Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T17:32:08.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanism of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 cathode degradation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 July 2012

Dongjo Oh
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Danijel Gostovic
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Eric D. Wachsman*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland Energy Research Center, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: ewach@umd.edu

Abstract

Elemental enrichment behavior on the surface of La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 (LSCF) was investigated in order to understand potential degradation mechanism of solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. Surface morphological changes were examined using scanning electron microscopy after heat treatment in the temperature range of 600–900 °C. Submicron-sized precipitates were formed on grain surfaces after heat treatment. Their shapes appeared to be aligned along the surface orientations of the underlying grains. Auger electron spectroscopy and transmission electron microscopy characterization revealed that the precipitate was strontium (Sr)-oxygen (O) based. The formation of Sr–O precipitates was found to increase with increasing temperature and oxygen partial pressure. A defect chemistry model is presented based on the observed phenomena.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012
Figure 0

FIG. 1. SEM micrographs of LSCF of (a) before heat treatment and after heat treatment at (b) 600 °C, (c) 700 °C, (d) 800 °C, and (e) 900 °C for 50 h. All images are of the same scale.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Magnified images of the precipitates on LSCF surfaces after heat treatment at (a) 900 °C for 50 h, (b) 900 °C for 50 h, (c) 860 °C for 100 h, and (d) 890 °C for 100 h. (a)–(c) are polished surfaces while (d) is an unpolished surface. (a) and (b) show different location of the same sample.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Differentiated Auger electron spectra of the (a) LaMLL, (b) SrLMM, (c) CoLMM, (d) FeLMM, and (e) OKLL before (blue solid line) and after (red dotted line) heat treatment at 800 °C for 50 h.

Figure 3

TABLE I. Elemental atomic percentages (%) of pre-and post-heat-treated LSCF at 800 °C obtained from EDS and AES.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. TEM bright-field image of the cross section of precipitate (a) and EDS line scan of selected elements (b).

Figure 5

FIG. 5. SEM micrographs of LSCF surfaces after heat treatment for 50 h at (a) 800 °C/N2, (b) 800 °C/0.1% O2, (c) 890 °C/N2, and (d) 890 °C/0.1% O2.

Figure 6

FIG. 6. Schematic diagram of (a) the formation of oxygen vacancies and (b) formation of cation and anion vacancies simultaneously.