Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:59:22.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Domestic dogs and cats as sources of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in rural northwestern Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2006

R. E. GÜRTLER
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Eco-Epidemiología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
M. C. CECERE
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Eco-Epidemiología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
M. A. LAURICELLA
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Parasitología “Dr. Mario Fatala Chaben”, Paseo Colón 568, 1032 Buenos Aires, Argentina
M. V. CARDINAL
Affiliation:
Laboratorio de Eco-Epidemiología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
U. KITRON
Affiliation:
Division of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2001 South Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61802, USA
J. E. COHEN
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Populations, Rockefeller and Columbia Universities, 1230 York Ave. Box 20, New York NY 10021-6399, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The reservoir capacity of domestic cats and dogs for Trypanosoma cruzi infection and the host-feeding patterns of domestic Triatoma infestans were assessed longitudinally in 2 infested rural villages in north-western Argentina. A total of 86 dogs and 38 cats was repeatedly examined for T. cruzi infection by serology and/or xenodiagnosis. The composite prevalence of infection in dogs (60%), but not in cats, increased significantly with age and with the domiciliary density of infected T. infestans. Dogs and cats had similarly high forces of infection, prevalence of infectious hosts (41–42%), and infectiousness to bugs at a wide range of infected bug densities. The infectiousness to bugs of seropositive dogs declined significantly with increasing dog age and was highly aggregated. Individual dog infectiousness to bugs was significantly autocorrelated over time. Domestic T. infestans fed on dogs showed higher infection prevalence (49%) than those fed on cats (39%), humans (38%) or chickens (29%) among 1085 bugs examined. The basic reproduction number of T. cruzi in dogs was at least 8·2. Both cats and dogs are epidemiologically important sources of infection for bugs and householders, dogs nearly 3 times more than cats.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic parameters of dog and cat populations (Trinidad and Mercedes, September 1988–1989.)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Age-specific prevalence of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in dogs, as determined through the composite results of serodiagnosis and xenodiagnosis (A), and relationship with the density of domestic T. infestans infected with T. cruzi (B). Trinidad and Mercedes, September and December 1988, respectively. The line in (A) is the fit of the catalytic model with constant force of infection over time and age. Numbers close to data points represent the numbers of dogs examined for infection.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Age-specific prevalence of dogs seropositive for Trypanosoma cruzi and infectious to bugs (A) and percentage of xenodiagnosis bugs infected with T. cruzi after taking a single bloodmeal on seropositive dogs (infectiousness to bugs) (B). Trinidad and Mercedes, September and December 1988, respectively. Numbers close to data points in (A) represent the numbers of seropositive dogs examined by xenodiagnosis, or numbers of xenodiagnosis bugs examined for infection. Each symbol in (B) represents the percentage of bugs fed on a single dog.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Frequency distributions of individual infectiousness to bugs of all dogs seropositive for Trypanosoma cruzi at 3 survey dates, September–December 1988, March 1989 and September 1989 (A); and individual infectiousness to bugs of dogs that were ever seropositive for T. cruzi and tested on 2 or 3 occasions (B). Trinidad and Mercedes.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Age-specific prevalence of infectious hosts in the dog and cat populations, assessed by xenodiagnosis, regardless of serological data. Trinidad and Mercedes, September and December 1988, respectively. Numbers close to data points represent the numbers of hosts examined by xenodiagnosis.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Association between Trypanosoma cruzi infection and host bloodmeal source in 1085 domestic T. infestans collected in Trinidad, Mercedes and Amamá from 1988 to 1992, which were examined for T. cruzi infection. Numbers on top of bars represent bloodmeals identified on each host blood source.

Figure 6

Table 2. Relative contribution of dogs, cats and humans to domestic Triatoma infestans infected with Trypanosoma cruzi as a function of host blood index and host infectiousness