Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T23:07:50.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A 10-W S-band class-B GaN amplifier with a dynamic gate bias circuit for linearity enhancement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Pierre Medrel*
Affiliation:
XLIM – CNRS 123, Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France. Phone: +33 0555 457 517
Audrey Martin
Affiliation:
XLIM – CNRS 123, Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France. Phone: +33 0555 457 517
Tibault Reveyrand
Affiliation:
XLIM – CNRS 123, Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France. Phone: +33 0555 457 517
Guillaume Neveux
Affiliation:
XLIM – CNRS 123, Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France. Phone: +33 0555 457 517
Denis Barataud
Affiliation:
XLIM – CNRS 123, Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France. Phone: +33 0555 457 517
Philippe Bouysse
Affiliation:
XLIM – CNRS 123, Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France. Phone: +33 0555 457 517
Jean-Michel Nébus
Affiliation:
XLIM – CNRS 123, Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France. Phone: +33 0555 457 517
Luc Lapierre
Affiliation:
Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES), 31055 Toulouse, France
Jean-François Villemazet
Affiliation:
Thales Alenia Space (TAS), 31100 Toulouse, France
*
Corresponding author: P. Medrel Email: pierre.medrel@xlim.fr
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present paper, we present a dynamic gate biasing technique applied to a 10 W, S-band GaN amplifier. The proposed methodology addresses class-B operation of power amplifiers that offers the potential for high efficiency but requires a careful attention to maintain good linearity performances at large output power back-off. This work proposes a solution to improve the linearity of class-B amplifiers driven by radio frequency-modulated signals having large peak to average power ratios. An important aspect of this work concerns the characterization of the dynamic behavior of GaN devices for gate bias trajectory optimization. For that purpose, the experimental study reported here is based on the use of a time-domain envelope setup. A specific gate bias circuit has been designed and connected to a 10 W – 2.5 GHz GaN amplifier demo board from CREE. Compared to conventional class-B operation with a fixed gate bias, a 10-dB improvement in terms of third-order intermodulation is reached. When applied to the amplification of 16-QAM signals the proposed technique demonstrates significant ACPR reduction of order of 6 dB along with error vector magnitude (EVM) improvements of five points over 8 dB output power back-off with a minor impact on power-added efficiency performances.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Static IDS/VGS characteristic at VDSQ = 28 V (left), gain and PAE versus output power for a CW tone at 2.5 GHz and a fixed gate bias at pinch-off Vp (right).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Principle of the proposed dynamic gate bias technique.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Block diagram of the experimental setup used to demonstrate the proposed dynamic gate biasing technique.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Principle of the proposed dynamic gate biasing applied at low-level envelope magnitude under a 2 Msymb/s 16-QAM signal excitation.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Gate biasing circuit topology.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Picture of the gate biasing circuit connected to the power amplifier.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Principle of the time alignment procedure.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Measured signals at planes 1 and 2: before delay compensation (top) and after delay compensation (down).

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Measured time-domain waveforms: RF input signal envelope and gate biasing signal in the case of a two-tone signal excitation (center frequency = 2.5 GHz, tone spacing = 2 MHz, and output power = 32 dBm).

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Instantaneous AM–AM characteristics versus instantaneous input envelope signal (left) and corresponding time-domain waveform of the output envelope signal (right). Ideal linearly amplified input envelope waveform is indicated by the dotted curve.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. C/I3 (left) and C/I5 (right) versus output power with and without dynamic gate bias.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. PAE of the PA with its gate bias circuit compared to fixed class-B condition (left) and DC consumption (right) versus output power.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. RF input envelope and gate biasing signal in the case of a 16-QAM modulated signal (2 MSymb/s, 33 dBm output power).

Figure 13

Fig. 14. Output signal envelopes for three different gate bias profiles: for a fixed gate bias at pinch-off Vp (envelope distortion at low level can be observed). With a non-optimal dynamic gate bias trajectory (gate bias is deliberately pulled-up too much from class-B toward class-AB). Finally, the last one corresponds to an optimal gate bias tuning.

Figure 14

Fig. 15. Constellation diagrams and instantaneous envelope gain measurements. Fixed gate bias at pinch-off Vp (left), non-optimal gate bias profile with too much gain at low level (middle) and optimal tuning of gate bias profile for a maximally flat gain (right).

Figure 15

Fig. 16. PAE (left) and EVM (right) versus output power when the optimal dynamic gate biasing signal is applied and when fixed gate bias conditions from class-B up to class-AB are applied.

Figure 16

Fig. 17. Output spectrum measurement showing a 6-dB ACPR improvement. ACPR reduction can be clearly seen between fixed class-B operation and with dynamic gate biasing conditions.