Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-c52kr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T03:14:40.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A compact dual-polarized co-radiator MIMO antenna for UWB applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2021

Harleen Kaur
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala-147 004, Punjab, India
Hari Shankar Singh*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala-147 004, Punjab, India TIET-VT Center of Excellence for Emerging Materials (CEEMS), TIET, Patiala-147 004, Punjab, India
Rahul Upadhyay
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala-147 004, Punjab, India
*
Author for correspondence: Hari Shankar Singh, E-mail: harishankar1990@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this research study, a compact dual-polarized co-radiator ultra-wideband (UWB) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antenna with improved impedance bandwidth and isolation is proposed for wireless applications. The designed co-radiator has an overall area of 0.3λo × 0.3λo mm2 (where, λo is free space wavelength corresponding to the lower cut-off frequency, i.e., 3.1 GHz). The proposed resonator comprises of a hybrid geometry which is created with the combinations of a circular-shaped patch, a square, and two rectangular stubs. It is centrally aligned between two 50 Ω micro-strip feed lines that are positioned orthogonal to each other. Further, the modified ground plane is attached with the end-loaded line which provides broadband isolation over entire UWB frequency band. The simulated results of the proposed antenna exhibit wideband characteristics with impedance bandwidth of 3.1–16.9 GHz with minimum isolation of −15 dB. Moreover, all the radiation performance parameters are analyzed and discussed. Some important diversity parameters such as envelope correlation coefficient, mean effective gain, effective diversity gain, and channel capacity loss have also been evaluated. Furthermore, all the measured results of proposed antenna agree well with the simulated results which make the proposed antenna a suitable candidate for UWB-MIMO wireless applications.

Information

Type
Antenna Design, Modeling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of proposed antenna with other antennas

Figure 1

Fig. 1. (a) Top layout of proposed UWB-MIMO antenna; (b) bottom layout of proposed UWB-MIMO antenna.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. (a) Design evolution of proposed co-radiator UWB-MIMO antenna; (b) reflection coefficient comparison for the design steps; (c) mutual coupling comparison for the design steps.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Surface current distributions at 3.75 GHz for each design configuration when one of the port is excited.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. (a) Design steps of the proposed antenna ground plane; (b) effect of ground variation on reflection coefficients; (c) effect of ground variation on mutual coupling.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Simulated surface current distributions at 4 GHz when both ports are excited.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. (a) Simulated far-field distributions of electric field when port-1 and port-2 are excited at 4 GHz; (b) simulated far-field distributions of electric field when port-1 and port-2 are excited at 8 GHz; (c) simulated far-field distributions of electric field when port-1 and port-2 are excited at 12 GHz.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. (a) Effect of radius of patch (Rp) on reflection coefficients; (b) effect of width of ground rectangle (g3) on reflection coefficients; (c) effect of width of micro-strip line (w) on reflection coefficients; (d) effect of width of feed line (g) on reflection coefficients; (e) effect of length of the micro-strip feed (Lf) on reflection coefficients.

Figure 8

Fig. 8. (a) Fabricated prototypes along with measurement set-up; (b) comparison of simulated and measured S-parameters of the proposed antenna.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. (a) 3D far-field radiation patterns at 3.75, 10.6 and 12.55 GHz; (b) 2D simulated and measured patterns at 3.75, 10.6 and 12.55 GHz; (c) plots of peak realized gain and total antenna efficiency versus frequency.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. (a) EDG of the proposed antenna; (b) comparison of simulated and measured ECC; (c) comparison of simulated and measured CCL of the proposed antenna.

Figure 11

Table 2. MEGs of the proposed UWB MIMO antenna

Figure 12

Fig. 11. Four-element UWB-MIMO antennas with extended ground, a USB port and housing.

Figure 13

Fig. 12. (a) Comparison of reflection coefficients in actual environment (attached with USB and housing) with free space; (b) comparison of mutual coupling between antenna elements in actual environment (attached with USB and housing) with free space.