Hostname: page-component-7b7567c8c-fvjsw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-15T12:44:46.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Granularity of Corporate Debt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2020

Jaewon Choi*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and Yonsei University jaewchoi@illinois.edu
Dirk Hackbarth
Affiliation:
Boston University Questrom School of Business, CEPR, and ECGI dhackbar@bu.edu
Josef Zechner
Affiliation:
Vienna University of Economics and Business josef.zechner@wu.ac.at
*
jaewchoi@illinois.edu (corresponding author)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

We study whether firms spread out debt-maturity dates, which we call granularity of corporate debt. In our model, firms that are unable to roll over expiring debt need to liquidate assets. If multiple small asset sales are less inefficient than a single large one, it can be optimal to diversify debt rollovers across time. Using a large sample of corporate bond issuers during the 1991–2012 period, we establish novel stylized facts and evidence consistent with our model’s predictions. There is substantial heterogeneity (i.e., firms have both concentrated and dispersed debt structures). Debt maturities are more dispersed for larger and more mature firms and for firms with better investment opportunities, higher leverage, and lower profitability. During the recent financial crisis, firms with valuable investment opportunities implemented more dispersed maturity structures. Finally, firms manage granularity actively and adjust toward target levels.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© THE AUTHOR(S), 2020. PUBLISHED BY CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS ON BEHALF OF THE MICHAEL G. FOSTER SCHOOL OF BUSINESS, UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON