnitus, hyperacusis, and disorientation and unsteadiness, with increasing intra-aural or intracranial pressure. All these symptoms had appeared after a road traffic accident.

Neurotological examination was normal. The patient's symptoms were triggered by tympanometry. Her pure tone thresholds were normal. High resolution CT scanning of the temporal bones demonstrated right superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

The patient underwent middle fossa approach craniotomy, and multiple tegmen defects (honeycomb tegmen) were found (Figure 5). Both superior semicircular canal dehiscence and tegmen defects were closed with bone pâté and temporalis fascia.

Fig. 5

Peroperative image taken during middle fossa craniotomy showing the multiple tegmen defects.

Discussion

The tegmen defects described in the literature are mainly characterised by one or two isolated areas of bony dehiscence.

In a study of 1000 temporal bones, Carey et al. found bony dehiscence over the superior semicircular canal in five (0.5 per cent) specimens (0.7 per cent of individuals).Reference Carey, Minor and Nager2 Of these five specimens, the dehiscence was found between the canal and the middle cranial fossa in one, while in the other four the defect lay between the canal and the superior petrosal sinus. These authors also found markedly thin (less than 0.1 mm) bone covering the superior semicircular canal in another 1.4 per cent of specimens. The majority of the patients with thin bone covering did not report any vestibular symptoms. Such thin bone could easily be missed by imaging, unless ultra high resolution CT scanning was used; such cases would probably be shown as having a dehiscence by a normal scanner.

Single tegmen defects have also been found by various other authors, indicating an incidence that varies from below 1 per cent to as high as 34 per cent.Reference Ahren and Thulin3–Reference Tsunoda and Terasaki6

Tsunoda and Terasaki examined 69 cadaveric middle cranial fossae and found only two bony defects over the superior semicircular canal.Reference Tsunoda and Terasaki6 Both mastoids were well developed, with thin bone over the air cells. This study also included 244 dry bones, four of which showed a bony defect over the superior semicircular canal.

However, none of these temporal bone studies documented the multiple tegmen defects, forming a honeycomb pattern, noted in our patients.

Carey et al. postulated that the thinning and dehiscence of bone over the superior semicircular canal may result from failure of postnatal development of the outer and/or middle layer of bone over the canal.Reference Carey, Minor and Nager2 This conclusion was based on three facts. First, the dehiscence was similar in appearance to the findings in infant temporal bones, in which the bone over the canal was thin and did not reach adult dimensions until three years of age. It is however interesting to note that, despite this finding, there are no reports of symptoms in children. Second, the thin bone over the canal was found to be lamellar bone, indicating that long-standing processes were responsible for the thinning. Third, the fact that these defects are often bilateral also suggests a developmental cause.

Our finding of a honeycomb tegmen coexisting with a dehiscent superior canal would also support the above argument, indicating that the failure of bone formation need not be limited to the superior semicircular canal but could involve the entire tegmen plate.

Despite the presence of thin or dehiscent bone, many patients are asymptomatic.Reference Minor, Solomon, Zinreich and Zee1 However, extra force, in the form of direct trauma or barotrauma, may breach the thin bone, leading to the development of superior semicircular canal syndrome.

Sound-induced vertigo (Tullio phenomenon) or oscillopsia is often the symptom that prompts suspicion of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. The cause can be just loud noise, or sound of a specific frequency such as a telephone dial tone, a child's scream or a particular note on a church organ.Reference Banerjee, Whyte and Atlas7–Reference Ostrowski, Byskosh and Hain9 Clinically, the vestibular symptom can be elicited by a tone between 500 and 2000 Hz played at an intensity of 110 to 120 dB.Reference Minor10 Any circumstance causing changes in middle-ear pressure or intracranial pressure can produce vestibular symptoms. This includes performing a fistula test or Valsalva manoeuvre, nose-blowing, lifting heavy weights, straining of any nature, and air travel. The vestibular symptoms are attributed to increased compliance and abnormal movement of the endolymph within the canal, due to the presence of a third window.Reference Minor, Solomon, Zinreich and Zee1 Occasionally, chronic disequilibrium can result.Reference Minor10 The evoked eye movement is generally upward, torsional nystagmus in the plane of the affected superior canal.Reference Minor11

Patients with superior semicircular canal dehiscence can develop hearing loss with a characteristic low to mid-frequency air–bone gap, alongside bone conduction thresholds that are often better than 0 dB HL.Reference Minor10, Reference Mikulec, Poe and McKenna12 The air–bone gap can be as high as 60 dB at the lower frequency.Reference Mikulec, Poe and McKenna12 This large air–bone gap is due to the fact that some fraction of the fluid volume displaced by the oscillating stapes is shunted through the superior canal away from the cochlea.Reference Mikulec, Poe and McKenna12 The air–bone gap improves with surgical correction of the dehiscence.Reference Minor, Carey, Cremer, Lustig, Streubel and Ruckenstein13 Bone conduction thresholds are elevated due to the presence of a third window, resulting in greater fluid motion than normal, when the skull is made to vibrate by bone-conducted sound.Reference Mikulec, Poe and McKenna12 This elevated bone threshold has reportedly enabled patients to hear their own heel strike when running, or to hear a tuning fork placed on the lateral malleolus.Reference Watson, Halmagyi and Coltebach8, Reference Minor10

Some patients may present with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss.Reference Minor10 Their speech discrimination scores and tympanometric pressures are normal. Caloric test results are often normal, except when the dehiscence is large enough for the brain to press on the membranous labyrinth. Electronystagmography using a three-dimensional scleral coil is ideal to study torsional nystagmus, but video-occulography may also be helpful. The direction of nystagmus can give important clues to help determine which semicircular canal is defective.

Superior semicircular canal dehiscence may be misdiagnosed as otosclerosis when it presents with hearing loss alone, without vestibular symptoms. Even stapedectomy has been performed erroneously.Reference Mikulec, Poe and McKenna12 Bone conduction thresholds, being better than 0 dB (−5 to −15 dB), give a clue. In addition, a normal stapedial reflex can help to differentiate the condition from otosclerosis. The diagnosis is also likely to be missed in the presence of a coexisting condition such as chronic otitis media, in which case the symptoms will be attributed to the more obvious disease. Ramsey et al. detected superior canal dehiscence incidentally on a CT scan performed for chronic disequilibrium in a patient with persistent otorrhoea after mastoidectomy.Reference Ramsey, McKenna and Barker14 In such a situation, the clinician is more likely to suspect a fistula in the lateral semicircular canal, as did these authors. Tullio phenomenon can also be associated with syphilis, Ménière's disease, perilymph fistula and Lyme's disease.Reference Banerjee, Whyte and Atlas7 Interestingly, one patient with bilateral dehiscence in Carey and colleagues' study also had a large vestibular schwannoma on one side.Reference Carey, Minor and Nager2

  • • Superior semicircular canal dehiscence is characterised by the absence of part or all of the bone overlying the canal, exposing the membranous labyrinth to the middle cranial fossa

  • • This report describes three cases in which superior semicircular canal dehiscence was accompanied by multiple tegmen defects forming a characteristic ‘honeycomb’ pattern

  • • This finding has not previously been reported, and supports the theory of a developmental defect as the origin of superior semicircular canal dehiscence

Surgical treatment of superior semicircular canal dehiscence leads to resolution of symptoms. Plugging with bone pâté has been shown to be more efficacious than resurfacing.Reference Minor11, Reference Mikulec, Poe and McKenna12 Surgical closure of superior semicircular canal dehiscence carries a risk of sensorineural hearing loss, probably of similar magnitude to that of posterior canal plugging for benign positional vertigo. The middle fossa approach with temporal lobe retraction adds a further risk of epilepsy and this risk needs to be well understood by the patient, along with its implications for driving.Reference Aggarwal, Green and Ramsden15

References

1Minor, LB, Solomon, D, Zinreich, JS, Zee, DS. Sound and/or pressure induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:249–58CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Carey, JP, Minor, LB, Nager, GT. Dehiscence or thinning of bone overlying the superior semicircular canal in a temporal bone survey. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:137–47CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Ahren, C, Thulin, CA. Lethal intracranial complications following inflation in the external auditory canal in treatment of serous otitis media and due to defects in the petrous bone. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1965;60:407–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Lang, DV. Macroscopic bony deficiency of the tegmen tympani in adult temporal bones. J Laryngol Otol 1983;97:685–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Kapur, TR, Bangash, W. Tegmental and petromastoid defects in the temporal bone. J Laryngol Otol 1986;100:1129–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Tsunoda, A, Terasaki, O. Dehiscence of the bony roof of the superior semicircular canal in the middle cranial fossa. J Laryngol Otol 2002;116:514–18CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Banerjee, A, Whyte, A, Atlas, MD. Superior canal dehiscence: review of a new condition. Clin Otol 2005;30:9–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Watson, SRD, Halmagyi, GM, Coltebach, JG. Vestibular hypersensitivity to sound (Tullio phenomenon): structural and functional assessment. Neurology 2000;54:722–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Ostrowski, VB, Byskosh, A, Hain, TC. Tullio phenomenon with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:61–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Minor, LB. Superior canal dehiscence syndrome. Am J Otol 2000;21:9–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Minor, LB. Clinical manifestations of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1717–27CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Mikulec, AA, Poe, DS, McKenna, MJ. Operative management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence. Laryngoscope 2005;115:501–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Minor, LB, Carey, JP, Cremer, PD, Lustig, LR, Streubel, SO, Ruckenstein, MJ. Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior canal as a cause of apparent conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:270–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Ramsey, MJ, McKenna, MJ, Barker, FG. Superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome. J Neurosurg 2004;100:123–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Aggarwal, R, Green, KM, Ramsden, RT. Epilepsy following middle-fossa extradural retraction: implications for driving. J Laryngol Otol 2005;119:853–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1Coronal CT image of patient 1 showing multiple tegmen defects.

Figure 1

Fig. 2Coronal CT image of patient 1 showing multiple tegmen defects.

Figure 2

Fig. 3Coronal CT image of patient 2 showing the superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Figure 3

Fig. 4Coronal CT image of patient 2 showing multiple tegmen defects.

Figure 4

Fig. 5Peroperative image taken during middle fossa craniotomy showing the multiple tegmen defects.