Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T11:24:30.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Routes to self-assembly of nanorods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2013

Karthik Ramasamy*
Affiliation:
Center for Materials for Information Technology and Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487
Arunava Gupta*
Affiliation:
Center for Materials for Information Technology and Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: kramasamy@mint.ua.edu

Abstract

Self-assembled nanostructures often exhibit unique properties that are distinct from those of bulk materials. During the past decade, significant progress has been made in the assembly of nanorods and understanding some of the self-directing assembly mechanisms, particularly related to gold nanorods. Nonetheless, methods that can be scaled up to large areas for device-scale applications are yet to be established. This review describes various routes that are being actively pursued to achieve assembly of nanorods. Self-assembly methods that utilize external forces such as electric field or gravitational forces are reviewed. Additionally, self-assembly schemes using chemical and biomolecule linkers are presented. Other important routes, such as template assisted assembly, Langmuir-Blodgett, and nanorod assembly methods carried out in solution phase are also discussed. The latter includes recently reported approaches to produce superstructured particles through self-assembly. Solvent evaporation and drying can also strongly contribute to the assembly of nanostructures. The final section presents self-assembly routes that primarily exploit the drying kinetics of solvents.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Schematic of electrode assembly for nanorod alignment. (a) 3D drawing. Each electrode measures 35 × 15 × 5 mm and is separated at a distance of 1.2 mm. The electrode assembly in a horizontal orientation is placed in a glass vial with 1 mL of toluene to create a saturated atmosphere. (b) 2D close up of trapped meniscus. The substrate (carbon-coated electron microscopy grid or silicon nitride membrane window) is placed between the electrodes, and 50 µL of nanorod toluene solution is deposited forming a meniscus between the upper and lower electrode. Reprinted with permission from Ryan et al.,22 copyright 2006 American Chemical Society.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Superstructure shape control. (a) SEM image of the pores of a bare AAO membrane used as a template for nanorod generation. (b) The AAO template is patterned with photoresist (darker elevated pattern). The areas covered by photoresist are not exposed to the plating/polymerization solution and rods are electrochemically deposited exclusively in the uncovered areas (rods are the light areas at the bottom of the template). (c) After the template is removed the rods assemble into a superstructure (in this case a hemisphere) whose shape is determined by the photoresist pattern in conjunction with the template. The insets show typical two-part AuPpy rods, which comprise the curved superstructures. (d) A scheme showing each step of the assembly process. Scale bars in panels a, b, and c are 2, 300, and 100 μm, respectively. Inset scale bars are 1 μm. Reprinted with permission from Ciszek et al.,27 copyright 2010 American Chemical Society.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. (a) Dark-field TEM image of Au-tipped CdSe NRs in toluene, taken 1 h after NR preparation. (b) Dark field TEM image (top view) of the close-packed NR array, inset shows the magnified image and the scale bar represents 50 nm (c, d) Side view SEM images of the NR arrays. TEM and SEM images in (b–d) were taken 1 day after the addition of dimethylformamide solution of MUA. Reprinted with permission from Zhao et al.,37 copyright 2009 American Chemical Society. (e) Solution-based self-assembly of single-tip Au-CdSe NRs. Reprinted with permission from Zhao et al.,38 copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. (a and b) Top view SEM images of vertical nanorod assembly by solution method. Side and top view TEM images of nanorods assembly [inset to (a and b)]. Reprinted with permission from Ramasamy et al.,46 copyright 2012 Royal Society of Chemistry.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. (a) Scheme for the synthesis of superparticles from CdSe-CdS nanorods: (i) nanorod-micelle formation, (ii) superparticle formation. Numbered images: (1) Proposed model for a CdSe-CdS nanorod functionalized with ODPA and octylamine; (2) proposed model for a nanorod micelle prepared using DTAB; (3) proposed model for a double-domed cylinder; (4) proposed model for an irregular-multidomain particle. (b–p) TEM images of superparticles made from nanorods of l = 28.0 ± 1.5 nm and d = 6.7 ± 0.3 nm. Reprinted with permission from Wang et al.,50 copyright 2012 American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. TEM images of (a) di-, (b) tri-, and (c) tetra-gold nanorods assembly. The antimouse IgG provides an anchoring site at the end surface of nanorod and interacts with mouse IgG for assembly. (d) Gold nanorods were assembled into successive chains via stepwise increasing the concentration of mouse IgG. Reprinted with permission from Chang et al.,54 copyright 2005 Royal Society of Chemistry. (e) Illustration of surface modification of Au NR with DPPTE and 1D and 2D self-assembled configurations of the NR complex on a solid surface. Reprinted with permission from Nakashima et al.,58 copyright 2008 American Chemical Society. TEM images (taken prior to separation) of (f) dimers of NDBs in different conjugation angles, (g) trimers, and (h) flowers (50 nm scale bars). Reprinted with permission from Salant et al.,57 copyright 2006 American Chemical Society.

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Images of liquid crystalline phase in concentrated solution of CdSe nanocrystals under a polarizing optical microscope. Isotropic phase appears dark in these images. All the bright areas in the image correspond to the liquid crystalline phase, with dark lines corresponding to disclinations or the area where the orientation of the nanorods are parallel to either of the polarizers. (a) Droplets of liquid crystalline phase mixed with isotropic phase. (b) Interface between a big liquid crystalline droplet (right) and isotropic phase (left). (c and d) Disclinations of strength of 1/2 (c) and 1 (d), respectively. The arrows point to the disclinations. Reprinted with permission from Li et al.,63 copyright 2002 American Chemical Society.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. TEM images of CdS nanorods with concentration (a) 8 × 10−7 mol/L, (b) 1.4 × 10−6 mol/L, (c) 2.1 × 10−6 mol/L, and (d) 3.2 × 10−6 mol/L. The optimum concentration was found to be 2.1 × 10−6 mol/L where closed-packed 2D superlattice of CdS nanorods with inset HRTEM image in (c) shows the monodispersity of nanorods. (e–f) HRSEM images showing monolayer and multilayer, vertically oriented CdS nanrods. (g) Schematic representation shows the progression of the nanorod assembly in different stages of droplet drying for different concentrations, the nucleation of the assemblies in the droplet for optimum concentration and further growth process of nanorod assembly is shown in gIII. Reprinted with permission from Singh et al.,79 copyright 2012 Royal Society of Chemistry.