Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-skzmx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T08:56:28.132Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Small-mammal species richness and abundance along a tropical altitudinal gradient: an Australian example

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2010

Brooke L. Bateman*
Affiliation:
School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4811
Alex S. Kutt
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Rangelands and Savannas, Davies Laboratory, PMB PO, Aitkenvale, Queensland, Australia 4814
Eric P. Vanderduys
Affiliation:
CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Rangelands and Savannas, Davies Laboratory, PMB PO, Aitkenvale, Queensland, Australia 4814
Jeanette E. Kemp
Affiliation:
Queensland Herbarium, Environmental Protection Agency, PO Box 5391, Townsville, Queensland, Australia 4810
*
1Corresponding author. Email: brooke.bateman@jcu.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This study examined patterns in the species richness and abundance of small non-volant mammals along a tropical altitudinal gradient in north-eastern Australia. We investigated whether a mid-altitudinal peak in diversity was apparent, and if it occurred, whether it was determined by particular environmental conditions. We sampled a small-mammal assemblage at 17 sites distributed along an altitude-environmental gradient from savanna (350 m) to rain-forest vegetation (1000 m). Over four separate occasions (5100 trap-nights) we recorded 17 species of mammal with 416 captures. A positive non-linear relationship between altitude and mammal species richness and abundance was observed, peaking at the 800–900 m range. Many species were distributed across a range of altitudes, while others were strongly associated with particular habitat conditions. There was a distinct reduction in abundance and species richness at low altitudes associated with the less complex vegetation, lower productivity and possible anthropogenic effects. Key findings were: that small-mammal richness peaked towards the summit of the gradient and not at one-half the maximum altitude predicted by the mid-domain effect; contrasting conditions and greatest vegetation juxtaposition had the greatest influence on the patterns recorded; and that local idiosyncratic influences such as habitat factors, land management and historical biogeography are significant.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010
Figure 0

Figure 1. Location of sites and gradient sampled, and location of Brooklyn Station in Queensland.

Figure 1

Table 1. The description of the broad vegetation groups sampled along the altitudinal gradient. Broad vegetation groups follow naming protocols of Accad et al. (2008). The broad floristic description of each habitat is as follows: RFE = Complex notophyll vine forest and ecotone woodland of Eucalyptus grandis, with understorey rain-forest elements, WTOF = E. resinifera, E. reducta, Corymbia intermedia, Syncarpia glomulifera, Allocasuarina torulosa and Banksia aquilonia tall open forest, DOF = Eucalyptus reducta, E. portuensis, E. tereticornis, Corymbia intermedia, C. citriodora, C. stockeri open forest, DOW = Eucalyptus cullenii, E. portuensis, Corymbia stockeri low open woodland and DAW = Eucalyptus platyphylla and E. leptophleba open woodland.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Estimated species accumulation curves (Chao 2) for the small-mammal species richness across six altitudinal bands. Cumulative trapping days are the four survey periods assessed combined in sequence.

Figure 3

Figure 3. The relationship between the distribution of total mammal abundance (pooled over the four surveys) and species richness across the altitude gradient as identified via generalized linear modelling. Relationship with species richness (y = e(0.21 + (0.0016 x))) (a). A normal distribution with a log-link function was used. Relationship with abundance (y = e(-0.40 + (0.005 x))) (b). A normal distribution with a log-link function was used.

Figure 4

Figure 4. The relationship between the distribution of total mammal abundance (pooled over the four surveys), for selected species across the altitude gradient as identified via generalized linear modelling. Relationship with Melomys cervinipes (solid line) (y = e(-6.4 + (0.01x))) and Rattus fuscipes (dashed line) (y = e(-7.2 + (0.011x))) abundance (a). A Poisson distribution with a log-link function was used. Relationship with Dasyurus hallucatus (solid line) (y = –7.8 + 0.03x – 0.000023x2), Zyzomys argurus (dotted line) (y = –17.6 + 0.07x – 0.000049x2) and Melomys burtoni (dashed line) (y = –18.6 + 0.06x – 0.000044x2) abundance (b). A polynomial distribution was used.

Figure 5

Table 2. Species richness, abundance and habitat measures and individual species abundances for altitude bands. n = number of sites that a species was recorded. Data tabulated are the mean scores ± SE. Other data are totals. Variation in mean site richness, abundance, habitat measures and species was examined using non-parametric analysis of variance (Kruskal–Wallis). H is the test statistic for this ANOVA.

Figure 6

Figure 5. The mean, SE and range of altitudinal distribution of each small-mammal species recorded in this study. Each distribution is weighted by total abundance; that is weighting adjusts the contribution of individual cases (e.g. altitudes) within the range plots in proportion to the values of a selected variable (e.g. abundance of mammal). Species codes are as follows: Anad = Antechinus adustus, Anfl = Antechinus flavipes, Daha = Dasyurus hallucatus, SmiA = Sminthopsis sp. A, SmiB = S. sp. B, Mebu =, Melomys burtoni, Mece = M. cervinipes, Mumu = Mus musculus, Psde = Pseudomys delicatulus, Psgr = P. gracilicaudatus, Rafu = Rattus fuscipes, Rale = R. leucopes, Raso = R. sordidus, Urca = Uromys caudimaculata, Zyar = Zyzomys argurus. Perameles nasuta was recorded from a single individual from a single site and as such is not illustrated.