Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-2dmjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T10:34:57.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Late Jurassic – earliest Cretaceous prolonged shelf dysoxic–anoxic event and its possible causes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 August 2020

MA Rogov*
Affiliation:
Geological Institute of RAS, Pyzhevski lane 7/1, Moscow 119017, Russia Saint-Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia
EV Shchepetova
Affiliation:
Geological Institute of RAS, Pyzhevski lane 7/1, Moscow 119017, Russia
VA Zakharov
Affiliation:
Geological Institute of RAS, Pyzhevski lane 7/1, Moscow 119017, Russia
*
Author for correspondence: MA Rogov, Email: russianjurassic@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Late Jurassic – earliest Cretaceous time interval was characterized by a widespread distribution of dysoxiс–anoxiс environments in temperate- and high-latitude epicontinental seas, which could be defined as a shelf dysoxic–anoxic event (SDAE). In contrast to black shales related to oceanic anoxic events, deposits generated by the SDAE were especially common in shelf sites in the Northern Hemisphere. The onset and termination of the SDAE was strongly diachronous across different regions. The SDAE was not associated with significant disturbances of the carbon cycle. Deposition of organic-carbon-rich sediment and the existence of dysoxic–anoxic conditions during the SDAE lasted up to c. 20 Ma, but this event did not cause any remarkable biotic extinction. Temperate- and high-latitude black shale occurrences across the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary have been reviewed. Two patterns of black shale deposition during the SDAE are recognized: (1) Subboreal type, with numerous thin black shale beds, bounded by sediments with very low total organic carbon (TOC) values; and (2) Boreal type, distinguished by predominantly thick black shale successions showing high TOC values and prolonged anoxic–dysoxic conditions. These types appear to be unrelated to differences in accommodation space, and can be clearly recognized irrespective of the thickness of shale-bearing units. Black shales in high-latitude areas in the Southern Hemisphere strongly resemble Boreal types of black shale by their mode of occurrence. The causes of this SDAE are linked to long-term warming and changes in oceanic circulation. Additionally, the long-term disturbance of planktonic communities may have triggered overall increased productivity in anoxia-prone environments.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Correlation of the regional ammonite biostratigraphic scales for the Oxfordian–Berriasian period. Boreal zonal successions are provided for 3 regions: (1) the Russian Platform; (2) England and (3) Northern Siberia. Correlation of the Volgian part of the succession is after Rogov & Zakharov (2009), with minor corrections.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Black shale distribution across the J/K boundary in the Boreal areas of the Northern Hemisphere. N – North; Norw – Norway; Norweg – Norwegian; Greenl – Greenland; North – Northern; Boulonn – Boulonnais; Form – Formation; Novik – Novikovka; Podm – Podmoskovie; Trazovs – Trazovskaya; Promzin – Promzinskaya; for data source see text.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Typical lithological logs, TOC values, thickness and stratigraphic distribution of black shales belonging to SDAE (western Europe). (a) Swanworth Quarry 1 borehole, England (Morgans-Bell et al.2001); (b) Blokelv-1 borehole, Jameson Land, East Greenland (Bojesen-Koefoed et al.2018; age after Alsen & Piasecki, 2018); and (c) DH2 and DH5R boreholes, Spitsbergen (Koevoets et al.2016, 2019; age after Rogov, unpubl. data). Abbreviations: ba. – bayi; Bath. – Bathonian; Call. – Callovian; cymod. – cymodoce; dc. – decipiens; eleg. – elegans; exot – exoticus; I – iatriensis; Km., Kimmer. – Kimmeridgian; L., Low. – Lower; lamb. – lambecki; L.Volg. – Lower Volgian; max. – maximus; Mid. – Middle; mt. – mutabilis; okens. – okensis; Oxford. – Oxfordian; ru. – Rugosa; U. – Upper; U. V. – Upper Volgian; Volg. – Volgian; whea. – wheatleyensis.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (a–d) Hydrogen index (HI) versus pyrolysis Tmax diagrams, showing kerogen type and thermal maturity (after Delvaux et al.1990; Tyson, 1995) of Subboreal and Boreal black shales of Europe. Dashed curve distinguishes kerogen of Type II (marine) and mixed Type II–III (marine and terrestrial). Dotted vertical line (Tmax = 430°C) subdivides immature and mature kerogen. R0, vitrinite reflectance.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Typical lithological logs, TOC values, thickness and stratigraphic distribution of black shales belonging to SDAE (eastern Europe and Siberia). (a) Gorodischi, Memei and Kashpir, composite, Volga area, Central Russia (Hantzpergue et al.1998; Rogov, 2010, 2013; Gavrilov et al.2014); (b) borehole 559, Samara region, Central Russia (Kulyova et al.2004); (c) Cape Urdyuk-Khaya, Nordvik peninsula, Northern Siberia (Kashirtsev et al.2018); and (d) borehole no. 6, Western Siberia (Panchenko et al.2015, 2016). autissiod. – autissiodorensis; Kimm. – Kimmeridgian; L., Low. – Lower; LV, L.V. – Lower Volgian; Mid. – Middle; mt. – mutabilis; Oxford. – Oxfordian; U. – Upper; UV – Upper Volgian. For legend see Figure 3.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Typical fossils encountered in Upper Jurassic black shales in Russia. (a, c) Megaonychites, coleoid hooks from the Volgian Stage of Western Siberia; (b, e) Ammonites associated with Buchia bivalves and oyster; (e) in the ammonite umbilical region, Volgian Stage of Western Siberia; (d) Inoceramus from the Bazhenovo Formation of Western Siberia; (f) Upper Oxfordian black shales showing typical accumulation of juvenile and mature ammonite shells, occasional bivalves and shell debris; Mikhalenino section, Kostroma region, Russia; (g) Fossilized soft tissue remains of the fin and part of the body of coleoid mollusc (age and locality as for (f)); (h) Numerous complete and disarticulated shells of planktonic bivalve Aulacomyella, Upper Kimmeridgian, Memei section, Middle Volga area, Russia; (i) Coleoid Acanthoteuthis (in the central part of the figure), piece of big-sized inoceramid bivalve (in the top), shell debris and limped gastropod (below coleoid), Middle Volgian of well 559, Samara region, Russia. Scale bar for (f, g) 5 cm; scale bar for other specimens is 1 cm (see lower right corner of the figure).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Black shales of the Subboreal type. (a) Middle Volgian black shales in the Gorodischi section (middle Volga area, Russia). Thickness of black shale member is c. 6 m (photograph by MA Rogov). (b) Ryazanian black shales of the Subboreal type embedded between two sandy units in the Kashpir section (middle Volga area, Russia). Diameter of a coin c. 2 cm (photograph by SV Maleonkina).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Black shales of the Boreal type. (a) Kimmeridgian black shales at Myklegardfjellet, Spitsbergen (photograph by DS Zykov). (b) Volgian–Ryazanian boundary beds at Nordvik, northern Siberia (photograph by M Mazuch).

Figure 8

Fig. 9. (a–d) Hydrogen index (HI) versus pyrolysis Tmax diagram, showing kerogen type and thermal maturity (after Delvaux et al.1990; Tyson, 1995) of Subboreal and Boreal black shales of the Barents Sea region and Siberia. Dashed curve distinguishes kerogen of Type II (marine) and mixed Type II–III (marine and terrestrial). Dotted vertical line (Tmax = 430°C) subdivides immature and mature kerogen; R0, vitrinite reflectance.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Oxfordian and Kimmeridgian palaeogeography (after Rees et al.2000, with minor changes) and worldwide distribution of black shales.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Volgian and Ryazanian palaeogeography and worldwide black shale distribution.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Climate indicators and black shale distribution in Western and north of Eastern Siberia. Blue bars showing amount of glendonite-bearing sites (Rogov et al.2019, with minor changes), while orange and red lines showing Classopollis pollen abundance (based on Vakhrameyev, 1982, with some additions from Ilyina, 1985; Nikitenko et al.2015).

Supplementary material: PDF

Rogov et al. supplementary material

Rogov et al. supplementary material

Download Rogov et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 158.1 KB