Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:10:20.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magma chamber evolution of the Ardestan pluton, Central Iran: evidence from mineral chemistry, zircon composition and crystal size distribution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2019

Shahrouz Babazadeh
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Earth Sciences, Geological Survey of Iran, Tehran13185-1494, Iran
Tanya Furman*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA16802, USA
John M. Cottle
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Science University of California, Santa Barbara, CA93106-9630, USA
Davood Raeisi
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, 14155-64155, Iran
Ianna Lima
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA16802, USA Department of Geosciences, Federal University of Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Brazil
*
*Author for correspondence: Tanya Furman, Email: furman@psu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Oligo–Miocene Ardestan quartz diorite to tonalite is part of widespread Cenozoic magmatism within the Urumieh–Dokhtar Magmatic Assemblage of Iran. The Ardestan pluton is composed mainly of varying proportions of plagioclase feldspar (normally zoned from bytownite to andesine), amphibole (magnesio-hornblende) and biotite. Biotite exhibits a range of Al values (~2–2.8 apfu) over very restricted Fe# ratios (0.42–0.56) which are characteristic of continental arc magmatic suites. High Ti2O contents of biotite (<6.1 wt.%) suggest a magmatic origin. Ti-in-biotite geothermometery gives a mean crystallisation temperature of 730 ± 56°C, slightly higher than calculated TZr.Ti°C (716 ± 50°C) and similar to the average TZr.sat°C (735 ± 26°C). These results are consistent with the low bulk-rock SiO2 contents, which provide minimum estimates of temperature and indicate zircon crystallised from a fractionated magma. Zircons from the Ardestan pluton have high (Sm/La)N (>10) ratios suggesting a magmatic origin. T–$f_{{\rm O}_{\rm 2}}$ calculations of oxygen fugacity between –13.6 to –16.9 indicate oxidising crystallisation conditions between the Ni–NiO (NNO) and Fe2O3–Fe3O4 (HM) buffers. Tight linear trends of log (XF/XOH), log (XCl/XOH) and log (XCl/XOH) vs. XMg represent a narrow range of $f_{{\rm H}_2O}$, fHF and fHCl, clearly indicating that physico-chemical conditions were essentially constant throughout the formation of magmatic biotite. The shape of crystal size distribution curves along with the medium Al and Mg contents in amphibole and biotite, respectively, are consistent with a history of magma mixing involving injections of basic magma into the evolving felsic chamber. Calculated residence time for Ardestan plagioclase crystals of ~630 years support field evidence that these plutons were emplaced at shallow depths.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2019
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Simplified overview map of Iran showing the major structural units (modified after Alavi, 1996) and the location of the area investigated. SaSZ – Sanandaj–Sirjan zone; ZFTB – the Zagros folded-thrust belt.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Photomicrographs of Ardestan plutonic rocks. Mineral assemblages of plagioclase, hornblende and biotite in the medium-grained quartz dioritic – tonalitic rocks. (a) Sample AR14; (b) sample AR10; (c) sample AR2; and (d) sample AR22. Pl = plagioclase; Hbl = hornblende; Bt = biotite; Qtz = quartz.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Bulk geochemical classification diagrams for plutonic rocks from the Ardestan intrusions. (a) The parameters R1 and R2 (De la Roche et al., 1980) and multi-cation tectonic discrimination diagram of Batchelor and Bowden (1985) indicate a calc-alkaline tonalitic to dioritic composition. (b) A/CNK vs. A/NK (Maniar and Piccoli, 1989) indicate that the melts are metaluminous I-type granitoids. (c) SiO2vs. K2O variations demonstrate that the samples belong to the calc-alkaline series.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Major- and selected trace-element Harker variation diagrams from the Ardestan plutonic rocks.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Ab–An–Or ternary plot of compositions (mol.%) of the cores and rims of plagioclase feldspar.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. (a) Cationic Si vs. Mg/(Mg + Fe2+) variations in Ardestan amphiboles classifies them primarily as magnesio-hornblende. (b) TiO2vs. Al2O3 contents of Ardestan amphiboles (after Jiang and An, 1984) indicate mixing between mantle- and crustally-derived magmas. (c) Na2O vs. SiO2 diagram for intraplate (I) and subduction (S) amphiboles (Coltorti et al., 2007) indicates that the Ardestan samples reflect a subduction environment. Granitoids of intraplate and subduction settings are shown for comparison: Nova Scotia granite (Papoutsa and Pe-Piper, 2014); Ludwigshoöhe (Stein and Dietl, 2001); Guangdong granites (Huang et al., 2013); and Eastern Pontides (Temizel et al., 2018). (d) Relationship between IVAl and AlT in amphiboles from the granitoids show magmatic affinities (Leake, 1971). Blue dotted line: Nova Scotia granite (intraplate setting); orange dotted line: Guangdong granite (intraplate setting); red dotted line: Ludwigshöhe granite (subduction setting); and grey dotted line: Eastern Pontides granite (subduction setting).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. (a) Composition of biotite from Ardestan plutonic rocks plotted in the annite–siderophyllite–phlogopite–eastonite quadrilateral. (b) Ardestan biotites define an I-type granite trend in the Fe2+/(Fe2++Mg2+) vs. Fe2+ classification diagram (Villaseca et al., 2017). (c) Biotite from the study area (after Foster, 1960) is classified as Mg-rich biotite. (d) Compositional variations of biotite in the AlTvs. Mg binary diagram (fields of Nachit et al., 1985) support a calc-alkaline affinity for the Ardestan samples. (e) Composition of biotite from the Ardestan plutonic rocks expressed in the Fe2+/(Fe2++Mg2+) vs. AlT diagram indicate their affinity to a continental arc setting. Sources of data: Nova Scotia granite (Papoutsa and Pe-Piper, 2014); Guangdong granites (Huang et al., 2013); Holy Moses granite (Anderson et al., 2008); East Antarctica (Li et al., 2003); Eastern Pontides (Temizel et al., 2018). Pale blue dotted line: Nova Scotia granite (intraplate setting); orange dotted line: Guangdong granite (intraplate setting); red dotted line: Holy Moses granite (intraplate setting); green dotted line: Humber granite (subduction setting); and solid blue dotted line: Eastern Pontides granite (subduction setting).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. (a) XMgvs. Al2O3 (wt.%); (b) XMgvs. FeOtotal (wt.%); (c) XMgvs. TiO2 (wt.%); (d) XMgvs. K2O + Na2O (wt.%) plots for magmatic Ardestan biotites.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Chondrite-normalised distribution REE patterns for Tertiary zircons. Fields of ‘magmatic’ and ‘hydrothermal’ zircons are from Hoskin (2005). Red field: magmatic zircon, blue field: hydrothermal zircon.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. (a) Binary images and 2D sa/la (short axis/long axis) width/length distributions for the range of values of all samples (red line) are shown along with their best fit crystal habit (grey line) as determined by CSDSlice (Morgan and Jerram, 2006). The numbers on the left corner of the CSDSlice diagram represent the aspect ratios as represented by short axis: intermediate axis: long axis of the crystal. (b) CSD diagrams of the plagioclase crystals from Ardestan granitoids. Note the non-linear trend of the diagram. Dotted lines are the calculated regression lines based on the frequency of crystal sizes. (c) CSD patterns may change in response to physical processes in the magma chamber. Mixing of two magmas with different crystal density or coarse-grained crystals can result in concave-up CSD patterns (Higgins, 2006).

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Histograms of Ti-in-zircon temperatures for three Ardestan plutonic rocks. Abbreviations in parentheses: SD: standard deviation, n: number of zircon grains analysed.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Thermometric calculations for Ardestan granitoids. (a) Whole rock Zr vs. SiO2. (b) Zircon saturation temperature (TZr.sat°C) vs. compositional parameters M and Zr of Watson and Harrison (1983) (after Siégel et al., 2018). The graphs illustrate how M and Zr are the key parameters for generating a wide range of TZr.sat°C. (c) Ti vs. Mg2+/(Mg2++Fe2+) for biotite (after Henry et al., 2005) showing temperatures of biotite formation. (d) Summary of thermometric calculations in Ardestan plutonic rocks shows emplacement at ~730 ± 50 °C.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Redox condition estimates during the crystallisation of the studied plutons. (a) Binary IVAl+VIAl (22 oxygens) vs. Fe# plot of Anderson et al. (2008) for biotite with approximate $f_{{\rm O}_{\rm 2}}$ relative to the FQM (fayalite–quartz–magnetite) buffer (PH2O = Ptotal) based on the calibration of Wones (1989). (b) Binary IVAl vs. Fe# [Fe2+/(Fe2++Mg2+)] plot (apfu) for amphibole ($f_{{\rm O}_{\rm 2}}$ fields after Anderson and Smith, 1995). (c) Log $f_{{\rm O}_{\rm 2}}$–T diagram based in biotite chemistry (after Wones and Eugster, 1965) illustrating the redox conditions of Ardestan biotites. (d) Variations in the FeO/(FeO + MgO) ratio vs. MgO in biotites from the study area; diagram after Zhou (1986).

Figure 13

Fig. 14. (a,b,c) XMgvs. log (XCl/XOH), log (XF/XOH) and log (XF/XCl) for the primary Ardestan biotites. (d) Plots of the Ardestan biotite in log (XMg/XFe) vs. log (XF/XOH) discrimination diagram of Brimhall and Crerar (1987): I-MC: I-type moderately contaminated; I-SC: I-type strongly contaminated; ISCR, I-type strongly contaminated and reduced; I-WC: I-type weakly contaminated.

Supplementary material: File

Babazadeh et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S8

Download Babazadeh et al. supplementary material(File)
File 79.4 KB