Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-j7cmm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T20:30:16.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Engineering clay minerals to manage the functions of soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2022

Menghan Yu
Affiliation:
Engineering Research Center of Nano-Geomaterials of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Faculty of Materials Science and Chemistry, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Key Laboratory of Functional Geomaterials in China Nonmetallic Minerals Industry, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Sarwar Muhammad Tariq
Affiliation:
Engineering Research Center of Nano-Geomaterials of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Faculty of Materials Science and Chemistry, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Key Laboratory of Functional Geomaterials in China Nonmetallic Minerals Industry, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
Huaming Yang*
Affiliation:
Engineering Research Center of Nano-Geomaterials of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Faculty of Materials Science and Chemistry, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Key Laboratory of Functional Geomaterials in China Nonmetallic Minerals Industry, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China Hunan Key Laboratory of Mineral Materials and Application, School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clay minerals are essential components of soil systems and understanding their role in soil structure and function is critical for soil environmental quality management and sustainable agricultural development. An in-depth study of clay minerals and the development of related materials is essential for a complete understanding and effective management of soil systems. This review is a detailed compilation of relevant studies over the past decade in this area, focusing on an overview of clay minerals and their modified materials and their regulation of soil structure and function. We focus on the direct influence of clay minerals on the physical, chemical and biological properties of soils, such as soil structure, soil fertility, plant growth, soil microbial activity and soil carbon sequestration. Finally, we concluded by summarizing the existing issues with clay mineral materials in soil improvement and by outlining potential future development trends and strategies.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Role of clay minerals in soil physical properties and nutrient supply and availability (reprinted with permission from Delgado & Gómez, 2016).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. (a) The adsorption of P onto kaolinite at four different environmental conditions including pH and ionic strength (IS) (reprinted with permission from Hao et al., 2021). (b) Adsorption isotherms of phosphate by kaolinite, goethite, goethite–kaolinite mixture (GKM) and goethite–kaolinite association (GKA) as a function of KCl concentration (reprinted with permission from Wei et al., 2014, Elsevier B.V.). (c) Nutrient release profile of a kaolinite–KH2PO4 sample system with varying amounts of kaolinite (wt.%; reprinted with permission from Al-Rawajfeh et al., 2019, Elsevier B.V.). (d) Nutrient release profile of a kaolinite–(NH4)2HPO4 sample system at various amounts of kaolinite (wt.%; reprinted with permission from Al-Rawajfeh et al., 2019, Elsevier B.V.).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Transmission electron microscopy images of (a) halloysite (Hal) nanotubes (HNTs) and (b) Hal–chitosan (Hal@CS) and (c) release of urea from Hal and Hal@CS (reprinted with permission from Wang et al., 2020, Elsevier B.V.). Transmission electron microscopy images of (d) Hal, (e) 2A-Hal, (f) 4A-Hal and (g) 6A-Haland (h) release behaviour of urea, slow-release fertilizers (SRFs) without Hal and fertilizers with Hal in distilled water (reprinted with permission from Wei et al., 2019, Elsevier B.V.). (i) The preparation process and schematic of the double network structure of the water-release fertilizers. Release of urea by the water-release fertilizers without Hal and the water-release fertilizers with Hal in (j) distilled water and (k) soil (reprinted with permission from Shen et al., 2020, Elsevier B.V.). MAH-CD = polymerizable β-cyclodextrin; SA = sodium alginate.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. (a) Scheme of the proposed path for urea intercalation in the extrusion process. (b) Release rate of urea as a function of time for pure urea and each of the composites at pH 7 and room temperature (reprinted with permission from Pereira et al., 2012, American Chemical Society). Field emission gun–scanning electron microscopy images of (c & d) chitosan microspheres and (e & f) ChMMt33 microspheres. (g) Effect of the initial concentration on the K-content microspheres (reprinted with permission from dos Santos et al., 2015, Elsevier Ltd). Mt/Ur = weight ratio of montmorillonite and urea.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. SEM images of the precipitates collected from various treatments. (a) Enterobacter sp. (San) cells were adsorbed on the montmorillonite (Mt) surface in beef extract peptone medium after 24 h of incubation (the initial composite before the treatment of San + hydroxylapatite (HAp) + Mt). Morphology of HAp particles in (a) control treatment, (b) San + HAp, (c) Hap + Mt and (d) San + HAp + Mt. Morphology of San adsorbed on the surface of Mt in San + HAp + Mt at (e) 24 h and (f) 72 h of incubation. (g) Concentrations of Ca and P analysed using inductively coupled plasma during 72 h of incubation (n = 3). A statistical analysis of P concentration was performed between San + HAp and San + HAp + Mt at the same incubation times, and the asterisk indicates a significant difference at p < 0.05 (reprinted with permission from Su et al., 2019, Elsevier B.V.). (h) SEM images of Aspergillus niger after 5 days of incubation with montmorillonite (Mon) (scale bar represents 10 μm). Energy-dispersive spectrometry showed the chemical distribution of (i) Al, (j) Si and (k) P in the presence of various clay minerals. (l) The acid sorption (pure oxalic acid at 50 ppm) ability of kaolinite (Kao), montmorillonite (Mon) and palygorskite (Pal) based on high-performance liquid chromatography analysis. Different lower-case letters indicate significant differences among the treatments (p < 0.05) (reprinted with permission from Zhang et al., 2019b, Elsevier B.V.).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Changes in the morphological structure of vermiculite during biofilm growth. (a) Biofilm formation observed using environment scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). (b) Proposed mechanism of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) removal during biofilm formation on vermiculite (reprinted with permission from Wen et al., 2016, Elsevier B.V.).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. (a) Schematic illustration of the fabrication procedure and mechanism of temperature-controlled-release and collectable iron fertilizer (TCIF). (b) Ratio collapse of TCIF in aqueous solution with time. (c) Reuse performance of TCIF (reprinted with permission from Chi et al., 2018, Elsevier B.V.). (d) Schematic illustration of periclase layered double hydroxides (PER@PLDH) and its calcined derivative (PER@PLDO). (e) Schematic mechanism of P adsorption onto PER@PLDH and PER@PLDO (reprinted with permission from Kong et al., 2019, Elsevier B.V.). (f) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of a water and nutrient loss-control agent (WNLCA). (g) Schematic diagram of the WNLCF structure. (h) Leaching loss-control ratios of water and nutrient loss-control urea (WNLCU). (i) Migration-to-surface loss-control ratios of 2 g of WNLCU with various WF/WNLCA weight ratios of a = 9.0:0.6, b = 9.0:0.8, c = 9.0:1.0 and d = 9.0:1.2 (reprinted with permission from Zhou et al., 2015, American Chemical Society). HA30 = attapulgite sample irradiated by 30 kGy; WNLCN = water and nutrient loss-control NH4Cl.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. (a) Schematic illustration of the mechanism involved in phosphate adsorption on Mar-BC800 and Sep-BC800 (reprinted with permission from Deng et al., 2021, Elsevier Ltd). (b) Effects of P-adsorbed 950-sepiolite (SPL) application and toxicity test. (c) Effects of P-adsorption capacity and phosphate removal from lake water (reprinted with permission from Hong et al., 2020, Elsevier Ltd). NC-SPL = non-calcined sepiolite; TU = toxic units.