Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-7pwfn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-12T19:16:58.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconstructing desecuritisation: the normative-political in the Copenhagen School and directions for how to apply it – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2012

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Information

Type
Erratum
Information
Review of International Studies , Volume 38 , Issue 4 , October 2012, pp. 929
Copyright
Copyright © British International Studies Association 2012

The publishers regret that a number of small errors were published in ‘Reconstructing desecuritisation: the normative-political in the Copenhagen Shool and directions for how to apply it’Footnote 1

On p. 527, the quote by Aradau in paragraph two should correctly read ‘a Foucauldian-inspired desecuritizing move’.

On p. 534 the last sentence of the second paragraph should read: Wæver's insistence on there being instances, where we would indeed want to securitise, also leads him to criticise ‘hard-core’ post-structuralists, who seek to open up, avoid making choices, and who recommends ‘living dangerously’.

In the Rearticulation paragraph on pp. 542–3, the two instances of ‘change stabilisation through’ should read ‘change through stabilisation’.

The year range given for the wars discussed in the second paragraph should read 1864 (not as it currently does, 1864–4)

Fn. 85 should read Behnke, ‘No Way Out’, p. 65, and fn. 86; Ibid., p. 64.

References

1 Hansen, Lene, ‘Reconstructing desecuritisation: the normative-political in the Copenhagen School and directions for how to apply it’, Review of International Studies, 38:3 (2012), pp. 525–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar.