Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T03:34:38.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parliamentary Report

February–May 2016

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2016

Frank Cranmer*
Affiliation:
Fellow, St Chad's College, Durham Honorary Research Fellow, Centre for Law and Religion, Cardiff University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

On 9 May, the EU Justice Sub-Committee of the House of Lords, chaired by Baroness Helena Kennedy QC, published a report on the Government's proposals to repeal the Human Rights Act and replace it with a new Bill of Rights – and suggested that there was a forceful case for a Government rethink:

The proposals the Secretary of State outlined did not appear to depart significantly from the Human Rights Act – we note in particular that all the rights contained within the ECHR are likely to be affirmed in any British Bill of Rights. His evidence left us unsure why a British Bill of Rights was really necessary. If a Bill of Rights is not intended to change significantly the protection of human rights in the UK, we recommend the Government give careful thought before proceeding with this policy … the repeal of the Human Rights Act and its replacement by a Bill of Rights would be a constitutional change of the greatest significance.

Information

Type
Parliamentary Report
Copyright
Copyright © Ecclesiastical Law Society 2016