Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T14:48:05.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of external magnetic field on lane formation in driven pair-ion plasmas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2021

Swati Baruah*
Affiliation:
Kaziranga University, Jorhat, Assam 785006, India
U. Sarma
Affiliation:
Kaziranga University, Jorhat, Assam 785006, India
R. Ganesh
Affiliation:
Institute for Plasma Research, Bhat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382428, India
*
†Email address for correspondence: baruah.s1@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Lane formation dynamics in externally driven pair-ion plasma (PIP) particles is studied in the presence of external magnetic field using Langevin dynamics (LD) simulation. The phase diagram obtained distinguishing the no-lane and lane states is systematically determined from a study of various Coulomb coupling parameter values. A peculiar lane formation-disintegration parameter space is identified; lane formation area extended to a wide range of Coulomb coupling parameter values is observed before disappearing to a mixed phase. The different phases are identified by calculating the order parameter. This and the critical parameters are calculated directly from LD simulation. The critical electric field strength value above which the lanes are formed distinctly is obtained, and it is observed that in the presence of the external magnetic field, the PIP system requires a higher value of the electric field strength to enter into the lane formation state than that in the absence of the magnetic field. We further find out the critical value of electric field frequency beyond which the system exhibits a transition back to the disordered state and this critical frequency is found as an increasing function of the electric field strength in the presence of an external magnetic field. The movement of the lanes is also observed in a direction perpendicular to that of the applied electric and magnetic field directions, which reveals the existence of the electric field drift in the system under study. We also use an oblique force field as the external driving force, both in the presence and absence of the external magnetic field. The application of this oblique force changes the orientation of the lane structures for different applied oblique angle values.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Typical simulation snapshots of the 2-D PIP system with constant external electric field ($\omega =0$), taking $\beta =1.0$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$. Panel (a) shows disordered state with electric field $E_{0} < E_{c}$ ($\phi =0.12 < 0.5$), panel (b) shows a less disordered state with electric field $E_{0}=E_{c}$ ($\phi =0.5$) and panel (c), shows ordered lane formation with $E_{0} > E_{c}$ ($\phi =0.85 > 0.5$).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Order parameter $\phi$ versus electric field strength $E_{0}$ plot for constant electric field case ($\omega =0$) both in the presence of the external magnetic field ($\beta =1.0$) and in the absence of the magnetic field ($\beta =0.0$), taking other parameters as $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Perpendicular diffusion coefficient ($D_{\textrm {xL}}$) versus $E_{0}$ plot for constant external electric field case ($\omega =0$), both in presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0$) of the external magnetic field, taking $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Critical electric field $E_{c}$ versus $\beta$ plot for constant electric field case ($\omega =0$), taking $\rho =0.5$, $1.0$, $\varGamma =2.5$.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Phase diagram for constant electric field case ($\omega =0$) in the presence of the external magnetic field; location of the phase diagram is estimated via the behaviour of the order parameter for various values of the $\varGamma$ in the presence of the different magnetic field ($\beta =0.06, 1.0$). Other parameters are $E_{0}=150$, $\rho =1.0$, $\varGamma _{\textrm {lc}}$ and $\varGamma _{\textrm {hc}}$, respectively, and indicate lower value of critical limit and higher value of critical limit of $\varGamma$. For $\beta =0.06$, $1.0$, $\varGamma _{\textrm {lc}}$ values obtained from simulation are $1.8$, $1.9$, respectively, and $\varGamma _{\textrm {hc}}$ values are $14.1$, $14.2$, respectively.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Phase diagram indicating ordered lane state and disordered no-lane state. (a) Phase diagram for constant electric field case ($\omega =0$) both in the presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0$) of the external magnetic field; location of the phase diagram is estimated via the behaviour of the order parameter for various values of the $\varGamma$. Other parameters are $E_{0}=150$, $\rho =1.0$, $\varGamma _{\textrm {lc}}$ and $\varGamma _{\textrm {hc}}$, respectively, which indicate lower value of critical limit and higher value of critical limit of $\varGamma$. For $\beta =0$, $\varGamma _{\textrm {lc}}$ and $\varGamma _{\textrm {hc}}$ are found as $1.9$, $14.1$, respectively, and for $\beta =1.0$ $\varGamma _{\textrm {lc}}=1.9$ and $\varGamma _{\textrm {hc}}=14.2$ are found. (b) Phase diagram for constant electric field case ($\omega =0$) in the presence of the external magnetic field ($\beta =0.06$) for both $\kappa =0.0001$, $4.0$; location of the phase diagram is estimated via the behaviour of the order parameter for various values of the $\varGamma$. Other parameters are $E_{0}=150$, $\rho =1.0$, simulated values of $\varGamma _{\textrm {lc}}=1.1$ and $\varGamma _{\textrm {hc}}=3.5$, respectively, for $\kappa =4.0$, and for $\kappa =0.0001$ $\varGamma _{\textrm {lc}}=1.8$ and $\varGamma _{\textrm {hc}}=14.1$ are observed. Here $\varGamma _{\textrm {lc}}$ indicates the lower value of critical limit and $\varGamma _{\textrm {hv}}$ indicates the higher value of critical limit of $\varGamma$.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Lane formation dynamics both in the presence and absence of the external magnetic field for constant electric field cases. (a) Order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}$ plot for constant field case, both in the presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0.0$) of the external magnetic field. Here, electric field is applied at $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=600$ time step. The vertical dashed lines indicate the time at which the simulation snapshots are collected and plotted, as shown in figure 7(b). The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =14.0$ and $\rho =1.0$. (b) Typical simulation snapshots taken at $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=300, 600, 2400$, showing lane formation dynamics in the constant electric field case, both in the presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0.0$) of the external magnetic field. The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =14.0$ (near phase transition location) and $\rho =1.0$.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Instantaneous positions of particles for different values of $\varGamma$ for constant electric field ($\omega =0$) case in the presence of the external magnetic field $\beta =1.0$, the other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\rho =1.0$.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Lane formation dynamics both in the presence and absence of the external magnetic field for the constant electric field case. (a) Order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}$ plot for the constant field case, both in the presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0.0$) of the external magnetic field. Here, electric field is applied at $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=600$ time step. The vertical dashed lines indicate the time at which the simulation snapshots are collected and plotted as shown in figure 9(b). The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =14.1$ and $\rho =1.0$. (b) Typical simulation snapshots taken at $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=300$, 600, 2400, showing lane formation dynamics in the constant electric field case, both in the presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0.0$) of the external magnetic field. The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =14.1$ and $\rho =1.0$.

Figure 9

Figure 10. Lane formation dynamics both in the presence and absence of the external magnetic field for constant electric field case. (a) Order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}$ plot for constant field case, both in the presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0.0$) of the external magnetic field. Here, electric field is applied at $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=600$ time step. The vertical dashed lines indicate the time at which the simulation snapshots are collected and plotted as shown in figure 10(b). The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =15.0$ and $\rho =1.0$. (b) Typical simulation snapshots taken at $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=300$, 600, 2400, showing lane formation dynamics in the constant electric field case, both in the presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0.0$) of the external magnetic field. The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =15.0$ and $\rho =1.0$.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Lane formation dynamics both in the presence and absence of the external magnetic field for the constant electric field case. (a) Order parameter $\phi$ versus $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}$ plot for the constant field case, both in the presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0.0$) of the external magnetic field. Here, electric field is applied at $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=600$ time step. The vertical dash lines indicate the time at which the simulation snapshots are collected and plotted as shown in figure 11(b) below. The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =14.2$ (phase transition location, see figure 6a) and $\rho =1.0$. (b) Typical simulation snapshots taken at $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=300$, 600, 2400, showing lane formation dynamics in the constant electric field case, both in the presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0.0$) of the external magnetic field. The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =14.2$ and $\rho =1.0$.

Figure 11

Figure 12. (a) Variation of order parameter ($\phi$) versus $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}$ for varying magnetic field strength $\beta =0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.06$ compared with that of $\beta =0$ case taking $\varGamma =2.5$. The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\rho =1.0$, $\omega =0.0$. (b) Variation of order parameter ($\phi$) versus $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}$ for varying magnetic field strength $\beta =0.001$, 0.005, 0.01, 0.06 compared with that of $\beta =0$ case taking $\varGamma =5.0$. The figures in the second column are zoomed plots from $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=600$ to $1000$. The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\rho =1.0$, $\omega =0.0$. (c) The $\beta$ dependence of the frequency of oscillation ($f$) of the order parameter ($\phi$); the dashed black line is the linear fitting and the blue solid line locates $f = \beta$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =5.0$, $E_{0}=150$, $\rho =1.0$, $\omega =0.0$.

Figure 12

Figure 13. Lane formation dynamics in the presence of the external magnetic field (with $\beta =1.0$) for oscillatory electric field case ($\omega \neq 0$). (a) Typical simulation snapshots taken at $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=300$, 910, 1634, 2242, showing spontaneous lane formation and deformation dynamics in the oscillatory electric field case ($\omega =0.001$), in the presence of external magnetic field ($\beta =1.0$). The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =0.5$. (b) Time variation of order parameter ($\phi$) plot taking the external oscillatory electric field frequency $\omega =0.001$ in the presence of external magnetic field ($\beta =1.0$). The vertical dashed lines indicate the time at which instantaneous position of the PIP particles (see, figure 13c) are recorded. The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =0.5$. (c) Time variation of order parameter ($\phi$) plot for $\omega =0.001$, 0.7, 3.5, 7.0 in the presence of external magnetic field ($\beta \neq 0$). The other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =0.5$ and $\beta =1.0$.

Figure 13

Figure 14. Non-equilibrium phase diagram for 2-D PIP system with oscillatory external electric field in the application of the external magnetic field. (a) Non-equilibrium phase diagram with oscillatory external electric field ($\omega \neq 0$) in the presence of the external magnetic field ($\beta =1.0$) showing lane zone and disordered zone. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =0.5$. (b) Non-equilibrium phase diagram with oscillatory external electric field ($\omega \neq 0$), both in the presence ($\beta =1.0$) and absence ($\beta =0$) of the external magnetic field for different $\rho$ values. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $E_{0}=2.5$.

Figure 14

Figure 15. Time variation of order parameter ($\phi$) plot for various values of the external magnetic field strength $\beta =0$, 0.005, 0.01, 0.06, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, in the presence of the oscillatory ($\omega \neq 0$) external electric field having strength $E_{0}=150$. The other parameters used are $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$.

Figure 15

Figure 16. Comparative time variation of order parameter ($\phi$) plot for two different values of Coulomb coupling parameter ($\varGamma =2.5, 5.0$), both in the absence ($\beta =0$) and presence ($\beta \neq 0$) of the external magnetic field. (a) Time variation of order parameter ($\phi$) plot for the external magnetic field strength values $\beta =0$, 0.005, 0.01, 0.06, for a PIP system in the presence of the oscillatory external electric field having frequency ($\omega =0.001$). The Coulomb coupling parameter value used here is $\varGamma =2.5$; the other parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\rho =1.0$. (b) Time variation of order parameter ($\phi$) plot for the external magnetic field strength values $\beta =0$, 0.005, 0.01, 0.06, for a PIP system in the presence of the oscillatory external electric field having frequency ($\omega =0.001$). The figures in the second column are zoomed plots from $t\omega _{\textrm {pd}}=600$ to $1000$. The plots are showing an oscillatory pattern of $\phi$, which increases with increasing $\beta$, for clarity, zoomed plots are mentioned on the right-hand side. The parameters used are $\varGamma =5.0$, $E_{0}=150$, $\rho =1.0$.

Figure 16

Figure 17. Variation of the critical value of the electric field frequency ($\omega _{c}$) with $\beta$ plot. Input parameters used are $E_{0}=150$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$, $\Delta t=0.003$.

Figure 17

Figure 18. Instantaneous position of particles in the application of constant ($\omega =0$) oblique electric field taking $\theta =30^{\circ }, 45^{\circ }, 60^{\circ }, 90^{\circ }$ ($\theta$ is the angle made by the electric field with the $x$-direction), external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ acting on the particles pointing in the $Y$-direction; other parameters used are $E_{0}=170$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$. This study is performed both in the presence ($\beta =1$) and absence ($\beta =0$) of the external magnetic field.

Figure 18

Figure 19. Instantaneous position of particles in the application of constant ($\omega =0$) oblique electric field taking $\theta =135^{\circ }, 225^{\circ }$ ($\theta$ is the angle made by the electric field with $x$-direction), external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ acting on the particles pointing in the $Y$-direction; other parameters used are $E_{0}=170$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$. This study is performed both in the presence ($\beta =1$) and absence ($\beta =0$) of the external magnetic field.

Figure 19

Figure 20. Instantaneous position of particles in the application of oscillatory ($\omega \neq 0$) oblique electric field taking $\theta =30^{\circ }, 45^{\circ }, 60^{\circ }, 90^{\circ }$ ($\theta$ is the angle made by the electric field with $x$-direction), external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ acting on the particles pointing in the $Y$-direction; other parameters used are $E_{0}=170$, $\omega =2.0$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$. This study is performed both in the presence ($\beta =1$) and absence ($\beta =0$) of the external magnetic field.

Figure 20

Figure 21. Instantaneous position of particles in the application of constant ($\omega =0$) oblique electric field taking $\theta =30^{\circ }, 45^{\circ }, 60^{\circ }, 90^{\circ }$ ($\theta$ is the angle made by the electric field with $x$-direction), external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ acting on the particles pointing in the $Y$-direction, an asymmetric system ($X=20Y$) is used here; the other parameters are $E_{0}=170$, $\omega =0.0$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$. This study is performed both in the presence ($\beta =1$) and absence ($\beta =0$) of the external magnetic field.

Figure 21

Figure 22. Instantaneous position of particles in the application of oscillatory ($\omega \neq 0$) oblique electric field taking $\theta =30^{\circ }, 45^{\circ }, 60^{\circ }, 90^{\circ }$ ($\theta$ is the angle made by the electric field with $x$-direction), external electric force $\boldsymbol {F}_{E}$ acting on the particles pointing in the $Y$-direction, an asymmetric system ($X=20Y$) is used here; the other parameters are $E_{0}=170$, $\omega =2.0$, $\varGamma =2.5$, $\rho =1.0$. This study is performed both in the presence ($\beta =1$) and absence ($\beta =0$) of the external magnetic field.