Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T02:11:42.525Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Time series analysis of nuptial flights of Afrotropical ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), and the influence of moonlight on catches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2025

C.A.M. Campbell*
Affiliation:
Cocoa Research Institute Ghana, New Tafo, Ghana Crop Protection, East Malling Research, Maidstone, ME19 6BJ, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Data from three and half years’ nightly light-trap catches of 25 Afrotropical ant species were examined by Fourier analysis. Between 8 and 72 % of the seven-day-moving-average logarithmically transformed catches were accounted for by two to four terms. All 25 species showed significant annual periodicity and all, but Dorylus fulvus and Camponotus foraminosus, six monthly. Four species had wavelengths of between two and four years, and Tapinoma melanocephalum of 289 days. Twenty-three species showed two peak catches annually, contemporaneous with the two rainy seasons, with the higher peak corresponding with the main rains for 21 of them, while D. fulvus and C. foraminosus had single annual peaks during the main rains. Catches of 14 species with lunar periodicities were lowest around full moon and highest near new moon, contrasting with Hypoponera dulcis and Plagiolepis brunni whose catches were highest at full moon, and near the first quarter, respectively. Gynes and males of eight species were sufficiently numerous for comparisons of their separate responses to lunar illuminance. Catches of males peaked ca. six and three days later than gynes for Tapinoma cf. carininotum and Tetramorium aculeatum, respectively; whereas males of Crematogaster africana, Cr. depressa, Tetramorium sericeiventre, Oecophylla longinoda, Tapinoma melanocephalum, and Technomyrmex andrei peaked from ca. one to six days earlier than their respective gynes.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Table 1. Species and abundance of Formicidae collected in a light trap at Tafo, Ghana from 10 October 1974 to 31 March 1978

Figure 1

Table 2. Anovas of fitted periodic models. Periods (days), i.e. 2π/ci in parentheses. Data are 7-d-m-a of Log10 (n + 1) where (n) is the nightly catch

Figure 2

Figure 1. Total alates in nuptial flights and fitted Fourier curves (parameters from table 3). Dorylinae: (A) Dorylus fulvus. Ponerinae: (B) Anochetus cf. katonae, (C) A. pellucidus, (D) Hypoponera dulcis, (E) Leptogenys cf. mastax, (F) Odontomachus troglodytes. Rain = months with > 10 cm total rainfall.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Total alates in nuptial flights and fitted Fourier curves (parameters from table 3). Myrmicinae: (A) Crematogaster africana, (B) C. depressa, (C) C. kneri, (D) C. striatula, (E) Pheidole speculifera, (F) Tetramorium aculeatum, (G) T. guineense, (H) T. sericeiventre. Rain = months with > 10 cm total rainfall.

Figure 4

Figure 3. Total alates in nuptial flights and fitted Fourier curves (parameters from table 3). Formicinae: (A) Camponotus maculatus, (B) C. olivieri, (C) C. vividus, (D) Oecophylla longinoda, (E) Paraparatrechina albipes. Dolichoderinae: (F) Tapinoma cf. carininotum, (G) Technomyrmex andrei. Rain = months with > 10 cm total rainfall.

Figure 5

Table 3. Parameters for fitted models: ${y_{\text{t}}} = {{\mu }} + \mathop \sum \limits_{{\text{i = 1}}}^m {\text{COS}}\left( {{c_{\text{i}}}{\text{t}}} \right)*{a_{\text{i}}} + {\text{SIN}}\left( {{c_{\text{i}}}{\text{t}}} \right)*{b_{\text{i}}} + {\varepsilon _{\text{t}}}$ where ${{\mu }} = \bar y$, n = total number of sinusoids, t = dayno, (start date is dayno 1), and εt is the t’th residual. Semi-amplitude ai = (ai2 + bi2)0.5

Figure 6

Table 4. Predicted peak flight dates (d/m) from fitted models

Figure 7

Figure 4. Average catches in relation to moon phase of A) Dorylus fulvus, B) Hypoponera dulcis, C) Odontomachus troglodytes, D) Crematogaster africana, E) C. depressa, F) C. kneri, G) C. striatula, H) Tetramorium aculeatum, I) T. sericeiventre, J) Camponotus cf. foraminosus, K) C. maculatus, K) Polyrhachis decemdentata, M) Oecophylla longinoda, N) Plagiolepis brunni, O) Tapinoma cf. carininotum, P) T. melanocephalum, Q) Technomyrmex andrei. Line is best fit from two Fourier terms. L = number of lunations, % of variance explained by the two Fourier terms, ratio of geometric catches at new vs full moon and ratio of highest and lowest geometric catches (in italics).

Figure 8

Figure 5. Deviations from mean catches in relation to moon phase of gyne (●) and male (∎), A) Crematogaster africana, B) C. depressa, C) Tetramorium aculeatum, D) T. sericeiventre, E) Oecophylla longinoda, F) Tapinoma cf. carininotum, G) T. melanocephalum, H) Technomyrmex andrei. Lines (gynes solid and males dashed) are best fits from two Fourier terms. L = number of lunations and % of variance explained for gynes and males.