Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-05T21:41:12.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fluid regulation strategies and valve innovations in soft robots: a review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2025

Xinzhou Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Kaiwen Zheng
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Jiabiao Li
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Haoteng Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Rencheng Zheng
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
Jianbin Liu*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Mechanism Theory and Equipment Design of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China
*
Corresponding author: Jianbin Liu; Email: jianbin_liu@tju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Soft robots have emerged as a transformative technology with widespread applications across diverse fields. Among various actuation mechanisms, fluid-based actuation remains predominant in soft robotics, where precise fluid regulation is fundamental to system performance. This review aims to provide a comprehensive reference for researchers interested in fluid regulation strategies in soft robots by outlining the current state of research in this field and discussing innovations in valve designs to inspire future advancements. The fluid regulation strategies discussed in this review are systematically categorized into three main approaches: valve-based, smart fluid-based, and pressure source-based strategies, with each type systematically classified and discussed in detail. Building upon this analysis, a Task-to-Fluidic Regulation System mapping framework is proposed, integrating the V-model principles from systems engineering to provide a structured, requirements-driven methodology that links task objectives to concrete regulation system configurations through sequential design and multi-level verification. Finally, the latest advancements in fluid regulation methods in soft robotics are summarized, along with emerging trends and directions for future development.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Classification of fluid regulation strategies in soft robots.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Schematic illustration of soft valve mechanisms: (a) Flexible channel deformation via kinking, (b) Flexible channel deformation via compression, (c) Physically obstructed channel utilizing elastic deformation, (d) Physically obstructed channel utilizing displacement.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Soft valves for soft robotics applications. (a) A soft, bistable valve for autonomous control of soft actuators. Reproduced with permission. Ref. [38] Copyright 2018, the American association for the advancement of science. (b) A soft, self-sensing tensile valve for soft robots. Reproduced under the terms of the creative commons CC-BY license. Ref. [41] Copyright 2023, Springer Nature. (c) A soft valve for reprogrammable sequential actuation in soft robots. Reproduced with permission. Ref. [51] Copyright 2022, Elsevier. (d) A self-excited vibration valve that induces traveling waves in pneumatic soft mobile robots. Reproduced under the terms of the creative commons CC-BY license. Ref. [47] Copyright 2020, IEEE.

Figure 3

Table I. Overview of soft valves based on flexible channel deformation.

Figure 4

Table II. Overview of soft valves based on physically obstructed channels.

Figure 5

Table III. Overview of rigid valves in soft robots.

Figure 6

Figure 4. Microfluidic valves for soft robotics applications. (a) Microfluidic control systems for robot “Octobot”. Reproduced with permission. Ref. [78] Copyright 2016, Springer Nature. (b) Microfluidic valves for demultiplexer. Reproduced with permission. Ref. [79] Copyright 2020, Royal Society of Chemistry. (c) 3D-printed multi-material microfluid valve. Reproduced under the terms of the CC-BY license. Ref. [81] Copyright 2016, Public Library of Science. (d) Microfluidic valves for the 12-layer soft ``spider” apparatus. Reproduced with permission. Ref. [64] Copyright 2018, Wiley.

Figure 7

Table IV. Performance indicators of different types of valves.

Figure 8

Figure 5. Schematic diagram of ERF and MRF.

Figure 9

Table V. Comparison of control methods based on smart fluids.

Figure 10

Figure 6. Schematic diagram of traditional pressure source (a) A traditional fluid-based pressure source in a soft robotic fish. Reproduced with permission. Ref. [113] copyright 2016, Springer Nature. (b) A traditional fluid-based pressure source flexible gripper for grasping underwater organisms. Reproduced with permission. Ref. [116] copyright 2019, The American Association for the Advancement of Science. (c) A traditional gas-based pressure source-driven flexible joint for soft robots. Reproduced with permission. Ref. [123] copyright 2018, Wiley. (d) A traditional gas-based pressure source-driven linear flexible joint. Reproduced with permission. Ref. [124] copyright 2016, Wiley.

Figure 11

Figure 7. Pressure sources driven by electric and magnetic fields (a) Schematic diagram of pressure sources based on DE (b) Schematic diagram of pressure source based on electrostatic reaction.

Figure 12

Figure 8. Schematic diagram of the reaction between H2O2 solution and catalyst.

Figure 13

Figure 9. Soft robot driven by monopropellant decomposition chemical reaction (a) A schematic of the octobot system. Ref. [78] (b) Schematic diagram of hydrogen peroxide decomposition reaction driving, with hydrogen peroxide in contact with the catalyst to release oxygen (Red means that the film is attached to the surface of the catalyst, thus stopping the reaction to form a feedback loop). Ref. [150].

Figure 14

Figure 10. Soft robot driven by combustion chemical reaction (a) The gas produced by the combustion reaction causes the robot to produce a driving diagram. (b) Schematic diagram of combustion reaction drive (reaction of gaseous butane with oxygen) [151] (c) Schematic diagram of combustion reaction drive (reaction of liquid butane with oxygen, where oxygen is produced by hydrogen peroxide through a manganese catalyst) [152] (d) Schematic diagram of combustion reaction drive (reaction of liquid butane with air) [153] (e) Schematic diagram of combustion reaction drive (reaction of gas–liquid propane and butane mixture with nitrous oxide) [154] (f) Schematic diagram of combustion reaction drive (reaction of methane with oxygen) [155].

Figure 15

Table VI. Advantages and disadvantages of various pressure sources.

Figure 16

Figure 11. Soft robot driven by hypergolic reactions chemical reaction (a) Schematic diagram of the reaction of sodium bicarbonate and citric acid to produce carbon dioxide [156] (b) Schematic diagram of hydrogen and oxygen produced by electrolysis of water [157] (c) Schematic diagram of energy generated by zinc iodide flow battery [158].

Figure 17

Figure 12. V-model-based task-to-fluidic regulation system (TFRS) mapping framework for designing soft robotic fluidic regulation systems.