Hostname: page-component-6898cfcb55-kwdml Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-11T06:47:29.128Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modelling fabric development along the GRIP ice core, central Greenland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

O. Castelnau
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Environnement, 38402 Saint-Martin-d’Hères Cedex, France
Th. Thorsteinsson
Affiliation:
Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Postfach 120261, D-27515 Bremerhaven, Germany
J. Kipfstuhl
Affiliation:
Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Postfach 120261, D-27515 Bremerhaven, Germany
P. Duval
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Environnement, 38402 Saint-Martin-d’Hères Cedex, France
G. R. Canova
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Génie Physique et Mécanique des Matériaux, 38402 Saint-Martin-d’Hères Cedex, France
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The preferred c-axes orientation (fabric) observed in cold polar ice is induced by intracrystalline slip only when the grain-boundary migration rate is low enough (i.e. corresponding to grain growth or rotation recrystallization regimes). Fabrics reflect the entire thermomechanical history of the ice and strongly influence its mechanical behaviour. Large viscoplastic anisotropy is always associated with pronounced fabrics. We use a viscoplastic self-consistent (VPSC) polycrystal deformation model to calculate fabric development. In this model, stress- and strain-rate fields are not uniform within the polycrystal and both equilibrium and compatibility conditions are fulfilled. We compare fabrics measured on thin sections along the GRIP ice core (central Greenland) with those calculated down to a depth of 2800 m. Behaviours predicted by uniform stress and uniform strain bounds are presented for comparison. Predictions of the VPSC model are in close agreement with measurements within the upper 650 m, which corresponds to the entire grain-growth zone. Deeper clown, the simulated fabric strength appears to be too high. A simple calculation shows that this discrepancy may be fully attributed to the effects of rotation recrystallization.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1996
Figure 0

Fig. 1.Calculation scheme of the VPSC model: each grain is considered as an inclusion in a homogeneous equivalent medium, whose mechanical behaviour is that of the polycrystal.

Figure 1

Fig. 2.(a) Schematic grain-size profiles from the GRIP core. The full curve shows average horizontal crystal diameters, the dashed curve vertical diameters (Thorsteinsson and others, 1995b). (b) Selected c-axis fabric diagrams from five different depths in the GRIP core: 249.2, 991.1, 1625.8, 2064.2 and 2696.1 m. The centre of the diagrams indicates the in-situ vertical direction (Thorsteinsson and others, 1995b). (c) Ratio a/a0 of the present thickness if the annual layer in the ice sheet to the original thickness of the same layer during its deposition at the surface (Dahl–Jensen and others, 1993; personal communication from S. J. Johnsen). (d) Temperature profile in the GRIP borehole (Johnsen and others, 1995). (e) Estimated time-scale (Dansgaard and others, 1993).

Figure 2

Fig. 3.Comparison of (a) the fabric pattern of the GRIP ice for a depth of 991.1 m (Thorsteinsson and others, 1995b), with fabrics simulated in uniaxial compression with (b) static, (c) VPSC and (d) Taylor model for a vertical strain of 0.387, corresponding to a depth of 990 m. The centre of the diagrams indicates the in-situ vertical direction (a) and the direction of compression (b–d).

Figure 3

Fig. 4.Evolution of the strength of orientation with depth. Results of Static, VPSC and Taylor models, compared to the measured GRIP data (triangles). The dash-dot-dot curve is a polynomial fit of these data. GRIP data are from Thorsteinsson and others (1995b).

Figure 4

Fig. 5.Progressive misorientation of a sub-boundary and associated deformation.