Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T11:33:24.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Petrogenesis and metallogenesis of the Qieganbulake carbonatite-related phosphate deposit associated with the mafic–ultramafic–carbonatite complex in the Kuluketage block, northeastern Tarim Craton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2023

Wei Chen
Affiliation:
Wuhan Centre of Geological Survey CGS, Wuhan 430205, China Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Xinbiao Lü
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Qian Yuan
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, School of Earth and Space Exploration, PO Box 876004, Tempe, AZ 85287-6004, USA
Changsheng Huang
Affiliation:
Wuhan Centre of Geological Survey CGS, Wuhan 430205, China
Xiang Gao
Affiliation:
Guangxi Geological Exploration Institute of China Metallurgical Geology Bureau, Nanning 530022, China
Youyue Lu
Affiliation:
Wuhan Centre of Geological Survey CGS, Wuhan 430205, China
Xiaofeng Cao*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Author for correspondence: Xiaofeng Cao, Emails: cshuang@cug.edu.cn, cao079@qq.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Qieganbulake deposit associated with a mafic–ultramafic–carbonatite complex in the Kuluketage block is not only the world’s second-largest vermiculite deposit, but also a medium-size carbonatite-related phosphate deposit. Field observations, radiometric dating results and Sr–Nd–Hf isotopes reveal that the parental magmas of the carbonatite and mafic–ultramafic rocks are cogenetic and formed synchronously at c. 810 Ma. Geochemical characteristics and Sr–Nd–Hf–S isotopes ((87Sr/86Sr)i = 0.70581–0.70710; ϵNd(t) = −0.20 to −11.80; ϵHf(t) = −7.5 to −10.3; δ34S = +0.7 ‰ to +3.0 ‰ (some sulfides with high δ34S values (+3.2 to +6.6) were formed by late hydrothermal sulfur)), in combination with mineral compositions and previous research, strongly indicate that the Qieganbulake mafic–ultramafic–carbonatite complex formed via extensive crystal fractionation/cumulation and liquid immiscibility of a carbonated tholeiitic magma, possibly derived from partial melting of an enriched subcontinental lithospheric mantle previously modified by slab-released fluids and sediment input in a continental rift setting. The coupled enriched Sr–Nd isotopic signatures, in combination with previous research, suggest that the enriched subcontinental lithospheric mantle could have been metasomatized by asthenospheric mantle melts to different degrees. The Qieganbulake carbonatite-related phosphate ores were the products of normal fractional crystallization/cumulation of P–Fe3+ complex enriched carbonatite magma in high oxygen fugacity conditions, which was generated by liquid immiscibility of CO2–Fe–Ti–P-rich residual magma undergoing high differentiation.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Tectonic framework of the TC and adjacent areas (after Wu et al. 2018). NCC – North China Craton; SCC – South China Craton; TC – Tarim Craton. (b) Regional geological map of the Kuluketage area in northeastern Tarim (after Shu et al. 2011; Han et al. 2016), showing the Fe–P–Ti oxide deposits. 1 – the Xingdi fault forming the southern boundary of the Kuluketage domain; 2 – the Korla Xinger fault forming the northern boundary of the Kuluketage domain; 3 – the Kumux–Hejing fault between the Palaeozoic central Tianshan and southern Tianshan belts.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simplified geological map of the Qieganbulake vermiculite–apatite deposit (after Yin, 1992), showing the sample locations and sample types. Ap Cpx – apatite-bearing clinopyroxenite; Bt Cpx – biotite-bearing clinopyroxenite; Cc – carbonatite; Ol Ap Cc – olivine- and apatite-bearing carbonatite; Mt Ap Cc – magnetite- and apatite-bearing carbonatite; Phl – phlogopitelite; Fsp Cpx – feldspar-bearing clinopyroxenite; Srp Dun – serpentinized dunite.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Geological features of the Qieganbulake vermiculite–apatite deposit. (a) Clinopyroxenite intruded into Palaeoproterozoic formations. (b) Carbonatite veins intruded into Palaeoproterozoic formations. (c) Phlogopitelite; (d) gabbro; and (e) disseminated carbonatite-related phosphate ore. Photomicrographs of (f) phlogopitelite; (g) serpentinized dunite; (h) apatite and olivine grains enclosed in calcite crystals; (i) olivine grains enclosed in calcite crystals; (j) apatite- and magnetite-bearing clinopyroxenite, with apatite grains enclosed in clinopyroxene crystals; (k) apatite-bearing clinopyroxenite; (l) disseminated phosphate ore; (m) ilmenite and spinel crystals dissolved in magnetite crystal; (n) baddeleyite grain enclosed in magnetite crystal of carbonatite; (o) ilmenites symbiotic with magnetites in the form of lamellae crystals. Cpx – clinopyroxene; Pl – plagioclase; Ol – olivine; Phl – phlogopite; Srp – serpentine; Cal – calcite; Mt – magnetite; Ap – apatite; Ilm – ilmenite; Spl – spinel; Bad – baddeleyite. Diameter of the coin for scale is 19 mm.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Textural relationships between apatite and/or magnetite-bearing clinopyroxenites and disseminated ores from the QMC. (a) Apatite grain is enclosed in olivine, and apatite grains display typical cumulate texture. (b) Apatite grains are enclosed in calcite crystals. (c) Apatite grains are enclosed in clinopyroxene crystals, with the symbiotic texture of magnetite and ilmenite. (d) Apatite grains occupy the interstitial regions between clinopyroxene crystals. (e) Magnetite and ilmenite grains are enclosed in clinopyroxene crystals, with the symbiotic texture of magnetite and ilmenite. (f) Magnetite and ilmenite grains occupy the interstitial regions between calcite crystals, and magnetite and ilmenite grains are enclosed in calcite crystals. (g) Magnetite grain is enclosed in olivine crystal. (h) Magnetite and ilmenite grains occupy the interstitial regions between clinopyroxene crystals. (i) Magnetite and ilmenite grains occupy the interstitial regions between clinopyroxene crystals, and magnetite and ilmenite grains are enclosed in clinopyroxene crystals. Cpx – clinopyroxene; Ol – olivine; Srp – serpentine; Cal – calcite; Mt – magnetite; Ap – apatite; Ilm – ilmenite.

Figure 4

Table 1. Samples and brief description

Figure 5

Fig. 5. (a) Zircon U–Pb concordia diagrams and (b) chondrite-normalized (Sun & McDonough, 1989) zircon REE patterns and cathodoluminescence (CL) images of zircons for the dated gabbro. (c) Photomicrograph of apatite grains imaged by CL, with the circles showing the locations of LA-ICP-MS 206Pb–238U dating. Ap – apatite; Cal – calcite; Phl – phlogopite. (d) Apatite U–Pb concordia diagrams for the dated phosphate ores.

Figure 6

Table 2. Major-element compositions (wt %) of olivines from the QMC

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Wo–En–Fs diagram showing the compositions of clinopyroxenes from the QMC.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. (a–h) Binary variation diagrams (TiO2, Al2O3, V2O3, FeO, SiO2, MnO, Na2O and MgO versus CaO) for clinopyroxenes from the QMC.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. (a, c) Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and (b, d) primitive mantle-normalized incompatible element spider diagrams for the rocks from the QMC. The normalizing values are from Sun & McDonough (1989).

Figure 10

Fig. 9. (a) ∑REE versus P2O5 discrimination diagram. (b) (La/Sm)N versus La discrimination diagram after Treuil & Joron (1975). (c) ∑REE versus P2O5 discrimination diagram. FC – fractional crystallization; IM – liquid immiscibility; PM – partial melting.

Figure 11

Table 3. Whole-rock Sr–Nd isotopic data for the QMC

Figure 12

Fig. 10. Plot of ϵNd(t) values versus (87Sr/86Sr)i values of the QMC and apatites from the Kawuliuke 810 Ma pyroxenite (W. Chen, unpub. Ph.D. thesis, China Univ. Geosciences, 2021), northeastern Tarim Block. Depleted MORB mantle (DMM), high-µ (HIMU), enriched mantle I (EMI) and enriched mantle II (EMII) components are from Zindler & Hart (1986) and DePaolo (1979). Base plot is after Hart & Zindler (1989). MORB – mid-ocean ridge basalt; OIB – ocean island basalt.

Figure 13

Table 4. LA-ICP-MS Lu–Hf isotopic compositions of zircon grains for the gabbro

Figure 14

Fig. 11. ϵHf(t) versus crystal age plots for dated zircon samples (after Long et al. 2011a). DM – depleted mantle; CHUR – chondritic uniform reservoir.

Figure 15

Fig. 12. Chondrite-normalized REE distribution patterns of apatites from the QMC. The chondrite data are from Sun & McDonough (1989).

Figure 16

Fig. 13. Binary variation diagrams for apatites from the QMC: (a) Sr versus ∑REE; (b) La/Yb versus ∑REE; (c) La/Yb versus Sr; (d) Sm/Yb versus La/Yb. Data for apatites in ore and carbonatite from Q. Yuan (unpub. Ph.D. thesis, China Univ. Geosciences, 2016), Ye et al. (2013) and W. Chen (unpub. Ph.D. thesis, China Univ. Geosciences, 2021).

Figure 17

Fig. 14. (a) Cumulative probability histogram of ϵNd(t) values of apatites enclosed in olivines and calcites of ore. (b) Weighted mean diagram of (87Sr/86Sr)i values of apatites enclosed in olivines and calcites of ore. (c) Cumulative probability histogram of ϵNd(t) values of apatites enclosed in clinopyroxenes of clinopyroxenite. (d) Weighted mean diagram of (87Sr/86Sr)i values of apatites enclosed in clinopyroxenes of clinopyroxenite.

Figure 18

Fig. 15. (a) La/Ba versus La/Nb discrimination diagram after Saunders et al. (1992); (b) Ba/La versus Th/Yb discrimination diagram after Woodhead et al. (2001). HIMU – high-µ; MORB – mid-ocean ridge basalt; OIB – ocean island basalt; CLM – continental lithospheric mantle.

Figure 19

Fig. 16. A schematic cartoon showing the formation model of the Qieganbulake carbonatite-related phosphate ore.

Supplementary material: File

Chen et al. supplementary material

Chen et al. supplementary material

Download Chen et al. supplementary material(File)
File 3.2 MB