Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-npj9w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-08T14:42:51.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Haemodynamic impact of chest compressions in the delivery room

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2022

Girija Natarajan*
Affiliation:
Discipline of Pediatrics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA
Monika Bajaj
Affiliation:
Discipline of Pediatrics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA
Sanjeev Aggarwal
Affiliation:
Discipline of Pediatrics, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Detroit, MI, USA
*
Author for correspondence: G. Natarajan, MD, Division of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, 3901 Beaubien Blvd, Detroit, MI, USA. Tel: 313 231 0083; Fax: 313 7455867. E-mail: gnataraj@dmc.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Among 65 neonates with encephalopathy undergoing cooling, 30 (46.1%) received chest compressions during delivery room resuscitation. Despite differences in encephalopathy severity, early (<24 hours) biventricular function on echocardiogram (fractional area change, myocardial performance indices, systolic to diastolic duration ratios, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion) was comparable between groups with and without chest compressions. Epinephrine receipt was associated with abnormal tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Comparison of echocardiographic characteristics in the groups of neonates with encephalopathy who did and did not undergo delivery room chest compressions.

Figure 1

Table 2. Comparison of echocardiographic characteristics in the groups of neonates with Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy who did and did not require Epinephrine for resuscitation.

Supplementary material: File

Natarajan et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Natarajan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.3 KB