Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T17:36:45.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantum materials for thermoelectricity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2018

Johannes Gooth
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Germany; Harvard University, USA; johannes.gooth@cpfs.mpg.de
Gabi Schierning
Affiliation:
Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research Dresden (IFW Dresden), Germany; g.schierning@ifw-dresden.de
Claudia Felser
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Physics of Solids, Germany; claudia.felser@cpfs.mpg.de
Kornelius Nielsch
Affiliation:
Leibniz Institute for Solid State and Materials Research Dresden (IFW Dresden), Germany; k.nielsch@ifw-dresden.de

Abstract

Research in thermoelectric (TE) quantum structures was greatly propelled by the prediction in the early 1990s of a significant boost in TE efficiency by quantum size effects. Recently, research interest has shifted from quantum size effects in conventional semiconductors toward new types of quantum materials (e.g., topological insulators [TIs], Weyl and Dirac semimetals) characterized by their nontrivial electronic topology. Bi2Te3, Sb2Te3, and Bi2Se3, established TE materials, are also TIs exhibiting a bulk bandgap and highly conductive and robust gapless surface states. The signature of the nontrivial electronic band structure on TE transport properties can be best verified in transport experiments using nanowires and thin films. However, even in nanograined bulk, the typical peculiarities in the transport properties of TIs can be seen. Finally, the remarkable transport properties of Dirac and Weyl semimetals are discussed.

Information

Type
Materials for Energy Harvesting
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Compilation of thermoelectric (TE) transport data of the 3D topological insulator (TI) TE materials Bi2Te3, Sb2Te3, and Bi2Se3 obtained using 1D and 2D model systems (nanowires and thin films, respectively) with varying surface-to-volume (s/V) ratios. (a) ZT data of Bi2Te3 nanowires and thin films show a clear trend: The smaller s/V, the higher is ZT. Inset: Sketch of the band structure of a TI. It is constituted by a bulk valence (green) and conduction (blue) band that exhibits a parabolic dispersion, and features additional topological surface states that exhibit a linear dispersion. (b) Absolute Seebeck coefficients (S) of Bi2Se3 nanowires and normalized Seebeck coefficients of Sb2Te3 thin films show more metallic behavior with higher s/V.22–24 Note: Stot, measured total Seebeck coefficient with contributions from the bulk and the surface states; S160nm, Seebeck coefficient measured using a thin film with 160-nm film thickness.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Signatures of topological insulator properties in nanograined bulk thermoelectric BiSbTe alloy and Bi2Se3. (a) Nanograined bulk of ball-milled and hot-pressed Bi2–xSbxTe3-alloy ingot resulted in an improved ZT value due to the often discussed reduction of the lattice thermal conductivity (not shown here), but also an enhancement in the electrical conductivity σ, accompanied by a reduction of the Seebeck coefficient S, despite the small grain sizes.25 (b) Grain-size dependence of the electrical conductivity σ and the Seebeck coefficient S of Bi2Se3 nanograined bulk also demonstrates more metallic behavior with smaller grain sizes. The analysis reveals exceptionally high values of the charge-carrier mobility μ for average grain sizes below 80 nm.26

Figure 2

Figure 3. Nontrivial electronic topology in the Pb1–xSnxTe materials family. For x = 0.4, Pb0.6Sn0.4Te is a Dirac semimetal. At the composition xc, a trivial-to-nontrivial topological quantum phase transition between the topological crystalline insulator (TCI) phase and trivial phases occurs. This is also consistent with the band inversion taking place at xc, visualized by the coloring of the valence band (VB, green in the trivial phases, yellow in the TCI phase) and conduction band (CB, yellow in the trivial phases, green in the TCI phase). Reprinted with permission from Reference 28. © 2013 Elsevier. Note: SS, surface state.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Dirac and Weyl semimetals. (a) Sketch of the band structure of a Dirac and (b) of a Weyl semimetal. The cones in a Dirac semimetal are degenerated in chirality χ (direction of the charge carrier’s spin relative to its momentum). The Weyl semimetal hosts separated pairs of opposite chirality χ = –1 and χ = +1. E is the energy, and kx, ky are the momentum in the x and y directions, respectively. (c–e) show the real space scheme of the charge-carrier flow (left panels) and the associated band structure occupation (right panels). (c) Usually, the chirality is conserved. Consequently, net current flow is suppressed. However, quantum mechanical fluctuations can break the conservation law of chirality under (d) parallel magnetic B and electric fields Eel (chiral anomaly) and (e) parallel magnetic field B and temperature gradient ΔT (axial-gravitational anomaly). Under these circumstances, electrical and thermal current flow is allowed and can be tuned by the applied magnetic field.