Hostname: page-component-74656f9884-8r8nv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-11-07T08:42:44.439Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Prescreening Hydraulic Lime-Binders for Disordered Calcite in Caesarea Maritima: Characterizing the Chemical Environment Using FTIR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2020

Yotam Asscher*
Affiliation:
Israel Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem, Israel
Aliza van Zuiden
Affiliation:
Israel Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem, Israel
Chen Elimelech
Affiliation:
Israel Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem, Israel
Peter Gendelman
Affiliation:
Israel Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem, Israel
Uzi ‘Ad
Affiliation:
Israel Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem, Israel
Jacob Sharvit
Affiliation:
Israel Antiquities Authority, Jerusalem, Israel
Michele Secco
Affiliation:
Inter-Departmental Research Center for the Study of Cement Materials and Hydraulic Binders (CIRCe), University of Padova, Italy Department of Cultural Heritage (DBC), University of Padova, Italy
Giulia Ricci
Affiliation:
Inter-Departmental Research Center for the Study of Cement Materials and Hydraulic Binders (CIRCe), University of Padova, Italy Department of Geosciences, University of Padova, Italy
Gilberto Artioli
Affiliation:
Inter-Departmental Research Center for the Study of Cement Materials and Hydraulic Binders (CIRCe), University of Padova, Italy Department of Geosciences, University of Padova, Italy
*
*Corresponding author. Email: yotam.asscher@gmail.com.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hydraulic lime binders are considered a technological marvel which revolutionized construction techniques in antiquity. The core material is made of a binder that is a mixture of calcite and hydraulic phases, which are amorphous silicate compounds that nanostructurally polymerize into insoluble phases that harden even underwater, formed during the reaction between lime and reactive silicates such as volcanic ash. This is also what makes hydraulic lime so hard to radiocarbon (14C) date. These insoluble phases contain carbonates that may set centuries following their application, resulting in younger ages, which may contaminate the calcite fraction that is favorable for 14C dating. This calcite fraction forms upon the incorporation of atmospheric carbon dioxide during the setting of the hydrated lime. Therefore, different characterization methods are being constantly developed for identifying and characterizing the components of hydraulic lime-binders. In this work, we present a rapid characterization technique based on Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) that characterizes the atomic disorder and chemical environment of the carbonates and silicates fractions in the binder. The atomic disorder of the calcite crystallites was determined by the ν2 and ν4 vibrational modes, and the silicates were characterized by the main peak asymmetry and full width at half maximum (FWHM). Different hydraulic binders from Caesarea Maritima were examined, including Herodian mortars from the underwater breakwater and on-land plasters and mortars from the portʼs warehouse and vaults. Hydraulic binders, in which the calcite fraction in the binder shows atomic disorder that is comparable to modern plaster binders, was associated with silicates that have asymmetry and FWHM of clays and quartz. These materials are considered to be in good preservation state for 14C dating since their carbonates crystallites are disordered and did not interact with the environment chemically to form stable and ordered crystals. Interestingly, the atomic disorder of binders that underwent chemical alterations and recrystallization processes, are associated with reactive silicates aggregates such as volcanic ash (pozzolana). These results suggest a new way to prescreen materials for radiocarbon dating based on the composition of lime-binders and preservation state of the carbonate fraction and hydraulic products.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2020 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona
Figure 0

Table 1 Hydraulic plasters and mortars presented in this study coming from Caesarea.

Figure 1

Figure 1 Areas of sampling in Caesarea Maritima: area LL in the portʼs warehouse area at the intermediate harbor (A), area TP in the portʼs vaults (B), and area K at the outer harbor (C). Arrows point to the location of samples. The underwater breakwater of area K is showing also the wooden caisson and place of sampling (D).

Figure 2

Figure 2 Spectroscopic indicators that were monitored in this study. The carbonate peak analysis of the ν3, ν2 and ν4 peak heights follow Regev et al. (2010). The silicate peak FWHM and asymmetry following Asscher et al. (2017).

Figure 3

Table 2 Peak positions and baselines of vibrational bands used to calculate peaks intensity, asymmetry and width. For each peak the baseline is defined by two points selected at the local minimum in the spectral region here indicated (Figure 2). *The baseline of the ν2 and ν4 follow Chu et al. (2008).

Figure 4

Figure 3 FTIR spectroscopic indicators of asymmetry and FWHM of silicates standards. Note that quartz and clays are at one end of the trendline, showing lower values of asymmetry and FWHM. Feldspars, glass, volcanic materials and igneous materials are toward higher asymmetry and FWHM values.

Figure 5

Figure 4 FTIR spectroscopic indicators of the calcite ν2 and ν4 vibrational modes peak heights (normalized to ν3) of mortars and plasters from Caesarea. Noted also is the hydraulic index as calculated from elemental composition following Vola et al. (2011) (in brackets).

Figure 6

Figure 5 FTIR spectroscopic indicators of asymmetry and FWHM of silicate standards and hydraulic plasters and mortars from Caesarea. 5A) Repeated grinding of preserved materials, slightly and strongly altered (based on their calcite atomic disorder). Quartz (empty circles) and clays (empty diamonds) overlap with preserved materials, while the strongly altered overlap with the igneous (empty squares) and volcanic materials (empty triangles). An internal cross within the full circles represents the third ground in each grinding curve. 5B) Spectroscopic indicators of asymmetry and FWHM of silicate standards and samples TP-06, TP-18 and TP-24. Note that TP06 is overlapping the silicate crystallinity area of clays, while TP-24 and TP-18 are towards the ranges of volcanic materials and igneous rock, which is in agreement with the material mineralogical composition as determined by XRD (Table S2). Repeated grinding steps are marked in the label of the sample.

Figure 7

Table 3 Samples XRD phases are analcime (ana), biotite (bio), calcite (cal), gypsum (gyp), laumontite (laum), philipsite (phil), plagioclase (plag), quartz (qtz), sanidine (san), smectite (sme), aragonite (ara), and amorphous components (amp). The silicates to carbonates ratio in XRD is defined by the ratio between the QPA analysis values of (ana+bio+laum+phil+plag+qtz+san+smec) divided by (cal+ara). Also noted are the HI index based on XRF, and the FTIR spectra peak ratio between the major peak of the silicates and the major peak of the carbonates. It is important to note that the relative peak intensities in FTIR, XRF and XRD are affected by different factors, and are not a direct indication of the relative proportions of these phases.

Supplementary material: File

Asscher et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S5 and Tables S1-S2

Download Asscher et al. supplementary material(File)
File 1.4 MB