Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T13:41:18.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Synthesis strategies for improving the performance of doped-BaZrO3 materials in solid oxide fuel cell applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2013

Lei Bi
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, Solar and Photovoltaics Engineering Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
Enrico Traversa*
Affiliation:
Physical Sciences and Engineering Division, Solar and Photovoltaics Engineering Research Center, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: enrico.traversa@kaust.edu.sa

Abstract

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) offer an efficient energy conversion technology for alleviating current energy problems. High temperature proton-conducting (HTPC) oxides are promising electrolytes for this technology, since their activation energy is lower than that of conventional oxygen-ion conductors, enabling the operating temperature reduction at 600 °C. Among HTPC oxides, doped BaZrO3 materials possess high chemical stability, needed for practical applications. Though, poor sinterability and the resulting large volume of highly resistive grain boundaries hindered their deployment for many years. Nonetheless, the recently demonstrated high proton conductivity of the bulk revived the attention on doped BaZrO3, stimulating research on solving the sintering issues. The proper selection of dopants and sintering aids was demonstrated to be successful for improving the BaZrO3 electrolyte sinterability. We here briefly review the synthesis strategies proposed for preparing BaZrO3-based nanostructured powders for electrolyte and electrodes, with the aim to improve the SOFC performance.

Information

Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Schematic diagram comparing BZY powders synthesized by solid-state reaction and wet chemical routes.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Comparison of pellet conductivities of BZY synthesized by different methods: solid-state reaction,25 sol–gel,29 and sol–gel with reactive sintering.46 The inset pictures are scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs showing the morphology of the corresponding tested BZY pellets. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 29, Copyright 2008, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 46, Copyright 2009, American Chemical Society.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. (a) TEM micrograph of BaZrO3 nanopowders synthesized by a one-step combustion method72; (b) SEM micrograph of the BaZrO3 pellet obtained from the said BaZrO3 nanopowders after sintering at 1650 °C72; (c) SEM micrograph of BaZrO3-based pellet obtained from the powder prepared by solid-state reaction after sintering at 1720 °C52; (d) SEM micrograph of BaZrO3-based pellet obtained from the powder prepared by solid-state reaction after sintering at 2200 °C.52 Reproduced with permission from Ref. 52, Copyright 2007, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 72, Copyright 2008, Elsevier.

Figure 3

TABLE I. Characteristics of BaZrO3-based materials synthesized by different methods reported in the literature. N/A means the information is not provided in the literature.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Comparison of the conductivity of ZnO-modified BZY pellets at different temperatures. The ZnO-modified BZY powders were synthesized by a solid-state reaction81 and a combustion method.82

Figure 5

FIG. 5. Schematic diagram of the reactions occurring at composite cathodes made of a mixture of proton conductor and electron conductor and a mixture of mixed proton–electron conductor and electron conductor. The red area (including the light-red area) represents the active site for electrochemical reactions.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. SEM micrographs of (a) BZY10, (b) BZPY30, and (c) LSCF powders synthesized by a combustion method.98 Reproduced with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry. Copyright 2011, The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 7

FIG. 7. Comparison of ASR of LSCF-BZPY30 cathode with other composite cathodes for proton-conducting SOFCs, including Pr0.58Sr0.4Fe0.8Co0.2O3−δ-BaCe0.9Yb0.1O3−δ (PSFC-BCYb),99 PrBaCo2O5+x-BaCe0.7Zr0.1Y0.2O3−δ (PBCO-BCZY),100 La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ-BaCe0.9Yb0.1O3−δ (LSCF-BCYb),37 and Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3−δ-BaCe0.8Sm0.2O3−δ (SSC-BCS).33 Reproduced with permission from Ref. 24. Copyright 2012, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Figure 8

FIG. 8. SEM micrographs for BZY–Ni anodes prepared by different routes,104 with a schematic diagram of the particle distribution. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 104. Copyright 2011, The Electrochemical Society.

Figure 9

TABLE II. Summary of the performance of BaZrO3-based fuel cells reported in the literature. BZY: Y doped BaZrO3; BZI: In-doped BaZrO3; BZPY: Pr and Y co-doped BaZrO3.

Figure 10

FIG. 9. SEM cross-sectional micrograph of a fuel cell with a thin film BZY electrolyte 650-nm thick prepared by PLD, with the ohmic loss (iR) and polarization loss (η) of the cell at testing temperature.112 Reproduced with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry. Copyright 2010, The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 11

FIG. 10. The increase in performance for BaZrO3-based fuel cells with the years. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 66, Copyright 2008, Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH&Co. KGaA , Weinheim. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 106, Copyright 2009, Elsevier. Reproduced with permission from Ref. 108, Copyright 2010, Elsevier. Ref. 91—Reproduced with permission from The Royal Society of Chemistry, Copyright 2011, The Royal Society of Chemistry.