Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rdgjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T08:59:12.649Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Alloy development and reheating process exploration of Al–Si casting alloys with globular grains for thixoforming

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 May 2016

Jiao Jiao Wang*
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Pressure Systems and Safety, Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
Zhong Min Zhang
Affiliation:
Research and Development Department, Shanghai Junsoft Digital Science & Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200051, China
A.B. Phillion
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton L8S 4L7, Ontario, Canada
Shu Zhen Shang
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Pressure Systems and Safety, Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
Gui Min Lu*
Affiliation:
The Key Laboratory of Pressure Systems and Safety, Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
*
a) Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: jiaojiaowang.wendy@hotmail.com
b) e-mail: gmlu@ecust.edu.cn

Abstract

A novel two-stage reheating process with new alloy design has been developed to improve the microstructure morphology of semisolid Al–Si casting aluminum alloy for thixoforming. The process consists of first reheating the material to the liquidus temperature, holding for 5 min, and then lowering to the predetermined two-stage reheating temperature between 843–863 K and holding for 10 min. The experimentally-obtained grain diameter, roundness, and the amount of liquid trapped within the solid phase were characterized, along with the microstructure obtained using the traditional feedstock reheating process. The Wilcox test (with α = 0.05) was then applied to statistically analyze the measured differences in the microstructures obtained using the two different processing routes. It was found that a refined near-spherical structure with uniform globule size, higher sphericity, lower coarsening rate constant, and less entrapped liquid was obtained via the new two-stage reheating process in comparison with the microstructure obtained using the traditional feedstock reheating process.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 
Figure 0

TABLE I. Chemical compositions (wt%) of 356.0 alloy in ASM Handbook and developed 356.0v alloy measured with a PMI-MASTER PRO.

Figure 1

FIG. 1. Initial dendritic microstructure of the 356.0v casting alloy obtained by vertical electromagnetic continuous casting.

Figure 2

FIG. 2. Differential thermal analysis curve of 356.0v during heating process at a rate of 10 K/min.

Figure 3

FIG. 3. Change in liquid fraction with temperature of 356.0v casting alloy derived from the recorded DSC curve at a heating rate of 10 K/min.

Figure 4

FIG. 4. Reheating temperatures versus times used for investigation of the two-step reheating process for Al–Si casting alloy.

Figure 5

TABLE II. The p-values from the Wilcox tests (α = 0.05) for the parameter of roundness of solid grains measured results from IPP and the mathematic theoretical results by using Eq. (2) at the same experimental condition.

Figure 6

FIG. 5. Microstructures of 356.0v obtained from traditional (a1, b1, and c1) and two-stage (a2, b2, and c2) reheating process prepared at 843 K with different soaking periods: (a) 15 min; (b) 20 min; (c) 25 min.

Figure 7

FIG. 6. Microstructures of 356.0v obtained from traditional (a1, b1, and c1) and two-stage (a2, b2, and c2) reheating process prepared at 853 K and with different soaking periods: (a) 15 min; (b) 20 min; (c) 25 min.

Figure 8

FIG. 7. Microstructures of 356.0v obtained from traditional (a1, b1, and c1) and two-stage (a2, b2, and c2) reheating process prepared at 863 K with different soaking periods: (a) 15 min; (b) 20 min; (c) 25 min.

Figure 9

FIG. 8. Dependence of (a) equivalent diameter, roundness and (b) coarsening rate constant and fraction entrapped liquid on holding time at a temperature of 853 K from the traditional and two-stage reheating process for 356.0v casting alloy.

Figure 10

TABLE III. The p-values from the Wilcox tests (α = 0.05) for the microstructure morphology parameters measured from the traditional and two-stage reheating samples prepared with the same temperatures and holding periods.

Figure 11

TABLE IV. The p-value of Wilcox tests (α = 0.05) for coarsening rate constant during two different reheating processes.