Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:36:17.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Two-sex life table and feeding dynamics of Spilosoma obliqua Walker (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) on three green gram cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2019

S.H. Mobarak
Affiliation:
Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan713104, West Bengal, India
N. Roy
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, M. U. C. Women's College, Ecology Research Unit, Burdwan713104, West Bengal, India
A. Barik*
Affiliation:
Ecology Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan713104, West Bengal, India
*
Author for correspondence: A. Barik, Email: anandamaybarik@yahoo.co.in
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of three green gram cultivars (PDM 54, PUSA BAISAKHI and SAMRAT) on the biology of Spilosoma obliqua Walker (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae) was studied using age-stage, two-sex life table. We also studied food utilization efficiency measures of larvae on green gram cultivars. The nutritional and antinutritional factors of leaves of green gram cultivars were determined. The preadult development time of S. obliqua was shortest on PDM 54 (35.54 days) and longest on SAMRAT (39.29 days). The fecundity was highest on PDM 54 (318.32) and lowest on SAMRAT (250.20). The net reproductive rate (R0) ranged from 37.53 on SAMRAT to 79.58 on PDM 54. The intrinsic rate of increase (r) was higher on PDM 54 (0.1148 day−1) and PUSA BAISAKHI (0.1018 day−1) than SAMRAT (0.0875 day−1). The finite rate of increase (λ) was lowest on SAMRAT (1.0915 day−1). Mean generation time (T) was shortest on PDM 54 (38.12 days) and longest on SAMRAT (41.42 days). Population projection revealed that the population growth was slowest on SAMRAT. The growth rate of sixth instar larvae was highest on PDM 54 and lowest on SAMRAT. The lower level of nutritional factors such as total carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, amino acids and nitrogen content, and a higher level of antinutritional factors such as total phenols, flavonols and tannins influenced higher development time and lower fecundity of S. obliqua on SAMRAT than other cultivars. These findings suggested that SAMRAT is a less suitable cultivar to S. obliqua than other cultivars, and this cultivar can be promoted for cultivation.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019
Figure 0

Table 1. Development time and adult longevity (mean ± SE) of Spilosoma obliqua on three green gram cultivars.

Figure 1

Table 2. Mean (±SE) of adult preoviposition period (APOP), total preoviposition period (TPOP), oviposition period and fecundity of Spilosoma obliqua fed on three green gram cultivars.

Figure 2

Figure 1. Age-stage-specific survival value (sxj) of Spilosoma obliqua fed on three green gram cultivars.

Figure 3

Table 3. Mean (± SE) of the intrinsic rate of increase (r), finite rate (λ), net reproductive rate (R0) and mean generation time (T) of Spilosoma obliqua fed on three green gram cultivars.

Figure 4

Figure 2. Age-specific survival rate (lx), age-stage-specific fecundity (fxj), age-specific fecundity (mx) and age-stage-specific maternity (lxmx) of Spilosoma obliqua fed on three green gram cultivars.

Figure 5

Figure 3. Age-stage-specific life expectancy (exj) of Spilosoma obliqua fed on three green gram cultivars.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Age-stage-specific reproductive value (vxj) of Spilosoma obliqua fed on three green gram cultivars.

Figure 7

Figure 5. Population projection of Spilosoma obliqua fed on three green gram cultivars.

Figure 8

Table 4. Food utilization efficiency measurement (mean ± SE) of sixth instar larvae (n = 30) of Spilosoma obliqua fed on three green gram cultivars (PDM 54, PUSA BAISAKHI and SAMRAT).

Figure 9

Table 5. Biochemical analyses (mean ± SE) of leaves of three green gram cultivars.

Supplementary material: File

Mobarak et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S5

Download Mobarak et al. supplementary material(File)
File 34.7 KB