Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T03:36:06.155Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Replication slippage and the dynamics of the immune response in malaria: a formal model for immunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2005

G. DODIN
Affiliation:
Université Denis Diderot, ITODYS, 1 Rue Guy de la Brosse, 75005 Paris, France
P. LEVOIR
Affiliation:
Université Denis Diderot, ITODYS, 1 Rue Guy de la Brosse, 75005 Paris, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A simple mathematical model of the dynamics of malaria invasion is proposed. The model is based on the hypothesis that replication slippage (slipped strand mispairing occurring in replicating DNAs), likely to take place within regular, low-complexity, regions of the plasmodium genome, is a significant mechanism of the ability for the parasite to escape the host immune defence. The model reconciles the conclusions of other formal approaches like periodic bursts of parasitaemia and, in particular, it predicts that antibody cross-reactivity affects the level and the time profile of malaria recrudescence. It also suggests that an efficient strategy for the parasite to escape host humoral immune defences is to express a single antigen. Linking local complexity to antigenic variability tentatively allows prediction of new potentially immunogenic sequences in the plasmodium genome.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Time-evolution of erythrocyte populations with variants from one antigen in a system of 5 antigens, 5 antibodies and 5 plasmocytes. Dynamic parameters (see also text): α=1·38 per day βi,i=0·001; βi,i±1=0·00065; βi,i±2=0·000036; βi,i±3=0·000022; βi,i±4=0·00001; in per day.per antibody; γ=0·0000001 per day.per antigen; Δ=0·035 per day; ε=0·01 per day. (A) Time evolution of the of the iRBC population in host; initial populations of infected erythrocyte for the naive host infected by 1 sporozoite: 17200, 11200, 6100, 3800, 1800. (B) Time evolution of iRBC populations per μl of blood (total blood volume: 5l); The parasitaemia is detectable from 10 iRBC per μl. Initial populations as in (A). (C) Time evolution of the iRBC populations per μl in a system with no cross-reacting antibodies.: α=1·38 per day, βi,i±1=βi,i±2=βi,i±3=βi,i±4=0; γ=0·0000001 per day.per antigen; Δ=0·035 per day; ε=0·01 per day. Initial populations as in (A). (D) Time evolution of the global parasitaemia; blue graph (a), cross-reacting antibodies; green graph (b), no cross-reacting antibodies. (E) Time evolution of iRBC with initial populations respectively: 36000, 1000, 1000, 1000, 1000.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Time evolution of the global RBC population of 2 variants from 2 antigens. Graphs (a): each iRBC harbours 1 variant of each antigen. Graphs (b): each iRBC has 1 variant of either antigen. Dynamic parameters: antigen 1: α=1·38 per day βi,i=0·001; βi,i±1=0·00065; in per day.per antibody; antigen 2: α=1·38 per day βi,i=0·003; βi,i±1=0·0015; in per day.per antibody. γ=0·0000001 per day.per antigen; Δ=0·035 per day; ε=0·01 per day. The initial populations of infected RBC are denoted for each antigen A and variant V as AiVj. (A) Antigen initial populations: A1V1=19000; A1V2=1000; A2V1=19000; A2V2=1000. (B) A1V1=19000; A1V2=12000; A2V1=6000; A2V2=3000. (C) A1V1=6000; A1V2=3000; A2V1=19000; A2V2=12000. (D) A1V1=12000; A1V2=8000; A2V1=12000; A2V2=8000.

Figure 2

Fig. S1. Percentage of Watson-Crick pairs in the rep-20 region of P. falciparum chromosome 2 conserved after strand slippage (base position: 12000–20000 on chromosome sequence).

Figure 3

Fig. S2. Percentage of Watson-Crick pairs in the PfEMP3 gene located at base position 91318–98838 on chromosome 2 nucleotide sequence after strand slippage.