Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T23:23:05.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electroantennographic and field responses of Hyphantria cunea (Drury) to synthetic sex pheromone components

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2025

Xudong Zhao
Affiliation:
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China College of Plant Protection, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China
Siqi Tang
Affiliation:
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
Zhuang Zuo
Affiliation:
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
Yishu Geng
Affiliation:
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China Shanghai Municipal Landscape Management and Guidance Station, Shanghai, China
Wenxuan Xu
Affiliation:
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
Tian Xu
Affiliation:
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
Dejun Hao*
Affiliation:
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China
*
Corresponding author: Dejun Hao; Email: djhao@njfu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Hyphantria cunea (Drury) is a highly polyphagous invasive pest that has become widespread and destructive in China. Although sex pheromone components of H. cunea have been identified, the weak field attraction of synthetic sex pheromone has hindered the application of sex pheromone-based lures in efficient monitoring and management of this pest. In this study, the electroantennographic (EAG) and field responses of H. cunea male adults to three synthetic sex pheromone components, including Z9, Z12, Z15-18Ald (C18:Ald), Z3, Z6-9S,10 R-epoxy-21Hy (C21-2Epo), and 1, Z3, Z6-9S,10 R-epoxy-21Hy (C21-3Epo), were evaluated. Male antennae exhibited significant dose-dependent response to three individual components and a ternary mixtures. The younger and virgin male moths showed stronger electrophysiological activity to synthetic compounds, whereas sensitivity decreased significantly after mating. Among the three components, C21-3Epo elicited the strongest antennal responses. Field trapping revealed that neither single compounds nor binary blends attracted males, whereas only the ternary blend of C18:3Ald, C21-2Epo, and C21-3Epo (ratio 8:1:1; 10 mg total load) effectively captured large numbers of males. In addition, the field trapping indicated that the green rubber septum functioned as a practical dispenser for synthetic pheromones. The Unitraps baited with the green rubber septum showed significantly higher trapping efficiency than cotton wicks, highlighting the septum as a promising dispenser for field deployment of synthetic sex pheromones. Finally, the green rubber septum baited with a ternary blend monitored the dynamics of H. cunea occurrence and detected that the emergence period overlapped with the commercially available synthetic lure. In general, the bioactivity of the synthetic sex pheromone of H. cunea was validated. It could effectively capture H. cunea male adults, be used to monitor and control H. cunea, and further be incorporated into the integrated pest management programme.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. EAG responses of H. Cunea males to different doses of the sex pheromone components and ternary mixture.

All data are means ± SE, lowercase letters represent significant differences in EAG values of males to different dose of chemical compound by Tukey test, P < 0.05.
Figure 1

Figure 2. EAG response of different day-old H. Cunea males to synthetic sex pheromone components and ternary mixtures.

Note: A: EAG response of different day-old H. cunea males to C18:Ald; B: EAG response of different day-old H. cunea males to C21-2Epo; C: EAG response of different day-old H. cunea males to C21-3Epo; D: EAG response of different day-old H. cunea males to ternary mixture. All data are means ± SE, lowercase letters represent significant differences in EAG values among different day-old males by Tukey test, P < 0.05.
Figure 2

Figure 3. EAG response of different mating status of H. Cunea males to synthetic sex pheromone components and ternary mixtures.

Note: A: EAG response of different mating status of males to C18:Ald; B: EAG response of different mating status of males to C21-2Epo; C: EAG response of different mating status of males to C21-3Epo; D: EAG response of different mating status of males to ternary mixtures. The asterisks represent significant differences in EAG responses between mated and unmated males by Student’s t-test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, n.s. not significant.
Figure 3

Figure 4. EAG responses of males to a single synthetic component, binary mixtures, and ternary mixtures.

Means followed by the different lowercase letters in every bar are significantly different (One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey test, P < 0.05).
Figure 4

Table 1. Captures of H. Cunea male moths by different types of dispensers loaded with sex pheromone in fields

Figure 5

Figure 5. Field catches of male H. Cunea in traps baited with synthetic single-component, binary mixtures, and ternary mixtures.

Note: All data are means ± SE. Asterisk (**) above each bar indicates significant differences compared to ternary mixtures (the non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis multiple comparison test, P < 0.001).
Figure 6

Figure 6. Emergence dynamics of H. Cunea males monitored with self-synthetic sex pheromone and Nitolure.

The yellow and grey shaded areas represented the error range.
Supplementary material: File

Zhao et al. supplementary material

Zhao et al. supplementary material
Download Zhao et al. supplementary material(File)
File 139 KB