Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T10:40:32.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fecundity of Nephrops norvegicus from the Irish Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2009

N. McQuaid
Affiliation:
Water Management Unit, Environment ad Heritage Service, 17 Lisburn Rd BT28 3AL
R.P. Briggs*
Affiliation:
Fisheries and Aquatic Ecosystems Branch, AFBI Headquarters, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
D. Roberts
Affiliation:
Queen's University Belfast, School of Biological Sciences, Medical Biology Centre, Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: R.P. Briggs, Fisheries and Aquatic Ecosystems Branch, AFBI Headquarters, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX email: richard.briggs@afbini.gov.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Potential fecundity, number of oocytes in the mature ovary, and realized fecundity, number of eggs extruded and attached to the pleopods of female Nephrops, caught at the start of the incubation period were estimated for females from the eastern and western Irish Sea grounds. Potential fecundity was found to differ significantly between eastern and western Irish Sea stocks, while realized fecundity did not differ between areas. Inter-year comparison of realized fecundity, and effective fecundity (the number of mature eggs on the pleopods of females at the end of the incubation period) in the western Irish Sea stocks revealed no significant variation over time. Egg loss during the transition from oocytes in the ovary to mature eggs increased with female size, ranging from 40% at 25 mm carapace length (CL) to 65% at 40 mm CL. No relationship was found between egg diameter or volume and female size.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Irish Sea showing eastern and western stations sampled (dots).

Figure 1

Table 1. Ovary maturation stages described by Briggs (1988) were adapted from those proposed by Bailey (1984).

Figure 2

Table 2. Egg development scale adapted from Figueiredo & Barraca (1963).

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Relationship between potential fecundity and carapace length for western and eastern Irish Sea stocks. Data have been log–log transformed and lines are fitted by least squares.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Relationship between realized fecundity and carapace length for eastern and western Irish Sea stocks. Coefficient of determination (r2) of 0.8474 was calculated for the relationship.

Figure 5

Table 3. The mean realized fecundities for a range of carapace lengths for realized fecundity for three separate spawning seasons. Regression equations are in the form fecundity = a CLb, where CL represents the carapace length, b is the slope and a is the intercept.

Figure 6

Fig. 4. Relationship between two methods of estimating realized fecundity in two separate spawning seasons; RF 1, trawled ovigerous females; RF2, females became ovigerous in the laboratory. Data have been log–log transformed and lines fitted by least squares. The fitted lines follow the order in which the data are listed above.

Figure 7

Fig. 5. Relationship between effective fecundity and carapace length for three separate spawning periods. Best line of fit to the data was fitted by least squares.

Figure 8

Fig. 6. Relationship between two methods of estimating effective fecundity in the 1998–1999 spawning period. Lines are fitted by least squares. Egg counts = 0.0189 CL3.170 (solid line); larval counts = 0.0101 CL3.170 (broken line).

Figure 9

Table 4. The mean fecundities predicted from the regression equations, for a range of carapace lengths for two effective fecundity techniques carried out in the 1998–1999 spawning period.

Figure 10

Fig. 7. Relationships between carapace length and potential (A), realized (B) and (C) and effective fecundity (D) for the incubation period 2000–2001 for the western Irish Sea stocks; (E) combines the 4 fecundity estimates to illustrate the similarities and differences between estimates carried out for the 2000–2001 spawning period.

Figure 11

Fig. 8. Fecundity data from Figure 7: (e) was log–log transformed to give linear relationships between number of eggs and carapace length for the different techniques.

Figure 12

Table 5. The mean fecundities predicted from the regression equations, for a range of carapace lengths for potential and realized fecundity (RF1, trawled ovigerous females; RF2, females which extruded eggs in the laboratory) for the 2000–2001 spawning season. Regression equations are in the form fecundity = a CLb, where CL represents the carapace length, b is the slope and a is the intercept.

Figure 13

Table 6. Comparison of mean predicted potential fecundity of females Nephrops norvegicus at two carapace lengths (25 mm and 35 mm) based on present and previous studies.

Figure 14

Table 7. Comparison of predicted mean realized fecundity based on egg counts from trawled ovigerous Nephrops norvegicus at two lengths based on present and previous studies. The 1999–2000 and 2000–2001 data were pooled to give a single slope and intercept.