Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-rngvg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-06T08:15:08.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reference values for two-dimensional myocardial strain echocardiography of the left ventricle in healthy children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2019

Laurens P. Koopman*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Bas Rebel
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Devi Gnanam
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Mirthe E. Menting
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Willem A. Helbing
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Eric Boersma
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
*
Author for correspondence: Laurens P. Koopman, E-mail: l.koopman@erasmusmc.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Myocardial deformation by speckle tracking echocardiography provides additional information on left ventricular function. Values of myocardial deformation (strain and strain rate) depend on the type of ultrasound machine and software that is used. Normative values for QLAB (Philips) are scarce, especially for children. It is important to evaluate the influence of age and body size on myocardial deformation parameters, since anthropometrics strongly influence many standard echocardiographic parameters. The aim of this study was to provide comprehensive normal values for myocardial deformation of the left ventricle using a Philips platform and to evaluate the association with anthropometric and standard echocardiographic parameters.

Methods

Healthy children between 1 and 18 years of age were prospectively examined using a standard echocardiographic protocol. Short-axis and apical four-chamber, two-chamber, and three-chamber views were used to measure peak systolic circumferential and longitudinal strain and systolic and early diastolic strain rate of the left ventricle using dedicated software.

Results

A total of 103 children were included with a mean age of 10.8 and inter-quartile range 7.3–14.3 years. Global circumferential strain values (±SD) were −24.2±3.5% at basal, −25.8±3.5% at papillary muscle, and −31.9±6.2% at apex levels. Global left ventricular longitudinal strain values were −20.6±2.6% in apical four-chamber view, −20.9±2.7% in apical two-chamber, and −21.0 ±2.7% in apical three-chamber. Age was associated with longitudinal strain, longitudinal systolic and early diastolic strain rate, but not with circumferential strain.

Conclusions

Normal values for left ventricular deformation parameters in children are obtained using a Philips platform. Age partly explains normal variation of strain and strain rate.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Example of measurement of longitudinal strain (a) and strain rate (b) from apical 4-chamber view and circumferential strain at the papillary muscle level of the short axis view (c).

Figure 1

Table 1 General characteristics, ventricular dimensions, and function in 103 participants.

Figure 2

Figure 2 Global peak systolic circumferential strain at the basal level (a), papillary muscle level (b) and apical level (c) by age. Lines represent mean and 95% confidence interval.

Figure 3

Table 2 Peak systolic strain left ventricle, normal values, categorised for four age groups.

Figure 4

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate regression models for global peak systolic circumferential strain LV (mean of three levels).

Figure 5

Figure 3 Mean peak systolic circumferential strain depending on the segment analyzed. 1p < 0.001 for comparison with all other segment, paired sample t-test; 21 < 0.01 versus lateral; 3p < 0.001 versus posterior, 4p = 0.001 versusinferior; 5p < 0.001 versus inferior and septal; 6p < 0.001 versus inferior and septal; 7p = 0.01 versus septal.

Figure 6

Figure 4 Global peak systolic longitudinal strain of the apical 4-chamber view (a), apical 2-chamber view (b) and apical 3-chamber view (c) by age. Lines represent mean and 95% confidence interval.

Figure 7

Table 4 Univariate and multivariate regression models LV global longitudinal strain.

Figure 8

Figure 5 Mean peak systolic longitudinal strain depending on the level (basal, mid, apical) analyzed. ∗p-value < 0.001 for difference between mid and basal and difference between mid and apical, paired sample-test.

Figure 9

Figure 6 Global longitudinal systolic strain rate (a) and early diastolic strain rate (b) by age. Lines represent mean and 95% confidence interval.

Figure 10

Table 5 Univariate and multivariate regression models of LV systolic and early diastolic longitudinal strain rate.

Figure 11

Table 6 Intra- and inter-observer variability by two-dimensional strain measurements of the LV.

Figure 12

Figure 7 Feasibility of segmental and global peak systolic circumferential and longitudinal strain.

Figure 13

Table 7 Influence of subjective image quality on myocardial strain and SR parameters.