Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-kv2lp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T10:08:17.854Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Broadband sub-THz spectroscopy modules integrated in 65-nm CMOS technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2017

Marion K. Matters-Kammerer*
Affiliation:
Mixed-Signal Microelectronics, Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Dave Van Goor
Affiliation:
Philips Lighting Research, High Tech Campus 7, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Lorenzo Tripodi
Affiliation:
Was with Philips Group Innovation, Research, Eindhoven. He is now with ASML Development & Engineering, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: M. K. Matters-Kammerer Email: m.matters@tue.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The design and characterization of a broadband 20–480 GHz continuously tuneable on-chip spectrometer based on non-linear transmission lines in 65-nm CMOS technology is presented. The design procedure of the sampler that detects the ultra-broadband signal from the transmitter in time and frequency domain is described in detail. It consists of a non-linear transmission line, a passive pulse differentiator and a high-speed sample and hold-circuit. The relevance of the layout of the Schottky diodes in the sampler with a maximum RC-cutoff frequency of 430 GHz is described. Time domain and frequency domain measurements are presented to characterize the 480 GHz sampler bandwidth as well as the 3.1 ps sampler rise time. A signal to noise ratio of 90 dB at 100 GHz, 70 dB at 200 GHz and more than 30 dB at 480 GHz is reached. Two implementation of the spectrometer with antennas are presented, one with an on-chip antenna and one in a hybrid package. The antenna-less on-chip implementation of the transmitter and sampler requires no external lenses and is miniaturized to an area of 3 mm2. Future applications include analysis of fluids in microfluidic packages or droplet analysis in bio-medical or pharmaceutical applications.

Information

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2017 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. System view of the on-chip spectrometer. The output of the sampling bridge can be visualized in time and frequency domain on an oscilloscope or a spectrum analyzer. The graphs show the time-domain and frequency domain signal at various locations in spectrometer [12].

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Schematic of the time domain spectrometer [10–12].

Figure 2

Fig. 3. RC-cutoff frequency of 65-nm CMOS Schottky diodes of 6.5 fF total junction capacitance with various electrode layouts [13]. In the sampling bridge presented in this paper, the square array of 64 minimum sized diodes was used with a cutoff frequency of 430 GHz.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Current-voltage characteristic of the Schottky diode used in the sampler. The inset shows the currents for the voltage interval between 0 and 0.8 V on a logarithmic scale for better visibility of the lower currents [12].

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Cross-section of the integrated sampling bridge, showing the vertical connections between the transmission line and the metal-insulator-metal (MIM) capacitors as well as the connection between the capacitors and the Schottky diodes [12].

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Measured impedance of the slotline and the coplanar waveguide. The inset shows the cross-section of the multimode transmission line structure. The slotline mode uses the two lines in Metal 6. The line in the Metal 5 layer is located in the horizontal symmetry plane. The coplanar waveguide mode uses the lines in metal 6 as ground and the line in the Metal 5 layer as signal line.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. T-junction between the 50 Ω coplanar waveguide from the non-linear transmission line and the slotlines of the sampler. The arm length between the junction and the short circuits on both sides has been optimized to 300 µm to reach maximum bandwidth of the sampler.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Left: photograph of the sampler. Right: photograph of the entire spectrometer. The NLTL on the left hand side is the transmitter, the one from below is part of the sampler and connects to the sampling bridge. The whole spectrometer requires about 3 mm2.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Voltage envelope of the NLTL signal measured at the IF frequency range with an oscilloscope. The time-scale is translated to the original speed of the signal.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Convoluted fall-time as a function of the bias voltage for two values of the IF frequency offset between the two NLTL signals at the generator and sampler side. The bias voltage is the bias across the Schottky diodes of the sampling bridge.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Output power and noise power level of the spectrometer for 0.56 and 0.425 V sampler bias voltage (resolution bandwidth 1 Hz). The output spectrum of the NLTL contains only harmonics of the 20 GHz input frequency. Continuous lines are added as a guide for the reader. The output power of the spectrometer alone is 10 dB higher, as a 10 dB attenuator was inserted to mimic a real droplet sample. Over the measured frequency range the average noise power is about −140 dBm. The variation and especially the maxima of the noise power at 180, 300, and 400 GHz are not related to the spectrometer itself, but due to resonances in the measurement setup. For the conversion to signal-to-noise ratio shown in [12], an average noise power of −140 dBm is used.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Hybrid transmitter (left) [9] and receiver (right) module in a chip-scale package. The package contains a Teflon lens, a broadband Vivaldi antenna, the CMOS non-linear transmission line-based transmitter /receiver chip with DC and coaxial RF interconnect (from the top).

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Dynamic range of the free-space spectrometer based on the hybrid modules shown in Fig. 12 [8].

Figure 13

Fig. 14. Left: non-linear transmission line-based broadband transmitter [15] with integrated broadband antenna. Right: high-speed sampling circuit with integrated antenna. Both modules were laser-cut out of the 65-nm CMOS wafer. The small black dots are debris from the cutting process. Due to a protection layer on top of the circuits, they did not influence the performance.

Figure 14

Table 1. Performance comparison to prior art in CMOS and BiCMOS technology.