Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T21:57:32.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Emplacement age and isotopic composition of the Prairie Lake carbonatite complex, Northwestern Ontario, Canada

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2016

FU-YUAN WU*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 9825, Beijing 100029, China
ROGER H. MITCHELL
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Lakehead University, Ontario, P7B 5E1, Canada
QIU-LI LI
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 9825, Beijing 100029, China
CHANG ZHANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 9825, Beijing 100029, China
YUE-HENG YANG
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 9825, Beijing 100029, China
*
†Author for correspondence: wufuyuan@mail.igcas.ac.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Alkaline rock and carbonatite complexes, including the Prairie Lake complex (NW Ontario), are widely distributed in the Canadian region of the Midcontinent Rift in North America. It has been suggested that these complexes were emplaced during the main stage of rifting magmatism and are related to a mantle plume. The Prairie Lake complex is composed of carbonatite, ijolite and potassic nepheline syenite. Two samples of baddeleyite from the carbonatite yield U–Pb ages of 1157.2±2.3 and 1158.2±3.8 Ma, identical to the age of 1163.6±3.6 Ma obtained for baddeleyite from the ijolite. Apatite from the carbonatite yields the same U–Pb age of ~1160 Ma using TIMS, SIMS and laser ablation techniques. These ages indicate that the various rocks within the complex were synchronously emplaced at about 1160 Ma. The carbonatite, ijolite and syenite have identical Sr, Nd and Hf isotopic compositions with a 87Sr/86Sr ratio of ~0.70254, and positive εNd(t)1160 and εHf(t)1160 values of ~+3.5 and ~+4.6, respectively, indicating that the silicate and carbonatitic rocks are co-genetic and related by simple fractional crystallization from a magma derived from a weakly depleted mantle. These age determinations extend the period of magmatism in the Midcontinent Rift in the Lake Superior area to 1160 Ma, but do not indicate whether the magmatism is associated with passive continental rifting or the initial stages of plume-induced rifting.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Distribution of the alkaline rock and carbonatite complexes within the Canadian part of the Midcontinent Rift. The spatial range of the proposed Keweenawan plume is also shown (modified from Ernst & Bell, 2010; Rukhlov & Bell, 2010).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Geology of the Prairie Lake complex.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Rare earth elemental distribution patterns of (a) apatite; (b) calcite; (c) titanite and perovskite; and (d) baddeleyite. Data sources: Phalaborwa baddeleyite – Wu et al. (2011); Catalao carbonatite baddeleyite – unpublished data (F. Y. Wu).

Figure 3

Figure 4. (a) Ba v. Sr and (b) Zr v. Nb variations between apatite and calcite, and (c) trace elemental ratios of calcite and apatite from different rock types.

Figure 4

Table 1. Baddeleyite U–Pb isotopic data by SIMS analysis

Figure 5

Figure 5. Baddeleyite U–Pb Concordia diagrams for the Prairie Lake complex. (a) NW-4 (carbonatite); (b) P10A (carbonatite); (c) MT25 (ijolite); and (d) P10L (ijolitic clast within carbonatite).

Figure 6

Table 2. TIMS U–Pb isotopic data of the NW-1 apatite

Figure 7

Figure 6. U–Pb diagrams for apatite from the Prairie Lake complex. (a) NW-1 (carbonatite, TIMS data); (b) NW-1 (carbonatite, SIMS data, the plots in grey are excluded for age calculation); (c) NW-4 (carbonatite, laser ablation data).

Figure 8

Table 3. Sr–Nd isotopic data of minerals from the Prairie Lake complex

Figure 9

Figure 7. Sr isotopic variations of (a) apatite, (b) calcite and (c) perovskite.

Figure 10

Figure 8. Nd isotopic variations of (a) apatite and (b) titanite and perovskite.

Figure 11

Table 4. Lu–Hf isotopic data of baddeleyite from the Prairie Lake complex

Figure 12

Figure 9. Hf isotopic variations of baddeleyite. Data for the Duluth zircon are from Woodhead & Hergt (2005), Kemp et al. (2009), Kimura, Tani & Chang (2012) and Fisher, Vervoort & Dufrane (2014).

Figure 13

Figure 10. (a) Sr–Nd and (b) Nd–Hf isotopic variations of the Prairie Lake complex. Sr–Nd literature data for the complex (grey circles in (a)) are from S. J. Pollock (unpub. MSc thesis, Carleton Univ., 1987), and Midcontinent Rift magmatism is from Hollings, Smyk & Cousens (2012). The fields of MORB (mid-ocean ridge basalt), OIB (ocean island basalt), global lower crust and sediments in (b) are from Wu et al. (2011).

Supplementary material: File

Wu supplementary material S1

Supplementary Table

Download Wu supplementary material S1(File)
File 68.6 KB