Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T00:15:45.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hydrodynamic coupling of a cilia–mucus system in Herschel–Bulkley flows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2024

Q. Mao
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, Centrale Med, M2P2 Marseille, France
U. D'Ortona
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, Centrale Med, M2P2 Marseille, France
J. Favier*
Affiliation:
Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, Centrale Med, M2P2 Marseille, France
*
†Email address for correspondence: julien.favier@univ-amu.fr

Abstract

The yield stress and shear thinning properties of mucus are identified as critical for ciliary coordination and mucus transport in human airways. We use here numerical simulations to explore the hydrodynamic coupling of cilia and mucus with these two properties using the Herschel–Bulkley model, in a lattice Boltzmann solver for the fluid flow. Three mucus flow regimes, i.e. a poorly organized regime, a swirly regime, and a fully unidirectional regime, are observed and analysed by parametric studies. We systematically investigate the effects of ciliary density, interaction length, Bingham number and flow index on the mucus flow regime formation. The underlying mechanism of the regime formation is analysed in detail by examining the variation of two physical quantities (polarization and integral length) and the evolution of the flow velocity, viscosity and shear-rate fields. Mucus viscosity is found to be the dominant parameter influencing the regime formation when enhancing the yield stress and shear thinning properties. The present model is able to reproduce the solid body rotation observed in experiments (Loiseau et al., Nat. Phys., vol. 16, 2020, pp. 1158–1164). A more precise prediction can be achieved by incorporating non-Newtonian properties into the modelling of mucus as proposed by Gsell et al. (Sci. Rep., vol. 10, 2020, 8405).

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Visualization of the computational domain (ciliary density $\phi =0.3$). Cells are discretized using hexagonal elements, with ciliated elements (black) randomly placed during initialization. (b) Closer visualization of the hexagonal elements and the underlying lattice nodes. The black and grey dots represent ciliated and non-ciliated nodes, respectively.

Figure 1

Table 1. Experimental measurements of physical properties.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Final steady contours of non-dimensional vorticity $\omega _z$ (vectors indicate ciliary beating direction, and the colour bar indicates the magnitude of the vorticity) for (a) Newtonian fluid (Bingham number $Bn=0$, flow index $n=1$), and (b) non-Newtonian fluid ($Bn=0.05$, $n=0.9$). Three different mucus flow regimes are shown: PO regime, S regime and FU regime. Part of the computational domain is shown, and the scale bars correspond to $10D$.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The sequential processes of evolution of the different mucus flow regimes ($Bn=0$, $n=1$, $T=250\,\Delta t$): (a) PO regime for $\lambda =1$ (interaction length) and $\phi =0.1$; (b) S regime for $\lambda =1$ and $\phi =0.5$; and (c) FU regime for $\lambda =4$ and $\phi =0.5$. Instantaneous contours of the non-dimensional velocity $U/U_0$ are shown. Part of the computational domain is shown, and the scale bars correspond to $10D$.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Mucus flow regime diagram depending on $\lambda$ and $\phi$ for $Bn=0$ and $n=1$. Symbols are coloured using the values of (a) averaged polarization $\bar {P}$, (b) averaged integral length $\bar {\varLambda }$, and (c) occurrence frequency $f$ of the mucus flow regime. The triangle, circle and square symbols correspond to PO, S and FU regimes, respectively.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Mucus flow regime diagram depending on $\lambda$ and $\phi$ for $Bn=0.05$ and $n=0.9$. Symbols are coloured using the values of (a) $\bar {P}$, (b) $\bar {\varLambda }$, and (c) $f$. The red and black dashed lines represent the boundaries of the non-Newtonian cases ($Bn=0.05$, $n=0.9$) and the Newtonian cases ($Bn=0$, $n=1$), respectively.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Values of (a) $\bar {P}$ and (b) $\bar {\varLambda }$ as functions of $Bn$, for different $\phi$ ($\lambda =1$, $n=1$).

Figure 7

Figure 7. Values of (a) $\bar {P}$ and (b) $\bar {\varLambda }$ as functions of $n$, for different $\phi$ ($\lambda =1$, $Bn=0$).

Figure 8

Figure 8. The sequential process of a transition from the PO regime (instant $a_1$, $Bn=0$) to the S regime (instant $a_2$, $Bn=0.15$) by increasing $Bn$. The steady solution for $Bn=0$ (instant $a_1$) is used as the initial condition for the simulation with $Bn=0.15$. A steady solution for $Bn=0.15$ is obtained at instant $a_2$. Instantaneous contours are coloured by (a) $U/U_0$, (b) dynamic fluid viscosity $\mu$ (whose value at instant $a_1$ corresponds to a Newtonian fluid), and (c) local shear-rate magnitude $\dot \gamma$ ($\lambda =1$, $\phi =0.1$, $n=1$). Part of the computational domain is shown, and the scale bars correspond to $10D$.

Figure 9

Figure 9. (a) Schematic of velocity extraction in the core of a swirl. Distributions of the longitudinal velocity $u_y$ along the radial direction in the core of swirls marked in figure 8(a), for (b) $Bn=0$, and (c) $Bn=0.15$.

Figure 10

Figure 10. The sequential process of a transition from the S regime (instant $a_1$, $Bn=0.15$) to the FU regime (instant $a_3$, $Bn=0.3$) by increasing $Bn$: instantaneous contours of (a) $U/U_0$, (b) $\mu$, and (c) $\dot \gamma$ ($\lambda =1$, $\phi =0.1$, $n=1$). Part of the computational domain is shown, and the scale bars correspond to $10D$.

Figure 11

Figure 11. The sequential process of a transition from the PO regime (instant $a_1$, $n=1$) to the S regime (instant $a_2$, $n=0.6$) by decreasing $n$: instantaneous contours of (a) $U/U_0$, (b) $\mu$ (whose value at instant $a_1$ corresponds to a Newtonian fluid), and (c) $\dot \gamma$ ($\lambda =1$, $\phi =0.1$, $Bn=0$). Part of the computational domain is shown, and the scale bars correspond to $10D$.

Figure 12

Figure 12. The sequential process of a transition from the S regime (instant $a_1$, $n=0.6$) to the FU regime by decreasing $n$ (instant $a_3$, $n=0.3$): instantaneous contours of (a) $U/U_0$, (b) $\mu$, and (c) $\dot \gamma$ ($\lambda =1$, $\phi =0.1$, $Bn=0$). Part of the computational domain is shown, and the scale bars correspond to $10D$.

Figure 13

Figure 13. Averaged shear-rate magnitude $\bar {\dot \gamma }$ as a function of (a) $Bn$ ($\lambda =1$, $n=1$) and (b) $n$ ($\lambda =1$, $Bn=0$), for different $\phi$.

Figure 14

Figure 14. Effective interaction length $\lambda ^*$ as a function of (a) $Bn$ ($\lambda =1$, $n=1$) and (b) $n$ ($\lambda =1$, $Bn=0$), for different $\phi$.

Figure 15

Figure 15. The value of $\bar P$ as a function of (a) $\lambda$ and (b) $\lambda ^*$, for different $Bn$ ($\phi =0.1$, $n=1$).

Figure 16

Figure 16. The value of $\bar P$ as a function of (a) $\lambda$ and (b) $\lambda ^*$, for different $n$ ($\phi =0.1$, $Bn=0$).