Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8rzl6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T08:40:48.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environmental drivers of benthic communities and habitat heterogeneity on an East Antarctic shelf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2016

Alexandra L. Post*
Affiliation:
Geoscience Australia, GPO Box 378, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
Caroline Lavoie
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences/CESAM, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal
Eugene W. Domack
Affiliation:
College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA
Amy Leventer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Colgate University, Hamilton, NY 13346, USA
Amelia Shevenell
Affiliation:
College of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33701, USA
Alexander D. Fraser
Affiliation:
Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 80, Hobart, TAS 7001, Australia Institute for Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Kita-19, Nishi-8, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060-0819, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study presents the first analysis of benthic megafauna and habitats from the Sabrina Coast shelf, encompassing a proposed Marine Protected Area. Sea bed imagery indicated an abundant benthic fauna compared to other parts of the Antarctic shelf, dominated by brittle stars, polychaete tubeworms, and a range of other sessile and mobile taxa. The distribution of taxa was related (ρ=0.592, P<0.001) to variations in water depth, latitude, substrate type and phytodetritus. High phytodetritus cover was associated with muddy/sandy sediments and abundant holothurians and amphipods, while harder substrates hosted abundant brachiopods, hard bryozoans, polychaete tubeworms, massive and encrusting sponges, and sea whips. Brittle stars, irregular urchins and anemones were ubiquitous. Variations in substrate largely reflected the distribution of dropstones, creating fine-scale habitat heterogeneity. Several taxa were found only on hard substrates, and their broad regional distribution indicated that the density of dropstones was sufficient for most sessile invertebrates to disperse across the region. The hexactinellid sponge Anoxycalyx joubini and branching hydrocorals exhibited a more restricted distribution, probably related to water depth and limited dispersal capability, respectively. Dropstones were associated with significant increases in taxa diversity, abundance and biological cover, enhancing the overall diversity and biomass of this ecosystem.

Information

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 MODIS satellite image from 26 February 2014 showing the sea ice distribution in the study region. The survey area (shown in blue) is located within the Dalton Iceberg Tongue polynya. MPA=marine protected area.

Figure 1

Table I Yoyo camera transects completed during NBP 14-02. Position is shown for the mid-point of each transect.

Figure 2

Table II Additional physical datasets included in this study. Values were derived from the mid-point of each transect.

Figure 3

Fig. 2 Percent cover of substrate types averaged within each transect. Note that boulders on Transects 20 and 52 have occurrences of<0.2%, so are not visible on the pie charts. Insets show enhanced views of selected transects over multibeam bathymetry data.

Figure 4

Table III List of all taxa observed and identified according to the CATAMI scheme (Althaus et al.2015) and their total abundance.

Figure 5

Table IV Most abundant megafaunal taxa across the study area, with average and maximum numbers of individuals m-2 and percent occurrence across all images. Numbers in brackets indicate the transect on which the maximum number for that taxa occurred.

Figure 6

Fig. 3a Relative abundance of taxa averaged within each transect. Insets show enhanced views over multibeam bathymetry for selected transects. b. Average values for Shannon diversity, individuals m-2, and percent biological cover for each transect. The individuals m-2 range from 8 (Transect 52) to 60 (Transect 47), while percent biological cover ranges from 5 (Transect 40) to 52 (Transect 47).

Figure 7

Fig. 4 Representative taxa on sea floor transects for soft (a., f.), mixed (b.) and hard substrates (c., d., e.). A=anemone, A-sc/A-uns=ascidian, stalked colonial/unstalked solitary, B=brachiopod, Bs=brittle star, B-hb/B-en/B-sd/B-sf=bryozoan, hard branching/encrusting/soft dendroid/soft foliaceous, C-un=crinoid, unstalked, F=fish, G-bbs/G-f=gorgonian bottle-brush, simple/fan, H-if/H-iv/H-m=holothurian infaunal/on invertebrate/mobile, Hy-b=hydrocoral, branching, Hy-cf=hydroid, colonial feathered, PD=phytodetritus, Pt=polychaete tube, S-b/S-bl/S-eb/S-en/S-es/S-t=sponge, barrel/ball/erect branching/encrusting/erect simple/tube, Sp=sea spider. Scale bars indicate 10 cm.

Figure 8

Fig. 5 Principle co-ordinates analysis of assemblage counts. a. Symbols represent substrate type with Spearman rank correlation of physical variables overlain as vectors. Variables in bold text have the highest combined correlation (0.592, P<0.001) against the assemblage counts using the BEST routine. b. Symbols indicate the number of individuals (m-2) at each datapoint with Spearman rank correlation of key taxa overlain as vectors. c. Symbols represent the Shannon diversity of taxa at each datapoint.

Figure 9

Fig. 6 Composition of most abundant taxa up to 90% total abundance for a. soft and b. hard substrates.

Figure 10

Fig. 7 Average abundance, cover and diversity indices according to substrate type, with standard deviation indicated by the bars. Note the change in scale from the left to right.

Figure 11

Fig. 8 Multidimensional scale plot of taxa abundance and composition based on Bray-Curtis similarity across hard and mixed substrates. a. Symbols represent transects. b. Symbol size indicates water depth.

Figure 12

Table V Percent abundance and average count of individuals m-2 for taxa found only on hard substrates. Transects are labelled according to their locality. Transect 40 is not shown as it contained no hard substrates.

Figure 13

Fig. 9 The percent cover of hard substrate is associated with changes in the number of individuals and Shannon diversity along Transect 50. Representative examples of sea floor images are shown, numbered according to image number, with a 10 cm scale bar. Images were selected to highlight a range of different taxa colonizing the hard substrates and to show examples of mixed hard and soft substrates in a single image.

Figure 14

Table VI Comparison of abundance and key taxa based on photographic studies at comparative depths on Antarctica’s continental shelf. Mean abundances of megafauna are shown in brackets.