Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T04:31:33.638Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Intravenous prostaglandin E1 (alprostadil) bolus in ductus arteriosus-dependent CHD: valid or absolutely contraindicated?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2023

Jose L. Colín Ortiz*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, National Institute of Paediatrics, Coyoacan, Mexico City, Mexico
Angel Cruz Hernández
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, National Institute of Paediatrics, Coyoacan, Mexico City, Mexico
Jorge A. Silva Estrada
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, National Institute of Paediatrics, Coyoacan, Mexico City, Mexico
Roberto Maldonado Alonso
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital of the Poblano Child, Puebla, Mexico
Carlos A. Corona Villalobos
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, National Institute of Paediatrics, Coyoacan, Mexico City, Mexico
Carlos González Rebeles Guerrero
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, National Institute of Paediatrics, Coyoacan, Mexico City, Mexico
Linda F. Pérez Pérez
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Hospital of the Poblano Child, Puebla, Mexico
*
Corresponding author: J. L. Colín Ortiz; Email: colin_jldgo@yahoo.com.mx
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The use of prostaglandin E1 is well documented in ductus arteriosus-dependent CHD or in neonatal pulmonary pathologies that cause severe pulmonary hypertension. The intravenous infusion is well established in loading infusion and maintenance with an onset of action of 30 minutes until 2 hours or even more. Our aim is to report three patients with pulmonary atresia that presented hypercyanotic spell due to a ductal spasm during cardiac catheterisation in whom the administration of a bolus of alprostadil reversed the spasm and increased pulmonary flow, immediately stabilising the condition of the patients allowing subsequent successful stent placement with no serious complications or sequelae after the administration of the bolus. More studies are needed to make a recommendation regarding the use of alprostadil in bolus in cases where the ductal spasm might jeopardise the life of the patient.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. a) and b): Aortic arch angiography with poor contrast pass in the pulmonary branches.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Ductal angiography showing a: critical stenosis in the pulmonary end measuring 0.15 mm (arrow) and b: 6 minutes after PGE1 bolus, pulmonary end diameter has increased to 1.2 mm (arrow).

Figure 2

Figure 3. a: Aortic arch angiography showing ductal spasm (arrow); pulmonary end measuring 0.45 mm, b: four minutes after prostaglandin bolus, angiography demonstrating an increase of lumen diameter measuring 3.5 mm (arrow).

Figure 3

Figure 4. a and b: Aortic arch angiography; absence of contrast material in pulmonary branches.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Aortic arch angiography 4 minutes after PGE1 bolus. a: Contrast material can be seen in both pulmonary branches, and b: few milliseconds after with improved visualisation of both pulmonary branches.

Figure 5

Figure 6. a: Aortic arch angiography 6 minutes after PGE1 bolus (left lateral projection); pulmonary trunk and pulmonary branches, ductus at the pulmonary end measuring 1.2 mm (arrow). b: Ductal stent adequately positioned.

Figure 6

Table 1. Case series.