Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T04:07:24.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optical and chemical properties of polyterpenol thin films deposited via plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2011

Kateryna Bazaka
Affiliation:
Electronic Materials Research Lab, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia
Mohan V. Jacob*
Affiliation:
Electronic Materials Research Lab, School of Engineering and Physical Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia
Bruce F. Bowden
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Molecular Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville QLD 4811, Australia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: Mohan.Jacob@jcu.edu.au

Abstract

The development of novel organic polymer thin films is essential for the advancement of many emerging fields including organic electronics and biomedical coatings. In this study, the effect of synthesis conditions, namely radio frequency (rf) deposition power, on the material properties of polyterpenol thin films derived from nonsynthetic environmentally friendly monomer was investigated. At lower deposition powers, the polyterpenol films preserved more of the original monomer constituents, such as hydroxy functional groups; however, they were also softer and more hydrophilic compared to polymers fabricated at higher power. Enhanced monomer fragmentation and consequent reduction in the presence of the polar groups in the structure of the high-power samples reduced their optical band gap value from 2.95 eV for 10 W to 2.64 eV for 100 W. Regardless of deposition power, all samples were found to be optically transparent with smooth, defect-free, and homogenous surfaces.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011
Figure 0

FIG. 1. IR spectra of polyterpenol films fabricated at varied rf power levels.

Figure 1

TABLE I. Group frequencies for polyterpenol films.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. AFM images of polyterpenol films fabricated at (a) 15 W and (b) 100 W, scan size 1 × 1 μm.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. Water contact angle as a function of time for polyterpenol thin films deposited at different rf power levels.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Absorption coefficient of polyterpenol thin films fabricated at different rf input power.

Figure 5

TABLE II. Comparison of optical band gap estimates for polyterpenol films fabricated at varied rf input powers determined using UV-vis data, absorption coefficient data from the modeling of optical constants (n, k), and by fitting a Tauc-Lorenz oscillator model to the ellipsometric data (Ψ, Δ).

Figure 6

FIG. 5. Refractive indices of polyterpenol thin films manufactured at different rf powers as a function of wavelength.

Figure 7

FIG. 6. Extinction coefficient of polyterpenol thin films fabricated at various rf powers as a function of wavelength.

Figure 8

TABLE III. Summary of properties of polyterpenol thin film samples deposited as a function of rf input power.