Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-09T02:39:53.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Building up of a nested granite intrusion: magnetic fabric, gravity modelling and fluid inclusion planes studies in Santa Eulália Plutonic Complex (Ossa Morena Zone, Portugal)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2014

H. SANT’OVAIA*
Affiliation:
Geology Centre of Porto University, Department of Geosciences, Environment and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Sciences of Porto University, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
P. NOGUEIRA
Affiliation:
Geology Centre of Porto University, Geosciences Department of Évora University, Largo dos Colegiais 2, 7004-516 Évora, Portugal
J. CARRILHO LOPES
Affiliation:
Geology Centre of Lisbon University, Geosciences Department of Évora University, Largo dos Colegiais 2, 7004-516 Évora, Portugal
C. GOMES
Affiliation:
Geophysics Centre of University of Coimbra, Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology of University of Coimbra, Largo Marquês de Pombal, 3000-272 Coimbra, Portugal
M.A. RIBEIRO
Affiliation:
Geology Centre of Porto University, Department of Geosciences, Environment and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Sciences of Porto University, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
H.C.B. MARTINS
Affiliation:
Geology Centre of Porto University, Department of Geosciences, Environment and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Sciences of Porto University, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
A. DÓRIA
Affiliation:
Geology Centre of Porto University, Department of Geosciences, Environment and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Sciences of Porto University, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
C. CRUZ
Affiliation:
Geology Centre of Porto University, Department of Geosciences, Environment and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Sciences of Porto University, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
L. LOPES
Affiliation:
Geosciences Department of Évora University, Largo dos Colegiais 2, 7004-516 Évora, Portugal
R. SARDINHA
Affiliation:
Geosciences Department of Évora University, Largo dos Colegiais 2, 7004-516 Évora, Portugal
A. ROCHA
Affiliation:
Geophysics Centre of University of Coimbra, Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology of University of Coimbra, Largo Marquês de Pombal, 3000-272 Coimbra, Portugal
F. NORONHA
Affiliation:
Geology Centre of Porto University, Department of Geosciences, Environment and Spatial Planning, Faculty of Sciences of Porto University, Rua do Campo Alegre, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
*
†Author for correspondence: hsantov@fc.up.pt
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Santa Eulália Plutonic Complex (SEPC), located in the Ossa Morena Zone (south Portugal), is composed of a medium- to coarse-grained pink granite (G0-type) and a central grey medium-grained biotite granite (G1-type). Available Rb–Sr data indicates an age of 290 Ma. An emplacement model for the SEPC is proposed, taking into account magnetic fabric, 2D gravity modelling and fluid inclusion planes studies. The G0 and G1 types demonstrate different magnetic behaviour: G0 is considered a magnetite-type granite and G1 is an ilmenite-type granite. The formation of G0 required oxidized conditions related to the interaction of mafic rocks with a felsic magma. The 2D gravity modelling and subvertical magnetic lineations show that the feeder zone of the SEPC is located in the eastern part of the pluton, confirming the role of the Assumar and Messejana Variscan faults in the process of ascent and emplacement. The magma emplacement was controlled by ENE–WSW planar anisotropies related to the final brittle stages of the Variscan Orogeny. The emplacement of the two granites was almost synchronous as shown by their gradational contacts in the field. The magnetic fabric however suggests emplacement of the G0-type first, closely followed by emplacement of the G1-type, pushing the G0 laterally which becomes more anisotropic towards the margin. The G1-type became flattened, acquiring a dome-like structure. The SEPC is a nested pluton with G0-type granite assuming a tabular flat shape and G1-type forming a rooted dome-like structure. After emplacement, SEPC recorded increments of the late Variscan stress field documented by fluid inclusion planes in quartz.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 
Figure 0

Figure 1. Simplified geological map of the SEPC and its host rocks.

Figure 1

Figure 2. SiO2 v. FeOt/(FeOt/MgO) discriminant diagram for SEPC representative samples.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Mineralogy and microstructures observed in (A–E) facies G0 and (F–H) G1. All photomicrographs under crossed polars. (B, C) Subgrain boundaries in quartz; (D) bent plagioclase twins; (E) bent biotite clivages; and (G) rare undulatory extinction in quartz grains.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Sampling sites for AMS and IRM studies.

Figure 4

Table 1. AMS data for the sampling sites. Km – mean magnetic susceptibility in 10–6 SI; P– anisotropy degree; T – shape parameter; Dec, Inc – declination, inclination; E12, E23 and E31 – 95% confidence angles corresponding to the three axes; N – number of specimens; *: – discarded measurement; ** – not enough data.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Map of the magnetic susceptibility (Km) and histogram of the bulk susceptibility values.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Map of the anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility P and correlation between bulk susceptibility and magnetic anisotropy.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Map of shape parameter T and correlations with (a) bulk susceptibility; and (b) magnetic anisotropy.

Figure 8

Figure 8. Map of the magnetic foliations with orientation stereonets for the magnetic foliations poles (K3) for G0-type and G1-type (Schmidt, lower hemisphere projection, 1–5% area contours).

Figure 9

Figure 9. Map of the magnetic lineations with orientation stereonets for the magnetic lineations (K1) for G0-type (sector E and W) and G1-type (Schmidt, lower hemisphere projection, 1–5% area contours). Magmatic foliations are defined by preferred alignment of biotite and feldspar crystals.

Figure 10

Figure 10. Normalized magnetic susceptibility curves for continuously increasing (and decreasing) temperatures for (a) G0 (ASM76), showing dominantly ferromagnetic behaviour with magnetic susceptibility drop at 580ºC; and (b) G1 (Af57), showing dominantly paramagnetic behaviour with a decrease in magnetic susceptibility with increasing temperature.

Figure 11

Table 2. Saturation isothermal remanent magnetization (SIRM), isothermal remanent magnetization at 300 mT (IRM300), ratio of SIRM to magnetic susceptibility (SIRM/K) and ratio of IRM300 to SIRM in representative samples of the SEPC.

Figure 12

Figure 11. IRM normalized (IRM/SIRM) acquisition curves for the representative samples from (a) G0, (b) G1 and (c) M-group.

Figure 13

Figure 12. 2D Gravity modelling through the SEPC along E–W-oriented cross-sections.

Figure 14

Figure 13. Rose diagrams indicating the preferential orientation of the fluid inclusions planes. Example of oriented double-polished wafers and some studied fluid inclusions representative of the predominant orientations of quartz.

Figure 15

Figure 14. Plot of the relation between SIRM and magnetic susceptibility K for representative samples of G0, G1 and M-group.

Supplementary material: Image

Sant’ovaia Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Sant’ovaia Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 8.8 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Sant’ovaia Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Sant’ovaia Supplementary Material(Image)
Image 8.8 MB