Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T02:53:22.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular reorientation in a dehydration process of an organic polar salt of 2,4-diaminotoluene/L(+)-tartaric acid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2017

Weicai Ju
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, No. 5 Xinmofan Road, Nanjing, China
Simin Qiu
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, No. 5 Xinmofan Road, Nanjing, China
Yaqiu Tao
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, No. 5 Xinmofan Road, Nanjing, China
Xiaodong Shen
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, No. 5 Xinmofan Road, Nanjing, China
Zhigang Pan*
Affiliation:
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, No. 5 Xinmofan Road, Nanjing, China
*
a) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail: panzhigang@njtech.edu.cn

Abstract

An organic polar hydrate was obtained through cocrystallization of 2,4-diaminotoluene (2,4-DAT) and L(+)-tartaric acid (TA) from ethanol. Dehydration behavior of the obtained hydrate was investigated using variable temperature powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and thermal analysis. Proton transfer from L(+)-TA to 2,4-DAT in both hydrate and dehydrated form was revealed via Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The crystal structures of both forms were determined using PXRD techniques. The similarities and differences between two crystal structures were analyzed and the role of water in the hydrate crystal structure was demonstrated.

Information

Type
Technical Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Centre for Diffraction Data 2017 
Figure 0

Scheme 1.

Figure 1

Figure 1. (Color online) Le Bail fit (a) and Rietveld refinement (b) of 1 showing the experimental pattern (solid red line), the simulated pattern (green crosses), and the difference between the simulated and experimental data (black lower line). Tick marks indicate the reflection positions.

Figure 2

Table I. Fractional coordinates of non-hydrogen atoms of 1.

Figure 3

Figure 2. (Color online) Hydrogen bonding interactions around TA (a) and 2,4-DAT (b) in 1. H atoms have been omitted for clarity. Carbon atoms are shown in dark gray, nitrogen in blue, and oxygen in red. Dashed lines represent hydrogen bonds. Symmetry code: (a) i (1 + x, y, z); ii (−1 + x, y, z); iii (x, y, −1 + z); iv (x, y, 1 + z); v (x, y, z); vi (2–x, 0.5 + y, 2–z); vii (2–x, 0.5 + y, 1–z); viii (1–x, 0.5 + y, 2–z); ix (2–x, 0.5 + y, 2–z). (b) i (−x, −0.5 + y, 1–z); ii (−x, −0.5 + y, 2–z); iii (1 + x, y, 1 + z); iv (1–x, −0.5 + y, 2–z); v (1–x, −0.5 + y, 1–z).

Figure 4

Figure 3. (Color online) Packing diagram of the crystal structure of 1 viewed along the c-axis, showing the 2,4-DAT and TA molecules arranged in separate stacks, which alternate along the b-axis. H atoms have been omitted for clarity. Color code is as in Figure 2.

Figure 5

Figure 4. (Color online) Variable temperature PXRD patterns of 1.

Figure 6

Figure 5. (Color online) Le Bail fit (a) and Rietveld refinement (b) of 2 showing the experimental pattern (solid red line), the simulated pattern (green crosses), and the difference between the simulated and experimental data (black lower line). Tick marks indicate the reflection positions.

Figure 7

Figure 6. (Color online) Hydrogen bonding arrangements in 2. Color code is as in Figure 2. Symmetry code: (a) i (1 + x, y, z); ii (−1 + x, y, z); iii (x, y, −1 + z); iv (x, y, 1 + z); v (1 + x, 0.5 + y, 1–z); vi (x, y, −1 + z); vii (−x, 0.5 + y, 1–z); viii (−x, 0.5 + y, 2–z). (b) i (x, y, 1 + z); ii (1–x, −0.5 + y, 1–z); iii (−x, −0.5 + y, 1−z); iv (−x, −0.5 + y, 2–z).

Figure 8

Figure 7. (Color online) Packing diagram of the crystal structure of 2 viewed along the c-axis, showing the 2,4-DAT and TA molecules arranged in separate stacks, which alternate along the b-axis. H atoms have been omitted for clarity.

Figure 9

Table II. Fractional coordinates of non-hydrogen atoms of 2.

Figure 10

Figure 8. An overlay of the unit cells of 1 (dark gray) and 2 (light gray) viewed approximately along the c-axis showing different orientations of the 2,4-DAT molecules, while the TA molecules are superimposed.

Figure 11

Figure 9. (Color online) Comparison of packing diagrams of the crystal structure of 1 and 2 viewed approximately along the c-axis. Color code is as in Figure 2. Dashed lines represent hydrogen bonds.

Figure 12

Table III. Crystal data and structure refinement for 1 and 2.

Figure 13

Table IV. Hydrogen bonding and distances in 1 and 2.

Figure 14

Figure 10. (Color online) TGA–DSC pattern of 1.

Supplementary material: File

Ju supplementary material

Ju supplementary material 1

Download Ju supplementary material(File)
File 1.1 MB