Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T13:48:43.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Isolation of male and female gametes, zygotes and proembryos of leek (Allium tuberosum Roxb)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2020

Yi Hua Lin
Affiliation:
Zhangzhou Health Vocational College, Zhangzhou363000, China
Mei Zhen Lin
Affiliation:
Zhangzhou Health Vocational College, Zhangzhou363000, China
Yu Qing Chen
Affiliation:
Zhangzhou Health Vocational College, Zhangzhou363000, China
Hui Qiao Tian*
Affiliation:
School of Life Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen361102, China
*
Address for correspondence: Hui Qiao Tian. School of Life Sciences. Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian361102, China. Tel: +11 86 592 2186486. E-mail: hqtian@xmu.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The isolation of male and female gametes is an effective method to study the fertilization mechanisms of higher plants. An osmotic shock method was used to rupture pollen grains of Allium tuberosum Roxb and release the pollen contents, including generative cells, which were mass collected. The pollinated styles were cut following 3 h of in vivo growth, and cultured in medium for 6–8 h, during which time pollen tubes grew out of the cut end of the style. After pollen tubes were transferred into a solution containing 6% mannitol, tubes burst and released pairs of sperm cells. Ovules of A. tuberosum were incubated in an enzyme solution for 30 min, and then dissected to remove the integuments. Following transfer to a dissecting solution free of enzymes, each nucellus was cut in the middle, and squeezed gently on the micropylar end, resulting in the liberation of the egg, zygote and proembryo from ovules at selected stages. These cells can be used to explore fertilization and embryonic development using molecular biological methods for each cell type and development stage.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2020
Figure 0

Figure 1. Inflorescence and gynoecia of A. tuberosum. (A) Inflorescence of A. tuberosum at anthesis. (B) Two gynoecia of A. tuberosum, left exhibiting a 1 mm style at anthesis, and right a 4 mm style with an inflated stigma 2 day after anthesis.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Isolation of the generative cell and sperm cells of A. tuberosum. (A) A ruptured pollen grain after osmotic shock that releases its generative cell (arrow). (B) Fluorescence reaction of fluorescein diacetate (FDA) confirms the viability of the released generative cells (arrow). (C) FDA fluorescence of pollen content diminished in intensity at 10 min after pollen rupturing. (D) Population of collected generative cells that still retain their fusiform in shape at 10 min after release from pollen grains. (E) Population of collected generative cells that become spherical in shape by 20 min after release from pollen grains. (F) Population of collected generative cells with FDA fluorescence at 20 min after isolation. (G) Pollen tubes (arrow) growing out of the cut end of the style following in vivo–in vitro culture. (H) A pair of sperm cells released from a ruptured pollen tube. (I) FDA fluorescence reaction confirmed the viability of the released sperm cells. (J) Released male germ unit (MGU) (Russell, 1984) with the two sperm cells (Svn: sperm associated with the vegetative nucleus) and a vegetative nucleus (arrow). (K) Population of collected Svn sperm cells. (L) Population of collected Sua sperm cells. Bar=10 µm.

Figure 2

Table 1. The frequency of pollen germination and broken in different sucrose solutions

Figure 3

Table 2. The effect of different solutions of sucrose on pollen tube growth

Figure 4

Figure 3. Isolation of egg cell and zygote of A. tuberosum. (A) The nucellar part of the ovule after the integument has been softened by enzymatic digestion and then removed from the integument by dissection, displaying its egg apparatus in the embryo sac (arrow). The line indicates the position of the cut during dissection. (B) The three egg apparatus cells released from the embryo sac. (C) FDA fluorescence reaction confirmed the release of a viable egg and a synergid cell in (B). Another synergid cell has very weak fluorescence intensity. (D) Egg apparatus isolated from the embryo sac of a flower at anthesis. (E) Egg apparatus isolated from the embryo sac of a flower at 1 day after anthesis, showing an increase in cell size. (F) Egg apparatus isolated from a flower at 2 days after anthesis, showing a decrease in cell size. At this time, the stigma is receptive to pollen and pollen germination can proceed. (G) Egg cell isolated from the egg apparatus. (H) FDA fluorescence reaction confirmed egg cell viability. (I) Isolated egg cell was collected using a micromanipulator pipette. (J) Population of five egg cells, two only partially visible in the field of view. (K) Zygote isolated from a pollinated flower at 12 h. (L) FDA fluorescence reaction confirmed zygote viability in (K). e, egg; s, synergid cell; z, zygote. Bar=10 µm.

Figure 5

Figure 4. Isolation of proembryos of A. tuberosum. (A) Isolated two-celled proembryo with a small apical cell (ac) and a large basal cell (bc). (B) FDA fluorescence reaction confirmed both cells with near similar intensity, indicating the same viability. (C) Both cells of a two-celled proembryo becoming separated from one another in an enzyme solution. (D) Both cells in (C) totally separated following enzyme treatment. (E) Four collected apical cells. (F) Two collected basal cells. (G) Isolated four-celled proembryo. Arrows indicate each of the four cells. (H) Proembryo in (G) shows a different FDA fluorescence intensity among the four cells; the three smaller cells show stronger fluorescence intensity of staining than the large one. (I) Two isolated four-celled proembryos from an ovary. (J) Six isolated embryo proper cells. (K) Two isolated basal cells that will form a suspensor. (L) An isolated six-celled proembryo. Bar=10 µm.

Figure 6

Table 3. effect of enzymes on the egg apparatus isolation. Each result was obtained from 30 ovules and in 30 min

Figure 7

Table 4. The effect of osmolality on egg isolation in dissecting solution. Each result was obtained from 30 ovules and in 30 min