Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T05:27:42.949Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Palaeomagnetic, rock-magnetic and mineralogical investigations of the Lower Triassic Vardebukta Formation from the southern part of the West Spitsbergen Fold and Thrust Belt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2018

KATARZYNA DUDZISZ*
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Księcia Janusza 64, 01-452, Warsaw, Poland
KRZYSZTOF MICHALSKI
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Księcia Janusza 64, 01-452, Warsaw, Poland
RAFAŁ SZANIAWSKI
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Księcia Janusza 64, 01-452, Warsaw, Poland
KRZYSZTOF NEJBERT
Affiliation:
Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Petrology, University of Warsaw, Al. Żwirki i Wigury 93, 02-089 Warsaw, Poland
GEOFFREY MANBY
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum of London, Great Britain, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
*
†Author for correspondence: kdudzisz@igf.edu.pl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Magnetic, petrological and mineralogical data from 13 sites (99 independently oriented samples) of the Lower Triassic rocks located in the SW segment of the West Spitsbergen Fold and Thrust Belt (WSFTB) are presented in order to identify the ferrimagnetic carriers and establish the origin of the natural remanent magnetization (NRM). Volcanic lithoclasts and other detrital resistive grains in which the primary magnetization might endure are present in some samples. On the other hand, petrological studies indicate that sulphide remineralization could have had an important influence on the remagnetization of these rocks. The dominant ferrimagnetic carriers are titanomagnetite and magnetite. While the titanomagnetite may preserve the primary magnetization, the magnetite is a more likely potential carrier of secondary overprints. The complex NRM patterns found in most of the samples may be explained by the coexistence and partial overlapping of components representing different stages of magnetization. Components of both polarities were identified in the investigated material. The reversal test performed on the most stable components that demagnetized above 300°C proved to be negative at the 95% confidence level at any stage of unfolding. They are better grouped, however, after 100% tectonic corrections and the most stable components are clustered in high inclinations (c. 70–80°). This suggests that at least part of the measured palaeomagnetic vectors represent a secondary prefolding magnetic overprint that originated in post-Jurassic time before the WSFTB event. Vitrinite reflectance studies show these rocks have not been subjected to any strong heating (<200°C).

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Contour map of Svalbard showing the distribution of the Triassic rocks (modified after Harland, 1997). Location of the study area is marked by rectangles.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a–c) Geological maps of the sampled areas (map modified after Birkenmajer, 1990; Ohta & Dallmann, 1994). Sampling sites are marked by dots; their names are highlighted in rectangular frames.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Geological maps and cross-sections showing two sampled areas representing different styles of tectonic architecture: (a) the Treskelen–Hyrnefjellet–Condevintoppen area situated along the main zone of WSFTB deformation; and (b) the Polakfjellet area situated outside the main area of WSFTB deformation. Selected palaeomagnetic sites are highlighted by dots; maps and cross-sections are modified after Dallmann (1992).

Figure 3

Figure 4. Field photographs of sampling areas: (a) the Hyrnefjellet Anticline; (b) the Treskelen Peninsula; (c) Triasnuten; (d) Kvalfangarbreen; (e) Polakfiellet nunatak; and (f) Drevfiellet nunatak.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Lithological variability between sites located in (a, c, d) Hornsund and (b) Polakfjellet areas. (a) Site BAU, visible NNW–ESE-trending stylolite and a WNW–ESE-aligned recrystallized calcite vein. The stylolite appears to cut through the vein. (b) Site DREV1; observe its irregular WNW–ESE-aligned stylolite. Many grains are sutured and many of the carbonate grains also show two-stage growth with an inclusion-rich core and inclusion-free rim. The top right of the image also shows a recrystallized polygonal coarse-grained inclusion-free vein. (c, d) Generally untwinned, recrystallized calcite veins with no further mineralization inside.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Lithoclasts of (a, b) metamorphic and (c–f) volcanic (magmatic) origin in thin-sections from sites CYP and SOM. (a–d) Photographs from site CYP are characterized by the occurrence of medium- or coarse-grained calcite cement. (e, f) Fine-grained sandstone (site SOM) contains numerous detrital grains of quartz, mica and small lithoclasts. ox – crossed polarization.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Examples of mineralization and mineral alteration in sites (a, b) COND1, (c, d) CYP and (e, f) BAU. Examples of (a, b) detrital grains being replaced by Ti-oxides and goethite; (c, d) Zn-Cu-Fe mineralization; (e, f) pyrite being replaced by goethite. Brk – brookite; Ccp – chalcopyrite; Gt – goethite; Py – pyrite; Rt – rutile; Sp – sphalerite; ox – crossed polarization. All microphotographs were taken under reflected light.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Separated magnetic particles from site CYP. BSE (backscatter electron) images of non-polished specimens derived from EPMA on the left and SEM on the right. (a, b) Low-Ti magnetite grains; (c, d) volcanic lithoclasts with Ti-rich magnetites; and (e, f) pyrite aggregates within carbonate fragments. Amp - amphibole; Cpx - clinopyroxene; Mgt - magnetite; Py - pyrite.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Results of stepwise acquisition of IRM. Dashed lines indicate samples which do not saturate in maximum applied field up to 3 T.

Figure 9

Figure 10 (a–f) Examples of the three-component IRM acquisition curves (Lowrie, 1990). The dashed grey curves indicate susceptibility and the dashed vertical lines indicate the interpreted unblocking temperature.

Figure 10

Figure 11. (a–d) Examples of thermal demagnetization diagrams of the Vardebukta Formation from Torell Land–Hornsund area. Diagrams on the left are equal-area plots, in the middle are orthogonal (Zijderveld) projections and on the right are the NRM intensity decay curves during thermal demagnetization with marked temperature where susceptibility increased. (e) Examples of AF demagnetization; projections are presented in in situ position. On the equal-area projection (left) open/full symbols represent upper/lower hemisphere; on the orthogonal projection (centre) open/full symbols denote projections onto vertical/horizontal planes and arrows indicate identified NRM components.

Figure 11

Table 1. Orientation and statistical parameters of the palaeomagnetic directions identified in Vardebukta Formation (this study).

Figure 12

Figure 12. Distribution of the sites means with α95 < 16; κ > 10 (a) in situ and (b) after tectonic correction, Vardebukta Formation, Torell Land–Hornsund area. Mean site directions are shown with α95 confidence cones, lower hemisphere, equal-area projection.

Figure 13

Table 2. Palaeopoles calculated from the C and AF components in the Vardebukta Formation, with site means of α95 < 16° and κ > 10, Torell Land Hornsund area, southern Spitsbergen.

Figure 14

Figure 13. Stereographic projection showing direction of magnetization for all specimens with MAD values of < 10; 95% confidence cones were calculated separately for both polarities in (a) in situ position and (b) after unfolding.

Figure 15

Figure 14. Distribution of the C components in investigated sites of the Vardebukta Formation (a) in situ and (b) after tectonic correction. Analyses were performed on the level of palaeomagnetic specimens. Red colour indicates dip > 40°. All directions were recalculated into lower hemisphere. Density peaks calculated according to Gaussian counting model, distribution parameter K=100 (Spheristat ver. 3.2.1.). Equal-area projection. Green dots represent expected palaeomagnetic directions calculated for the region of study on the basis of the reference APWP of Baltica given by Torsvik & Cocks (2005).

Figure 16

Figure 15. The position of palaeopoles calculated for the six components which qualified for tectonic interpretations. Projection (a) in an in situ position; and (b) after tectonic correction. Black: Vardebukta Formation palaeopoles are presented with their Dp/Dm ovals of the confidence limit α95; green, Early Triassic palaeopoles derived from previous work; red (1) and blue (2), palaeopoles of Late Mesozoic dolerites obtained by Jeleńska (1987) and Halvorsen (1989), respectively; red dots, reference palaeopoles of the APWP of Baltica. Ages of particular reference palaeopoles (red dots) are given. Reference APWP of Baltica derived from Torsvik & Cocks (2005). References for the Triassic palaeopoles: 3, Nawrocki (1999); 4–6, Hounslow et al. (2008b); 7, 8, Hounslow et al. (2008a); 9–11, Hounslow et al. (2007).

Supplementary material: PDF

Dudzisz et al. supplementary material 1

Dudzisz et al. supplementary material

Download Dudzisz et al. supplementary material 1(PDF)
PDF 1 MB