Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T22:08:27.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiofrequency dissection versus ‘knot tying’ in conventional total thyroidectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 August 2014

M H Ozkul
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Haseki Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
R M Açikalin
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Haseki Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
H H Balikci*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Susehri State Hospital, Sivas, Turkey
O Bayram
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Haseki Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
AA Bayram
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Haseki Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Dr H H Balikci, Suşehri Devlet Hastanesi, Kulak Burun Bogaz Klinigi, 58600 Suşehri, Sivas, Turkey Fax: +90 346 311 48 03 E-mail: balikcient@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of radiofrequency dissection in conventional ‘open’ total thyroidectomy.

Methods:

Thirty-nine patients scheduled for conventional total thyroidectomy were included in a prospective randomised study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: a radiofrequency dissection method was used in one group, and a knot tying technique was used in the other.

Results:

Significantly fewer surgical instruments and materials were required for the radiofrequency dissection group than the knot tying group (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the two groups in mean operative time, blood loss, post-operative drainage and pain, recurrent palsy, and hypocalcaemia (p > 0.05).

Conclusion:

Radiofrequency dissection is a safe alternative to the knot tying technique, and enables a significant reduction in the number of surgical instruments required for the operation.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 (a–d) Four views of the non-stick bipolar dissection forceps (a), showing dissecting (b), coagulating (c), and cutting and grasping (d) during thyroid surgery

Figure 1

Table I Demographic characteristics, pre-operative diagnosis and pathological findings for the KT and RF groups

Figure 2

Table II Operative and post-operative characteristics of patient groups