Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T05:22:08.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A statistical mass-balance model for reconstruction of LIA ice mass for glaciers in the European Alps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 September 2017

Wolfgang Schöner
Affiliation:
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Hohe Warte 38, A-1190 Vienna, Austria E-mail: wolfgang.schoener@zamg.ac.at
Reinhard Böhm
Affiliation:
Zentralanstalt für Meteorologie und Geodynamik, Hohe Warte 38, A-1190 Vienna, Austria E-mail: wolfgang.schoener@zamg.ac.at
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stepwise linear regression models were calibrated against the measured mass balance of glaciers in the Austrian Alps for the prediction of specific annual net balance and summer balance from climatological and topographical input data. For estimation of winter mass balance, a simple ratio between the amount of winter precipitation and the measured winter balance was used. A ratio with a mean value of 2.0 and a standard deviation of 0.44 was derived from the sample of measured winter balances. Climate input data were taken from the HISTALP database which offers a homogenized data source that is outstanding in terms of its spatial and temporal coverage. Data from the Austrian glacier inventory were used as topographical input data. From the group of possible predictors summer air temperature, winter precipitation, summer snow precipitation and continentality (as defined from seasonal temperature variation) were selected as climatological driving forces in addition to lowest glacier elevation and area-weighted mean glacier elevation as topographical driving forces. Summer temperature explains 60% of the variance of summer mass balance and 39% of the variance of annual mass balance. Additional factors increase the explained variance by 22% for summer and 31% for annual net balance. The calibrated mass-balance model was used to reconstruct the mass balance of Hintereisferner and Vernagtferner back to 1800. Whereas the model performs well for Hintereisferner, it fails for some sub-periods for Vernagtferner due to the complicated flow dynamics of the glacier.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) [year] 2017
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Distribution of glaciers in Austria (white dots) and sample of glaciers with mass-balance measurements (UEA: Übergossene Alm; WUK: Wurtenkees; GOK: Goldbergkees; FLK: Kleinfleißkees; SBK: Stubacher Sonnblickkees; PAS: Pasterze; VER: Vernagtferner; HEF: Hintereisferner; KWF: Kesselwandferner; JAM: Jamtalferner; VMT: Vermuntferner; OCH: Ochsentaler Ferner).

Figure 1

Table 1.Mass-balance measurements in the Austrian Alps

Figure 2

Table 2.Results of the stepwise linear regression model of air temperature predicted from altitude, latitude and longitude for altitude >1500m (derived from a set of 60 Alpine climate stations for 1961–90 mean values). rmse: root-mean-square error

Figure 3

Fig. 2.Curves of tanh fit between monthly air temperature and the fraction of solid precipitation in comparison to the measurements for January, May and August.

Figure 4

Fig. 3.Ratio of winter mass balance to winter precipitation from measured winter mass balances of seven Austrian glaciers plotted against winter precipitation (winter precipitation as derived from HISTALP 1/6˚ gridpoint series).

Figure 5

Fig. 4.Modelled vs measured summer mass balance from ten Austrian glaciers (the model used for prediction of summer mass balance is a stepwise linear regression).

Figure 6

Table 3.Results of the stepwise linear regression model for summer balance, bs, and annual net balance, b, calibrated from mass-balance measurements of Austrian glaciers. Tsum: summer air temperature May–September; Emin: minimum elevation of glacier; Pwin: winter precipitation October–April; Emea: area-weighted mean glacier elevation; PSsum: summer snow precipitation May–September; C: continentality TJul–TJan; R2: explained variance; rmse: root-mean-square error

Figure 7

Fig. 5.Modelled vs measured summer mass balance from ten Austrian glaciers. MOD1: computed by stepwise linear regression calibrated by annual mass-balance data; MOD2: computed as the sum of bw (Fig. 3) and modelled summer mass balance (Fig. 4).

Figure 8

Fig. 6.Time series of measured and modelled annual net balance of Hintereisferner and Kesselwandferner. MOD 1: direct modelling approach; MOD 2: bw + bs.

Figure 9

Fig. 7.Validation of modelled mass balance (MOD 1 and MOD 2) against mass balances determined by geodetic method (GEO) and direct measurements (MEA) for Vernagtferner and Hintereisferner.