Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T02:04:09.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Millimeter-wave antenna designs for 60 GHz applications: SoC and SiP approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2011

Christophe Calvez*
Affiliation:
Lab-STICC/MOM, Telecom Bretagne, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, CS 83818, 29238 Brest Cedex, France. Phone:  + 33 2 29 14 39.
Romain Pilard*
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics – 850, rue Jean Monnet, 38926 Crolles, France. Phone:  + 33 4 38 92 37 68.
Christian Person
Affiliation:
Lab-STICC/MOM, Telecom Bretagne, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, CS 83818, 29238 Brest Cedex, France. Phone:  + 33 2 29 14 39.
Jean-Philippe Coupez
Affiliation:
Lab-STICC/MOM, Telecom Bretagne, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, CS 83818, 29238 Brest Cedex, France. Phone:  + 33 2 29 14 39.
François Gallée
Affiliation:
Lab-STICC/MOM, Telecom Bretagne, Technopôle Brest-Iroise, CS 83818, 29238 Brest Cedex, France. Phone:  + 33 2 29 14 39.
Frédéric Gianesello
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics – 850, rue Jean Monnet, 38926 Crolles, France. Phone:  + 33 4 38 92 37 68.
Hilal Ezzeddine
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics – 16, rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 37100 Tours, France.
Daniel Gloria
Affiliation:
STMicroelectronics – 850, rue Jean Monnet, 38926 Crolles, France. Phone:  + 33 4 38 92 37 68.
*
Corresponding authors: C. Calvez and R. Pilard Emails: christophe.calvez@telecom-bretagne.eu, romain.pilard@st.com
Corresponding authors: C. Calvez and R. Pilard Emails: christophe.calvez@telecom-bretagne.eu, romain.pilard@st.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Antenna on chip (AoC) and antenna in package (AiP) solutions for millimeter-wave (mmWave) applications and their characterization are presented in this paper. Antenna integration on low resistivity (LR) and high resistivity (HR) silicon substrate are expected. And, in a packaging approach, the combination of antenna on silicon with a material, which has the effect of a “lens”, allowing increasing gain is presented. In a second part, to satisfy beamforming capabilities, a hybrid integration of the antenna on silicon and glass substrates is proposed.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. STMicroelectronics measurement setup for gain characterization.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Lab-STICC measurement setup for gain characterization.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Lab-STICC measurement setup for radiation pattern characterization.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Co-integration technique in an SoC approach.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. BEOL in (a) CMOS and (b) BiCMOS processes.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. HR and LR substrates available in silicon technologies.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Dipole antenna integrated on a LR substrate (a) model, and (b) microphotograph of the integrated antenna.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Comparison of S11 for two configurations (w/ and w/o Rexolite®) and measurement.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Simulated radiation pattern of the standalone antenna at 60 GHz.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Maximum gain and efficiency versus frequency.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Simulated radiation pattern of the antenna with Rexolite® at 60 GHz.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Measured and simulated radiation pattern of the dipole antenna on 235 µm-height substrate: (a) E-plane and (b) H-plane.

Figure 12

Table 1. Maximum realized gain comparison in z > 0 hemisphere: measurement and simulation results.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Folded-slot antenna on a HR silicon substrate.

Figure 14

Fig. 14. Folded-slot antenna matching.

Figure 15

Fig. 15. Integration with a lens.

Figure 16

Table 2. Maximum realized gain of the antenna with a lens.

Figure 17

Fig. 16. Maximum realized gain versus “lens” material permittivity with 3 mm height.

Figure 18

Fig. 17. Side view of the mmWave package with the Si-IPD™ packaged antenna.

Figure 19

Fig. 18. Side view of the Si-IPD™ packaged antenna.

Figure 20

Fig. 19. Top view of the Si-IPD™ packaged antenna (a) and photo of a patch antenna on IPD™ mounting (b).

Figure 21

Fig. 20. Simulated return loss of the Si-IPD antenna.

Figure 22

Fig. 21. Simulated radiations patterns at 60 GHz: E (blue) and H (red) planes.

Figure 23

Fig. 22. Simulated gain and antenna efficiency versus frequency in z>0 (LR Si).

Figure 24

Fig. 23. Side view of the different packaged Alumina-RO3003 antenna configurations: without (a) and with intermediate air cavity (b).

Figure 25

Fig. 24. Simulated and measured return losses of the different packaged Alumina-RO3003 antenna configurations.

Figure 26

Table 3. Bandwidth result summary.

Figure 27

Fig. 25. Measured and simulated gain versus frequency for three cavity heights: h = 75 µm (i); h = 125 µm (ii); and h = 250 µm (iii).

Figure 28

Fig. 26. Simulated and measured radiation pattern for the antenna without air cavity: E-plane (a) and H-plane (b).

Figure 29

Fig. 27. Simulated and measured radiation pattern for the antenna with an air cavity of 125 µm: Eplane (a) and H-plane (b).