Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T04:21:27.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-time PCR versus traditional and Nano-based ELISA in early detection of murine trichinellosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2023

S. M. Mohammad
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
L. A. Hegazy
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
R. S. Abdel Hady
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
M. A. Salama
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
S. K. Hammad*
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
S. M. Ibrahim
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt
*
Corresponding author: S. K. Hammad; Email: Samar.kamel.2010@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Trichinellosis is a serious foodborne zoonosis. It poses a serious risk to public health worldwide. Early serological diagnosis of trichinellosis is influenced by an immunological ‘silent’ phase following infection. This highlights the necessity for developing sensitive diagnostic approaches to be employed when antibodies cannot be detected. In this work, the validity of traditional ELISA, Nano-ELISA and real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were evaluated in early diagnosis of Trichinella spiralis. Swiss albino mice were orally infected with 100 and 300 muscle larvae/mouse. Mice were sacrificed 4, 6, 8, 10, 15, and 28 days post-infection (dpi). Blood samples were tested for circulating antigen by traditional ELISA and Nano-ELISA using anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG conjugated with AgNPs and for Rep gene by SYBR green real-time PCR. Rep gene detection by SYBR green real-time PCR could detect T. spiralis with 100% sensitivity in the mild infection group at 8 dpi, while in the severe infection group it reached 100% sensitivity at 4 dpi. Nano-ELISA could detect T. spiralis circulating antigen from 4 dpi in both mild and severe infection and reached 100% sensitivity at 8 dpi and 6 dpi in mild and severe infection, respectively. However, traditional ELISA could detect T. spiralis circulating antigen from 6 dpi and reached maximum sensitivity at 15 dpi in the mild infection group, while in the severe infection group detection began at 4 dpi and reached 100% sensitivity at 8 dpi. Nano-ELISA and real time PCR, using Rep gene, are useful tools for the detection of early T. spiralis infection even in its mild infection state.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) SEM silver nanoparticles 50 nm size; (b) Size distribution analysis.

Figure 1

Table 1. Comparison between mean and SD of intestinal adult trichinellosis among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infection groups

Figure 2

Table 2. Sensitivity of the traditional ELISA test among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infection groups

Figure 3

Table 3. Performance of Nano-based ELISA test among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infection groups

Figure 4

Table 4. Performance of Rep gene PCR test among different subgroups of both the mild and severe infected group

Figure 5

Table 5. Performance of quantitative PCR in diagnosis of severity in all studied groups

Figure 6

Figure 2. (a) SYBR Green fluorescence chart for DNA samples of mice, resulting from quantitative PCR and Rep gene expression; (b) Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showing performance of quantitative PCR in diagnosis of severe infection. The best cutoff of quantitative PCR in prediction of severe infection was ≥ 2.5841 with area under curve of 0.9, sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 81.5%, positive predictive value of 78.3%, negative predictive value of 83%, and overall accuracy of 80.8% (P < 0.001).

Figure 7

Table 6. Validity of ELISA and Nano-ELISA in diagnosis of parasitic infection after using PCR as a gold standard test