Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T16:08:55.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geochemistry and related studies of Clyde Estuary sediments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 November 2018

David G. Jones
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Christopher H. Vane*
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Solveigh Lass-Evans
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK.
Simon Chenery
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Bob Lister
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Mark Cave
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Joana Gafeira
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK.
Gareth Jenkins
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Alick Leslie
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, The Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, UK.
Neil Breward
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Katy Freeborough
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Ian Harrison
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Alexander W. Kim
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Alicja Lacinska
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Tony Milodowski
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
John Ridgway
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Jim Riding
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Mick Strutt
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Doris Wagner
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
Ian Wilkinson
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG, UK. Email: chv@bgs.ac.uk
*
*Corresponding author
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Geochemical and related studies have been made of near-surface sediments from the River Clyde estuary and adjoining areas, extending from Glasgow to the N, and W as far as the Holy Loch on the W coast of Scotland, UK. Multibeam echosounder, sidescan sonar and shallow seismic data, taken with core information, indicate that a shallow layer of modern sediment, often less than a metre thick, rests on earlier glacial and post-glacial sediments. The offshore Quaternary history can be aligned with onshore sequences, with the recognition of buried drumlins, settlement of muds from quieter water, probably behind an ice dam, and later tidal delta deposits. The geochemistry of contaminants within the cores also indicates shallow contaminated sediments, often resting on pristine pre-industrial deposits at depths less than 1m. The distribution of different contaminants with depth in the sediment, such as Pb (and Pb isotopes), organics and radionuclides, allow chronologies of contamination from different sources to be suggested. Dating was also attempted using microfossils, radiocarbon and 210Pb, but with limited success. Some of the spatial distribution of contaminants in the surface sediments can be related to grain-size variations. Contaminants are highest, both in absolute terms and in enrichment relative to the natural background, in the urban and inner estuary and in the Holy Loch, reflecting the concentration of industrial activity.

Figure 0

Figure 1 Track plots of boomer surveys and multibeam coverage in the Clyde Estuary, with inset showing location of the study area in the UK.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Distribution of buried late- and post-glacial sediment types interpreted from seismic facies in the inner Clyde Estuary.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Distribution of seabed sediments in the Clyde Estuary, based on geophysical interpretation and sediment grain-size analysis. (a) Eastern section from Glasgow to Greenock. (b) Western section from Glasgow to the Holy Loch. Unlabelled cores are in the same location as those shown in parentheses: 720(722), 733(731), 739(738), 745(744), 749(747), 755(754), 778(777) and 787(789).

Figure 3

Figure 4 (a) Coloured and shaded relief (NW illumination) digital elevation model derived from multibeam echosounder data. (b) Interpretative map of bathymetry and surface features from multibeam and boomer data.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Graduated symbol maps of Cu and Pb distributions in the Clyde Estuary surface sediments. Percentiles of the data distribution are shown for (a) the analysed values and (b) the values normalised to Al to address possible grain-size variations.

Figure 5

Figure 6 Individual sediment samples in the Clyde Estuary that exceed the probable effect concentrations of the sediment quality guidelines for As, Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni and Pb (Macdonald et al. 1996, 2000b).

Figure 6

Table 1 Estimated background concentrations (BCs)1 of the study area and OSPAR background concentrations (OSPAR Commission 2008). Note: the Oslo and Paris Conventions (OSPAR) BCs were normalised to both Al and Li concentrations where possible, and a rounded value in the upper range was used as the BC (OSPAR Commission 2008).

Figure 7

Figure 7 Map showing the calculated enrichment factors (EFs) for sediment samples that had (i) EF>5 for at least four elements and (ii) major element concentrations similar to core sample 733 used to calculate the geological background. Current and former land-use types are also shown as an indication of possible pollution sources.

Figure 8

Figure 8 Location of samples and organic contaminant depth profiles of sediments from the Clyde Estuary (Vane et al., 2011). Abbreviations: TOC = total organic carbon; TPH = total petroleum hydrocarbons; PAH = polyaromatic hydrocarbons; PCB = polychlorinated biphenyls. Rationale for dates: 1750 = pre-industrial from 207Pb/206Pb; 1915 = peak coal production; 1954 = onset of PCB production in UK; 1965–1977 = peak PCB production; 1985 from peak 207Pb/206Pb values. PCB concentration data not shown for core 714 due to interferences. Depth profiles for Pb (filled triangles) and 207Pb/206Pb (filled diamonds). Typical 207Pb/206Pb errors are 0.0012 (2 sigma). Note change in concentration scale for lower set of cores.

Figure 9

Figure 9 Location of samples and depth profiles of PBDE in sediment cores from the Clyde Estuary (Vane et al., 2010). Abbreviations: PBDE=polybrominated diphenyl ethers; BDE=brominated diphenyl ether.

Figure 10

Figure 10 Depth profiles of down-cores for 137Cs in Clyde Estuary sediments (see Fig. 3 for locations).

Figure 11

Figure 11 Locations of cores used for CISED sequential extraction study.

Figure 12

Figure 12 The relative contribution of each component in the CISED sequential extractions summarised as boxplots showing the median (bold line), interquartile range (box), data within 1.5×the interquartile range (whiskers) and possible outliers outside this. The components are ordered by increasing difficulty of extraction.

Figure 13

Figure 13 The fractionation of As, Cd, Cr, Pb and V between the geochemical components from the CISED sequential extractions.

Figure 14

Figure 14 Spatial distribution of the main physicochemical components in the Clyde Estuary (mg/kg). (a) As-containing (Fe.S.2). (b) Cd-containing (Fe.Zn). (c) Cr-containing (S.Fe). (d) V-containing (Na.K).