Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-6grmk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-04T21:26:39.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2026

Thorsten Kahlert*
Affiliation:
Geography, Archaeology & Palaeoecology, Queen’s University Belfast , UK
Ryan Rabett
Affiliation:
Geography, Archaeology & Palaeoecology, Queen’s University Belfast , UK Institute for Hellenic Culture & the Liberal Arts, The American College of Greece , Greece
Linh Duy Vu
Affiliation:
Tràng An Landscape Complex Management Board, Vietnam
Khanh Sinh Pham
Affiliation:
Tràng An Landscape Complex Management Board, Vietnam
Shawn O’Donnell
Affiliation:
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew , UK
Evan Hill
Affiliation:
Geography, Archaeology & Palaeoecology, Queen’s University Belfast , UK
Maarten Blaauw
Affiliation:
Geography, Archaeology & Palaeoecology, Queen’s University Belfast , UK
*
Corresponding author: Thorsten Kahlert; Email: t.kahlert@qub.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ecological and socio-economic services that deltas provide are central to regional infrastructure, sustainable development and climate-change adaptation strategies. Approximately 45% of the global deltaic population resides within South and Southeast Asian mega-deltas. The two principal Vietnamese deltas (Mekong and Song Hong/Red River) account for almost half of that total and have been the subject to sedimentological, hydrogeological and seismic research. However, some inconsistencies remain. Analysis of tidal notches provides an independent, complementary dataset for studying relative sea-level change and associated processes. We present a Late Pleistocene–Late Holocene inundation chronology for the Red River Delta. Pleistocene dates (52–29 cal. kBP) are cautiously attributed to late phases of the Vinh Phuc transgression. Periods of sea-level stabilisation are confirmed leading up to, during and after the Dong Da/Flandrian transgression (6–4 cal. kBP). Results highlight the complexity of past sea-level change in tropical deltaic settings and the value of palaeoecological records to capture sea-level dynamics outside the reach of modern instrumentation. Potential linkage between relative sea level and variability in the strength of the Asian Summer Monsoon/El Niño-La Niña system is posited. Coupling of sea-level regression to climate conditions during the 4.2 and 2.8 ka Cold Events in particular warrants further investigation.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Notch site at Tam Coc. Possibly a tidal notch that either formed under medium exposure conditions that led to the formation of a secondary infralittoral zone or sheltered conditions, which would account for its deep and narrow v-shape. In this case, the presence of two apexes may indicate periods of SL still stand (image: Kahlert). (b) Thanh Boat wharf notch site. Oyster shells were found concreted to the inside of a karst conduit. While no notch was present at the sampling location, its elevation is consistent with the upper notch sequences that are present throughout Thay Vi valley (image: Kahlert). (c) Oyster shell fragments were found in sediments concreted to the Thay Vi lower notch sequence (image: Kahlert). (d) Oyster shell fragments were found in sediments concreted to the Thay Vi upper notch sequence. (e) Co Vien Lau notch site. Oyster shells were concreted into recesses within the upper notch (image: Kahlert).Figure 1. long description.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Red River Delta and locations of sampling sites in Tràng An and Halong Bay (image: Kahlert). (b) Location of sample sites within the Tràng An WHS property (image: Kahlert). (c) Location of dated oysters within the Thai Vi valley of the Tràng An massif (image: Kahlert).Figure 2. long description.

Figure 2

Table 1. Calibration results (R – rice) of Pleistocene dates and elevations adjusted to isostasyTable 1. long description.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Sea-level reconstruction for the RRD during the Mid–Late Holocene. Ostreidae and Meretrix sp. (blue points, 95% ranges as error bars) and the single charcoal (red, 95% range) radiocarbon ages are plotted against measured elevations. The black line represents the loess-smoothed median SL curve with 95% uncertainty (green shaded ribbon), based on Marine20 calibration with ΔR = −190 ± 23 years. Orange bars represent the regional onset and duration of the 4.2 and 2.8 cal. kBP Cold Events.Figure 3. long description.

Figure 4

Table 2. Calibration results (R – rice) of Holocene dates and elevations adjusted to isostasyTable 2. long description.

Supplementary material: File

Kahlert et al. supplementary material

Kahlert et al. supplementary material
Download Kahlert et al. supplementary material(File)
File 116.9 KB

Author comment: New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events — R0/PR1

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Review of Kahlert et al., submitted to Cambridge Prisms: Coastal Futures (CFT-2025-0060)

General comments:

The manuscript is generally well-written and suitably referenced throughout. I have noted some minor changes to wording under the “Specific comments” section below.

I have three main concerns which I think should be addressed by the authors prior to this being suitable for publication in coastal futures.

1. Vertical uncertainty of SL indicators

2. Lack of photos showing notches and oyster or other dated materials in sampling locations.

3. Need for a better ‘sell’ with respect to coastal futures as the appropriate journal.

1. Vertical uncertainty of SL indicators

I am concerned that there is no appropriate consideration given to the vertical uncertainty associated with oysters or other materials found within the notches. This is borne out by the lack of vertical uncertainty margins for samples in Fig. 2b. The generally accepted practice for palaeo SL reconstruction is to establish an ‘indicative meaning’ for each SL marker with standardized procedures for computing uncertainties associated with this and other elements of the vertical component of the marker. See for reference Rovere, A., Raymo, M. E., Vacchi, M., Lorscheid, T., Stocchi, P., Gómez-Pujol, L., Harris, D. L., Casella, E., O’Leary, M. J., & Hearty, P. J. (2016). The analysis of Last Interglacial (MIS 5e) relative sea-level indicators: Reconstructing sea-level in a warmer world. In Earth-Science Reviews (Vol. 159, pp. 404–427). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.06.006

I suggest the authors need to address this issue with respect to the specific chosen indicators e.g. oyster beds, cataloguing the modern analogue, its elevation range and all other necessary elements to properly present the elevation of the chosen indicators in this study with a suitable uncertainty margin. I hope this that has already been completed so that providing this data (maybe as supplementary) will be straightforward and Fig. 2b can be revised accordingly with vertical uncertainty margins on the points.

2. Lack of photos showing notches and oyster or other dated materials in sampling locations.

While noting that there is constraint on the number of visual items permitted in this journal, the paper would be greatly improved by photos showing the notches and sampling locations. I note that there are some nice photos in the QSR paper by the lead author and this paper would benefit from such photos. It would also enable readers to better assess the evidence for raised sea levels from these features.

3. Need for a better ‘sell’ with respect to coastal futures as the appropriate journal.

There is a need to better emphasise why a paleo SL reconstruction study is suitable for this journal. I suggest that this be done by making the relevance to potential future SL impacts in this region less of an afterthought in the text.

Specific Comments:

P. 4 L. 40: Maybe round these numbers given the approximate/ rounded numbers in sentences nearby.

P.5 L.35: Is “geomorphological uplift” the correct term? Just uplift? Or tectonic uplift?

P. 9 L.24 adopted rather than adapted?

P.11 L.52 deposition, not disposition?

P.12 L.11 revise grammar “does also includes”

P.12 L.42 revise grammar “may remained waterfilled”

P.12 L.50 deposition, not disposition?

P.12 L.58 Revise “Behind the ebb and flow of more coarse-grained and widely cited global models”. I would avoid this type of colloquial or cliché language.

P.13 L.5-6 Revise “While the fidelity of the current study is constrained by its requirement for extended periods of sea level stability,”. It is not clear to me what you mean here…rephrase to something like: “The precise reconstruction of relative sea level in the current study demonstrates extended periods of sea level stability.”

Review: New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The manuscript entitled “A Late Pleistocene to Late Holocene 14C-dated sea-notch chronology tracking inundation of the Song Hong (Red River) Delta, Vietnam” contributes to the reconstruction of Holocene sea-level change in Southeast Asia, within the complex geomorphological setting of the Red River Delta.

The principal contribution of the study lies in the identification of 30 tidal notches, many of which are dated using palaeontological evidence, leading to the development of a robust chronological framework. This is supported by a synthesis of regional knowledge and by consideration of existing estimates and models concerning the formation of marine terraces.

While the dataset presented is valuable and merits publication, the manuscript in its current form requires substantial revision. The structure is disorganised, with methods, results, and discussion frequently intermingled. To ensure that the significance of this geochronological contribution is fully realised, both the formal presentation and the geomorphological interpretation require improvement.

I have provided several detailed comments throughout the manuscript.

First, the introduction should be clearer and more tightly focused on the research objectives. It should not emphasise tangential and overly general topics such as population dynamics and human occupation of Southeast Asian deltas. If the central aim of the study is to address Holocene sea-level rise, the introduction should instead concentrate on this theme, presenting the current state of knowledge and clearly identifying the gaps that the study seeks to address. In its present form, the introduction contains a considerable amount of extraneous material and lacks sufficient substantive focus.

Secondly, the Methods section is highly problematic and lacks coherence. The procedure used to identify the tidal notches is not clearly explained. It is unclear whether their identification resulted from a prior exploratory field campaign, a systematic literature review, or a combination of both. Although the manuscript later describes the recording of location and elevation data relative to a reference datum, the absence of a clear explanation of the notch morphometry makes it difficult to determine which datum is actually being used.

The morphometric approach and measurement protocol should be described explicitly. While the authors cite key references such as Pirazzoli and Trenhaile, they introduce their own terminology without justification or clarification. This inconsistency requires resolution. Furthermore, appropriate supporting material should be provided, including photographs of representative notches and schematic diagrams illustrating the measurements performed. A table summarising the morphometric data should also be included in the Results section.

The Methods section is further weakened by the premature introduction of results and even conclusions. The manuscript should be reorganised in a more logical manner, ensuring a clear separation between methods, results, and discussion, so that readers can easily follow the analytical framework and appreciate the study’s contribution.

The radiometric dating section is comparatively better structured; however, it provides very limited information on the dating techniques themselves, beyond identifying the laboratory responsible for the analyses. There is no discussion of how palaeontological samples were collected, selected, or taxonomically classified. Instead, disproportionate emphasis is placed on corrections and reservoir effects. This section therefore requires rebalancing. As elsewhere, the dating subsection anticipates results and discussion, which should be avoided.

With regard to the Results section, the presentation should follow the logical sequence established in the Methods. The characteristics of the notches should be described first, followed by their altimetric positions and then the chronological data. Only after these elements have been clearly presented should the Discussion be developed, which currently constitutes the majority of the manuscript’s text.

In the Conclusions, I recommend removing the broad and general statements attempting to link palaeo–sea-level reconstructions with contemporary coastal management practices, as these connections are not sufficiently substantiated by the results presented.

Given that the manuscript requires substantial reorganisation, I have not undertaken a detailed review of the bibliographic content. Nevertheless, the references should be carefully revised to ensure consistency of formatting and correct in-text citation. Assertions should be clearly supported by specific references, rather than followed by undifferentiated lists of citations, which currently make it difficult to discern individual scholarly contributions. This issue is particularly evident in the study site description.

Finally, in addition to the seminal work of Pirazzoli (1980s) and Alan Trenhaile, the authors are encouraged to engage with more recent literature on marine notches and palaeo–sea-level indicators. Notably, the comprehensive review by Alessio Rovere et al. (2016) in Earth-Science Reviews, as well as the numerous contributions by Stefano Furlani and Antonioli in the Adriatic region, would provide valuable context and strengthen the manuscript’s theoretical framework.

Recommendation: New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events — R0/PR4

Comments

Both Reviewers raise some significant issues with your manuscript that must be addressed before publication. One key point that also must be addressed is link the content of the manuscript to both the Journal itself and, more specifically, the topic of the Special Issue. As part of the revision process, the manuscript will require some reframing to articulate how the content of the manuscript clearly links with the focus of the Special Issue (and Journal more broadly) along with clear consideration and incorporation of the Reviewers' comments.

Decision: New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events — R1/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The revised manuscript has substantially improved upon the issues identified in the previous version. The structure and contextualization help the international audience understand the scope of the problem and how the article contributes to solving it. The case study approach is greatly enhanced, and the article has a broad scope and advances the discipline.

The methods and nature of the fieldwork are better explained, and the presentation of results and discussion is now easier to follow.

In my opinion, the revised version is now ready for publication.

Review: New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events — R1/PR8

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

I have evaluated the revised manuscript submitted by Kahlert et al. CFT-2025-0060.R1.

The manuscript has been greatly improved in accordance with my previous comments. In particular, the addition of explicit consideration for the issues around indicative meaning have been addressed with the revised SL envelope significantly more robust. The addition of photos of some of the field sites is also excellent. Overall, the manuscript has also been revised to include a greater emphasis on ‘future’ coasts, including the relevance of studies of past SL change in constraining future SL projections. I have some very minor further suggestions which I think will help the final article. I also note the word limit has been exceeded (5000 words for a regular article) but this seems acceptable given the discussion of both sea levels and their relationship to regional climate drivers.

Minor comments:

“Data collection” is not a great keyword. Suggest revise the keywords in general.

Somewhere in the first paragraph of the introduction it would be worth citing to the two recent papers on deltas led by Edward Anthony:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2025.105302

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-024-01426-3

Should “3.1 Limitations” be 3.4?

P14. Line 24: the phrase “shallow increase” is awkward – revise.

Recommendation: New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events — R1/PR9

Comments

Please ensure the minor typographical and citation comments by the reviewers are addressed in the manuscript during the proofing stage.

Decision: New Pleistocene–Holocene 14C tidal notch chronology (Red River Delta, Vietnam) reveals Mid-Late Holocene sea-level curve and correspondence to extreme hydroclimate events — R1/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.