Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-mnklg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T13:23:14.495Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of umbilical culture for surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among neonates admitted to neonatal intensive care units

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2022

Toshinori NakashimaOpen the ORCID record for Toshinori Nakashima[Opens in a new window],
Hirosuke Inoue,
Yoshihiro Sakemi and
Hironori Yamashita
Toshinori Nakashima*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Kokura Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
Hirosuke Inoue
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
Yoshihiro Sakemi
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Kokura Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
Hironori Yamashita
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, National Hospital Organization Kokura Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
*
Author for correspondence: Toshinori Nakashima, E-mail: nakashima.toshinori.jq@mail.hosp.go.jp
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To compare the culture sensitivities of MRSA detection, we collected 988 paired umbilical and nasal cultures from screened neonates. MRSA positivity rates were 79.1% from umbilicus and 41.9% from nares (P = .01). The umbilicus was a more useful culture site than the nares for surveillance of MRSA among neonates upon admission.

Information

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 44 , Issue 6 , June 2023, pp. 988 - 990
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) plays a significant role in healthcare-associated transmission,Reference Morioka, Yahata and Shibata1 and patient colonization with MRSA increases the risk of infections in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).Reference Huang, Chou, Su, Lien and Lin2 Most hospitalized neonates are premature, have low birth weight, and require invasive medical devices; therefore, performing active surveillance cultures and placing MRSA-colonized neonates under contact precautions is essential to preventing transmission and outbreaks in the NICU.

Some variability exists between culture sites, including the nares, umbilicus, rectum, axilla, groin, and oropharynx. Although nasal culture is used most often for surveillance,Reference Milstone, Song, Coffin and Elward3 the efficacy of extranasal sites for MRSA detection remains unknown. In the current study, umbilical and nasal cultures were collected for the surveillance of MRSA upon NICU admission. The sensitivities of those cultures were compared.

Methods

Inclusion and exclusion criteria of study population

This study included neonates who were admitted to the Kokura Medical Center level 3 NICU in Fukuoka, Japan, within 14 days of life from January 2010 to June 2015. Neonates admitted after the first 14 days of life, or those whose umbilical or nasal cultures were not obtained upon admission, were excluded.

MRSA surveillance

Nare culture samples were collected from the nasal vestibule (Fig. 1A), and umbilical culture samples were collected from the umbilical stump during the first 2 days of life (Fig. 1B). The umbilical cord dries out at ∼48 hours after birth, so the stump and base around the umbilicus were collected after the first 2 days of life (Fig. 1C). The samples were collected and incubated at 36°C for 18–20 hours. After colonies were subcultured, direct rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were performed using the VITEK 2 system (BioMerieux, Craponne, France). MRSA was detected by the automated system (VITEK 2) using a cefoxitin screen and confirmed with the select agar (Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan).

Fig. 1.

Collection from sample sites for surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at admission. (A) nares at day 0, (B) umbilicus at day 0, (C) umbilicus at day 3.

Statistical analyses

Differences in the positivity rate were estimated using the McNemar test. Because there were no false-positive results in the bacterial culture, the sensitivity and the negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated using specificity and positive predictive values of 100%. Results with a 2-sided P value <.05 were considered significant. We used the software program EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan). This study was approved by the internal review board of Kokura Medical Center. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or guardians of the neonates.

Results

In total, 2,090 neonates were admitted to the NICU during the study period. We excluded 1,050 neonates whose cultures were not taken from either the umbilicus or the nare and 52 neonates who were admitted after the first 14 days of life. Paired nasal and umbilical cultures were collected from the remaining 988 neonates. The neonates were born at a median gestational age of 37.4 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 35.9–39.3) and had a median birth weight of 2,608 grams (IQR, 2,182–3,038). Fewer than half (44.8%) were outborn, and the median age on admission was 2 days (IQR, 2–4). The rate of vaginal delivery was 60.5%. Of the study neonates, 43 (4.4%) were colonized with MRSA, but none were infected.

Of the 43 colonized neonates, 34 (79.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 64.0%–90.0%) had MRSA-positive umbilical swabs and 18 (41.9%; 95% CI, 27.0%–57.9%) had positive nasal swabs. Differences in the frequency of MRSA detection were statistically significant (P = .01). The NPVs were 99.1% (IQR, 98.2%–99.6%) at the umbilicus and 97.4% (IQR, 96.2%–98.3%) at the nares (Table 1). Different collection methods were used to obtain umbilical cultures during and after the first 2 days of life; therefore, the sensitivities and NPVs of neonates admitted were obtained at both time points. The results were similar during the first 2 days of life but differed significantly after the first 2 days of life. Of 37 colonized neonates, 31 (83.8%; 95% CI, 68.0%–93.8%) had a positive umbilical swab and 15 (40.5%; 95% CI, 24.8%–57.9%) had a positive nasal swab (P < .01). When the infants were divided into inborn and outborn groups, the umbilical culture had a higher positive rate than the nasal culture in both groups. However, the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Table 1.

Sensitivity and Negative Predictive Value of Umbilical and Nasal Culture for MRSA

Note. CI, confidence interval.

Discussion

The umbilicus is a common reservoir for S. aureus,Reference Watkinson and Dyas4 which first colonizes the umbilical stump and then spreads to the other sites in the body.Reference Rosenthal, White, Churilla, Brodie and Katz5 However, no prior studies have compared the efficacy of umbilical and nasal cultures at the time of NICU admission. This study assessed the usefulness of screening neonate umbilical cultures for MRSA upon admission to the NICU. The sensitivity for MRSA detection was higher for umbilical cultures than for nasal cultures.

Previous consensus statements for the management of MRSA outbreaks in NICUs have recommended using only nares or nasopharyngeal cultures for MRSA detection.Reference Gerber, Jones and Scott6 Although different institutions have obtained MRSA surveillance cultures from a range of body sites, the nasal culture is the most frequently used.Reference Milstone, Song, Coffin and Elward3,Reference Suga, Hoshina, Ichikawa, Araki and Kusuhara7 There is no general consensus about the most cost-effective and optimal culture sites for MRSA surveillance among neonates. Because the sampling tools and culture methods for umbilical and nasal cultures are the same, if one sampling site is selected as the MRSA screening at the time of NICU admission, the umbilicus may be a better choice than the nare from a cost-effectiveness perspective.

Few studies have assessed effective culture sites for MRSA screening at the time of NICU admission, and none have included umbilical culture, to the best of our knowledge. Although the detection rate of MRSA at the time of admission is dependent on its prevalence in the geographic area and the sampling methods, it may be possible to detect additional MRSA carriers using umbilical culture.

The present study indicated that umbilical culture was more sensitive especially after the first 2 days of life. A wet pocket-like structure between the base of the umbilicus and the surrounding skin appears shortly after the first 2 days of life (Fig. 1C), which may be suitable for bacterial propagation including MRSA.

It has been reported that MRSA is frequently detected in neonatal umbilical omphalitis.Reference Sengupta, Banerjee, Banerjee and Guchhait8 Furthermore, MRSA screening by nasal culture has been reported to be helpful as an antimicrobial stewardship tool with a high NPV to avoid the administration of empiric anti-MRSA drugs.Reference Carr, Daley, Givens Merkel and Rose9,Reference Mergenhagen, Starr, Wattengel, Lesse, Sumon and Sellick10 In this study, we detected no MRSA infections on admission or subsequent infections in the carriers. However, the umbilical culture showed higher sensitivity and NPV than the nasal culture, suggesting that the umbilical culture might be more beneficial than the nasal culture for identifying MRSA infection and avoiding the use of empiric anti-MRSA drugs in the early postnatal period if the prevalence of MRSA is low.

This study had several limitations. First, it was performed with patients from a single institution, and the sensitivity of umbilical culture may differ between epidemic situations and environments. Second, almost half of the admitted neonates were excluded because data on umbilical and/or nasal culture was lacking.

In conclusion, umbilical culture detected MRSA at the time of NICU admission at a higher rate than nasal culture, and it would be helpful for identifying carriers and preventing horizontal transmission. Further studies are needed to determine whether MRSA screening by umbilical culture is beneficial not only to prevent the spread of MRSA colonization but also as a tool for antimicrobial stewardship.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the clinical laboratory technicians of the microbiology laboratories at our institution, as well as Edanz (https://jp.edanz.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Financial support

No financial support was provided relevant to this article.

Conflicts of interest

All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

References

Morioka, I, Yahata, M, Shibata, A, et al. Impact of pre-emptive contact precautions for outborn neonates on the incidence of healthcare-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission in a Japanese neonatal intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 2013;84:66–70.10.1016/j.jhin.2012.12.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, YC, Chou, YH, Su, LH, Lien, RI, Lin, TY. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization and its association with infection among infants hospitalized in neonatal intensive care units. Pediatrics 2006;118:469–474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milstone, AM, Song, X, Coffin, S, Elward, A, et al. Identification and eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in the neonatal intensive care unit: results of a national survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2010;31:766–768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watkinson, M, Dyas, A. Staphylococcus aureus still colonizes the untreated neonatal umbilicus. J Hosp Infect 1992;21:131–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenthal, A, White, D, Churilla, S, Brodie, S, Katz, KC. Optimal surveillance culture sites for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in newborns. J Clin Microbiol 2006;44:4234–4236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerber, SI, Jones, RC, Scott, MV, et al. Management of outbreaks of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in the neonatal intensive care unit: a consensus statement. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:139–145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suga, S, Hoshina, T, Ichikawa, S, Araki, S, Kusuhara, K. A survey of the implementation status of selected infection control strategies in neonatal intensive care units in Japan. J Hosp Infect 2020;104:200–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sengupta, M, Banerjee, S, Banerjee, P, Guchhait, P. Outstanding prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in neonatal omphalitis. J Clin Diagn Res 2016;10:DM01–DM03.Google ScholarPubMed
Carr, AL, Daley, MJ, Givens Merkel, K, Rose, DT. Clinical utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal screening for antimicrobial stewardship: a review of current literature. Pharmacotherapy 2018;38:1216–1228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mergenhagen, KA, Starr, KE, Wattengel, BA, Lesse, AJ, Sumon, Z, Sellick, JA. Determining the utility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nares screening in antimicrobial stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 2020;71:1142–1148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Collection from sample sites for surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at admission. (A) nares at day 0, (B) umbilicus at day 0, (C) umbilicus at day 3.

Figure 1

Table 1.Sensitivity and Negative Predictive Value of Umbilical and Nasal Culture for MRSA