Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:09:46.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design of a CPW-fed UWB printed antenna with dual notch band using mushroom structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2015

Tapan Mandal*
Affiliation:
Department of Information Technology, Government College of Engineering and Textile Technology, Serampore, Hooghly-712201, West Bengal, India
Santanu Das
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Tele-Comm. Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, Howrah-711103, West Bengal, India
*
Corresponding author: T. Mandal Email: tapanmandal20@rediffmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A coplanar waveguide-fed planar hexagonal monopole ultra-wideband antenna with dual-band rejection characteristics is proposed in this paper. The desired notch frequencies at 3.5 and 5.5 GHz are realized by incorporating mushroom structures. The input impedance and surface current distributions are used for analysis and explanation of the effects of mushroom cells. The prototype and proposed antennas are fabricated and tested. From the measured results, the proposed antenna provides an operating band of 2.81–14.32 GHz for 2 ≤ voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR), while the dual-band stop function is in the frequency bands of 3.3–3.7 GHz and 5.10–5.88 GHz. Moreover, the antenna model also exhibits constant group delay and linear phase in the pass band. The proposed antenna has appreciable gain and efficiency over the whole operating band except the notch bands.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Configuration of prototype of PRHMA.

Figure 1

Table 1. Dimensions of the proposed antenna.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Configuration of the proposed antenna.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. (a) Configuration schematic view. (b) Equivalent circuit model.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Variation of VSWR with the variation of width of mushroom patch.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Variation of VSWR with the variation of via position.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. Variation of VSWR with the variation of via radius r.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. Variation of VSWR with the variation of width of mushroom patch.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. Variation of VSWR with the variation of via radius r.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. VSWR characteristics of all configurations for comparison.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. Simulated input impedance of the proposed antenna.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. Simulated gain of the prototype and proposed antennas.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Simulated efficiency of the prototype and proposed antennas.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Surface current distributions on the proposed antenna. (a) 3.1 GHz, (b) 3.5 GHz, (c) 5.5 GHz, and (d) 7.5 GHz.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Fabricated stucture of (a) prototype (top plane), (b) proposed (top plane), and (c) proposed (bottom plane).

Figure 15

Fig. 15. VSWR versus frequency of prototype antenna.

Figure 16

Fig. 16. VSWR versus frequency of the proposed antenna.

Figure 17

Table 2. Comparison of the simulated and measured results (all frequencies in GHz).

Figure 18

Fig. 17. Simulated and measured radiation patterns.

Figure 19

Fig. 18. Measured group delay of the proposed antenna system.

Figure 20

Fig. 19. Measured phase of the proposed antenna system.