Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T12:01:51.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of three-dimensional silver-doped borate bioactive glass scaffolds for bone repair: Biodegradability, biocompatibility, and antibacterial activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2015

Hui Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Bioengineering and Information Technology Materials, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Shichang Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China
Xu Cui
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Yangyi Pan
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Wenhai Huang
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Song Ye
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
Shihua Luo
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated Ruijing Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China
Mohamed N. Rahaman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri 65409, USA
Changqing Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200233, China
Deping Wang*
Affiliation:
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: wdpshk@tongji.edu.cn

Abstract

The development of synthetic scaffolds with a desirable combination of properties, such as bioactivity, the ability to locally deliver antibacterial agents and high osteogenic capacity, is a challenging but promising approach in bone tissue engineering. In this study, scaffolds of a borosilicate bioactive glass (composition: 6Na2O, 8K2O, 8MgO, 22CaO, 36B2O3, 18SiO2, 2P2O5; mol%) with controllable antibacterial activity were developed by doping the parent glass with varying amounts of Ag2O (0.05, 0.5, and 1.0 wt%). The addition of the Ag2O lowered the compressive strength and degradation of the bioactive glass scaffolds but it did not affect the formation of hydroxyapatite on the surface of the glass as determined by energy dispersive x-ray analysis, x-ray diffraction, and Fourier transform infrared analysis. The Ag2O-doped scaffolds showed a sustained release of Ag ions over more than 8 weeks in simulated body fluid and resistance against colonization by the bacterial strains Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. In vitro cell culture showed better adhesion, proliferation, and alkaline phosphatase activity of murine osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells on the Ag2O-doped bioactive glass scaffolds than on the undoped scaffolds. The results indicate that these Ag-doped borosilicate bioactive glass scaffolds may have potential in repairing bone coupled with providing a lower risk of bacterial infection.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. (a) Optical image of as-fabricated BG-1.0Ag scaffold and (b) compressive strengths of BG and BG-Ag scaffolds. Mean ± SD; n = 5. Difference when compared to BG (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

Figure 1

FIG. 2. FESEM images for the (a1, a2) BG, (b1, b2) BG-0.05Ag, (c1, c2) BG-0.5Ag, and (d1, d2) BG-1.0Ag scaffold before soaking in SBF; FESEM images for the (a3) BG, (b3) BG-0.05Ag, (c3) BG-0.5Ag, and (d3) BG-1.0Ag scaffolds after soaking in SBF for 90 days; EDS analysis for the (a4) BG, (b4) BG-0.05Ag, (c4) BG-0.5Ag, and (d4) BG-1.0Ag.

Figure 2

FIG. 3. (a) XPS spectrum and (b) Ag(3d) line spectrum of BG-1.0Ag scaffold after immersion for 90 days in SBF.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. XRD patterns for (a) BG-1.0Ag after immersion in SBF for 0, 14, 90 days; (b) BG and BG-Ag scaffolds after immersion for 14 days. For comparison, the pattern of a reference HA (JCPDS 72-1243) is shown.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. FTIR spectra for (a) BG-1.0Ag scaffold after immersion in for 0, 14, 90 days; (b) BG and BG-Ag scaffolds after immersion in SBF for 14 days.

Figure 5

FIG. 6. (a) Weight loss of the four group of scaffolds and (b) the pH of the medium as a function of immersion time of the scaffolds in SBF (starting pH = 7.4).

Figure 6

FIG. 7. (a) Cumulative amount of Ag ions released from Ag-doped bioactive glass scaffolds as a function of immersion time in SBF; (b) amount of Ag released from the scaffolds at specific times into SBF.

Figure 7

FIG. 8. FESEM micrographs of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured for 48 h on the surface of the four groups of scaffolds: (a) BG, (b) BG-0.05Ag, (c) BG-0.5Ag, (d) BG-1.0Ag.

Figure 8

FIG. 9. Quantitative measurement of (a) proliferation and (b) ALP activity of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured in extracts of the ionic dissolution product of four groups of scaffolds for the times shown. Control: under identical culture conditions without the ionic dissolution products of the glass. Mean ± SD; n = 3, P > 0.05 as control.

Figure 9

FIG. 10. CLSM images of MC3T3-E1 cells cultured for 24 h in extracts of the ionic dissolution product of four groups of scaffolds (BG, BG-0.05Ag, Bg-0.5Ag, BG-1.0Ag) showing nucleus stained with DAPI (blue) and F-actin stained with FITC-phalloidin (green). (White arrow: prominent filopodia and unidirectional lamellipodia extensions.)

Figure 10

FIG. 11. Growth inhibition zones of (a) E. coli and (b) S. aureus around the four groups of scaffolds after incubation for 24 h on LB agar plates (1: BG; 2: BG-0.05Ag; 3: BG-0.5Ag; 4: BG-1.0Ag); (c) percent bacterial inhibition of E. coli and S. aureus by the four groups of scaffolds after incubation for 24 h; (d) percent bacterial inhibition of E. coli and S. aureus by the four groups of scaffolds after the scaffolds were immersed for 3 days in SBF and then incubated for 24 h. Mean ± SD; n = 3. Difference between groups (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

Figure 11

FIG. 12. FESEM images of (a–d) E. coli and (e–f) S. aureus seeded on the surface of the four groups of scaffolds and incubated for 24 h, (a, e) BG, (b, f) BG-0.05Ag, (c, g) BG-0.5Ag, (d, h) BG-1.0Ag. The black arrows indicate the round, smooth or cells going through binary fission while the white arrows indicate the corrugated, damaged, and lysed cells.

Supplementary material: Image

Wang supplementary material S1

Supplementary Figure

Download Wang supplementary material S1(Image)
Image 120.6 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Wang supplementary material S2

Supplementary Figure

Download Wang supplementary material S2(Image)
Image 134.7 KB